Announcing Deny Politics

[85303]

BULLSHIT! Name one conspiracy that isn’t tied to politics.

I’ll name a few of the major ones for you:

JFK assassination ✅ 

9/11 ✅ 

Alien disclosure ✅ 

Shall I go on?

ETA: And it always boggles the mind, when you have personality types, that simply just CANNOT CLICK ON THAT THREAD……..

I did it. Ignored thousands of threads. Thankfully, ALL that info was there. Especially, since I evolved through time. And those threads that weren’t so interesting to me, when I first came in 2007, all the sudden WERE interesting in 2017. Interesting how that works….. I’m glad I’m not the ignorant idiot I was in 2007. Thankfully, I had access to he information on ATS, to propel my evolution.

I'm not seeing the connection between your interests and the failures surrounding ATS.    What are these "examples" your putting forward about?     I never said the information there wasn't valuable, it was used.  And not to enhance understanding or awareness.

Tbh explaining things to kids pisses me off so you'll see me not answer this kind of inane diatribe...

[theshadowknows]

I concur. ATS was a one-stop-shop. 

So many forums, such little time.

When Above Politics was folded back into ATS is when we went downhill.

Attempting to merge and sync the user data between the two sites. Bear with me.

[DBCowboy]

Do I need to create an account or use my normal one?

[Encia22]

Do I need to create an account or use my normal one?

Yes, you need to make a new account. By all means, use your same email, handle and avatar as here, but your password will be different.

[pianopraze]

When you are being provided a forum to play in free of charge…

… why complain?

[UltraBudgie]

 why complain?

oh you sweet summer child

haha just kidding good point have a nice day everyone as it is saturday and sunny out hugs for you all!

[Maxmars]

I'm thinking most of you who are inclined to participate in Deny Politics, won't want me there. 

I tend to call out partisanship over logic frequently.  I dislike casual jabbing and prodding to evoke emotional dysfunction. I absolutely loathe the use of personal attacks as a component of political dialog.  I am not one to sit back and watch the churning of good people over crap they are told to believe, and the people they are told to hate on.

What do you think?  Could someone like me ever actually be welcome?

I mean I love politics as a subject.... but I hate politicians as a subject.  How much you want to bet that nearly every conversation will feature politician-focused vitriol?

"Shall I stay or shall I go?" - Clash

[Raptured]

ATS has become a hate-based echochamber with a sprinkling of UFO articles.

THANK YOU for separating the content.  I like my "recent post" feeds like I like my women.  Clean and unbiased

[UltraBudgie]

 

someone needs to be noncynic nonparmisan; how is that even possible nowadaze? probabley would set good tone thoug, or provide contrast for the base discourse

edit and so that is a "you question" because if high level discourse is like a duty to truth kind of strive for ideal of reason constantly keep balanace act then that could get quite exhausting but if it comes from happyjoy dgaf then maybe its like soul food so ony you can answer that but i imagine either way armor required!

[pianopraze]

ATS has become a hate-based echochamber with a sprinkling of UFO articles.

THANK YOU for separating the content.  I like my "recent post" feeds like I like my women.  Clean and unbiased

I’m posting all the UFO articles over here now that I was posting there before.

:)