Cigar Shaped UFO from today's photo & document release at National Archives

[putnam6]

NGL some of these pictures seem like heading towards a slow methodical and measured slow disclosure or are these all DoD faked or doctored images
Cigar Shaped and more UFOs from today's photo & document release at National Archives
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1...are_button

 page 2

 
Link to the source of this photo:
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=106
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=110
and other photos/documents:
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/23857152
There are also some pretty compelling photos, especially those with radar scans

 
Clarification added later

A little clarification, the source I saw for the thread is the sub/Reddit link below

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1...are_button

 In green below are my comments, all of the rest is words and thoughts from the original source. That said further reading, suggests these pic and file dumps can and are pictures and files from ALL investigations debunked or not.  I should have been clearer in my opening post, but it's been a while since I stuck my head in the archive. 

 NGL some of these pictures seem like they are heading towards a slow methodical and measured slow disclosure or are these all DoD faked or doctored images

 Furthermore here is the information from the document dump, I should have included this as well. So there is a mixture of files and it's fully possible some images have been shown before, this is just an update or lowering of classification levels.

[UltraBudgie]

What the hell.



https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=173

[putnam6]

What the hell.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...1-0405.png]

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=173

Yeah this could be a rabbit hole,this doesn't look like the pics released in Mexico after the Grusch's Committee hearing, instill looking at files and pics/ Like the the guy on the Black Vault podcast said these releases are always jumbled and out of context we need to find the report that goes with the pic to get context 

Cool stuff though LOL ATS would be all over this in the past

[pianopraze]

NGL some of these pictures seem like heading towards a slow methodical and measured slow disclosure or are these all DoD faked or doctored images
Cigar Shaped and more UFOs from today's photo & document release at National Archives
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1...are_button

 page 2

So yet another government agency recording UFO’s when we were not recording UFOs.

our government is such a lying piece of poo.



this one looks like a rocket booster and the other one looks like a poor quality photo of a shaved monkey.

there are more interesting photos in that archive, including one looking like orbs going into water. But someone noted these photos can come from civilian sources submitted and the way it’s presented is horrible in the archive to get the notes on the cases.

Orbs

[FlyersFan]

I saw a brown cigar shaped UFO over Madison Alabama 24 years ago.
It moved slowly.  It was mid morning.  

I also saw a typical 'saucer' UFO.  Silver.  Silent.  Fast.
Mid day over Wilmington Delaware a couple of years ago.

[ArMaP]

Is this supposed to be new?

I remember seeing those two photos at https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=106 and https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=110 several years ago, and they are supposed to be a series of photos of the Moon.

[putnam6]

Is this supposed to be new?

I remember seeing those two photos at https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=106 and https://catalog.archives.gov/id/44639156...ctPage=110 several years ago, and they are supposed to be a series of photos of the Moon.

A little clarification, the source I saw for the thread is the sub/Reddit link below

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1...are_button

 In green below are my comments, all of the rest is words and thoughts from the original source. That said further reading, suggests these pic and file dumps can and are pictures and files from ALL investigations debunked or not.  I should have been clearer in my opening post, but it's been a while since I stuck my head in the archive. 

 NGL some of these pictures seem like they are heading towards a slow methodical and measured slow disclosure or are these all DoD faked or doctored images

 Furthermore here is the information from the document dump, I should have included this as well. So there is a mixture of files and it's fully possible some images have been shown before, this is just an update or lowering of classification levels. 
 

 
This series consists of redacted investigative reports and correspondence relating to sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The reports include brief information on the particular sighting, such as where and when the sighting occurred and the individual that reported it. Each report also includes an individual identification number. The remaining pages of the reports often include correspondence about the investigation and correspondence from the individual that witnessed the sighting. The records were maintained by the Project Blue Book Office and its predecessor, but there are files relating to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.
Arrangement,Arranged numerically by file number.Dates,

• The creator compiled or maintained this series between 1948–1968.
  

Function,Air Force staff compiled these records as part of the Air Force study of UFOs called Project Blue Book. Investigators from districts and commands sent the records to the Air Technical Intelligence Center at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.Access: Unrestricted,Use: Unrestricted

[UltraBudgie]

they should have called it "project shaved monkey hoax" rather than "project bluebook"

oh darn i am out of bananas to eat with my granola

[putnam6]

they should have called it "project shaved monkey hoax" rather than "project bluebook"

oh darn i am out of bananas to eat with my granola

A further point is TPTB could make these drops more organized, DoD budget is 800 billion there's no reason they can't find a crack team of researchers and analysts to go through and remove the wheat from the chaff.

Instead, it's like panning for gold in the Appalachians, you have to shift a ton of sand dirt, and mud to find a few micro nuggets of undebunked micro nuggets.

of course that could be their intentions, or it could just be bureaucratic inefficiency

[ArMaP]

of course that could be their intentions, or it could just be bureaucratic inefficiency

The power of bureaucracy is very strong, in all official places, so I wouldn't be surprised if it takes a large part of responsibility for this mess.

But, having said the above, I know personally that organising archives is not an easy task. As the only way of being sure of a document's content is to read it, many people rely on the previous classification or assume it's the same as the other documents on the same group (I don't remember the right name at the moment).