35,000 years ago....

[Harte]

[ElitePlebeian]

This is mostly pareidolia if you ask me and no way to prove its anything different, so while interesting I hope you dont think what you posted is for a fact what you say it is.. Much more likely its not at all.

[Extralien]

 mostly pareidolia if you ask me and no way to prove its anything different,

Mostly...
So what about the bits that you've decided that aren't?
How are you ignoreing the bits that aren't "mostly".
This suggests you're on board with other pieces.. interesting :)

As for proving my "findings" or whatever you want to call it.. 
I do have proof that this is all deliberate.

Proof is what we all scream for, yet  many just sit there and make declarations that have no strength, at all, in their claims of "debunking"
The art does provide this at many times but this one was the clincher for me!
I had to hunt it down.
I was seeking sections of the art that could provide me with deliberately intentional markings that go beyond a shadow of a doubt.

This horse head with two deer below is it.
Firstly, look at the left image, it's the original.
Take note that the horse head does not have any ears. The deer are top-to-tail with each other and one slighlty above the other.

Then I saw the horses ear.. Halfway down its neck.
This immediately revealed the outline of another horse head, so, considering the mirroring method worked before, I tried it...

Now you we have the left, right and full frontal profile of a horse head, with both ears now pricked.
That's not all... 
Look below those profiles and you'll see a bird in flight.. 
This then blows your mind when you look back at the two deer and the "design" where they both blend is actually that same bird but perched.

So, there's just one bit and it is very possibly the strongest that proves deliberate intent with forethought, planning, prep and all othe rmanner of things..
Mirroring is exactly how they hid the face and the aircraft and a few others. Some are just right in your face instantly.
You just gotta go look at it and once you see it all, you wont un-see it. 

Now the onus is not on me to prove, but for you to prove me wrong!

[ElitePlebeian]

Mostly...
So what about the bits that you've decided that aren't?
How are you ignoreing the bits that aren't "mostly".
This suggests you're on board with other pieces.. interesting :)

As for proving my "findings" or whatever you want to call it.. 
I do have proof that this is all deliberate.

Proof is what we all scream for, yet  many just sit there and make declarations that have no strength, at all, in their claims of "debunking"
The art does provide this at many times but this one was the clincher for me!
I had to hunt it down.
I was seeking sections of the art that could provide me with deliberately intentional markings that go beyond a shadow of a doubt.

This horse head with two deer below is it.
Firstly, look at the left image, it's the original.
Take note that the horse head does not have any ears. The deer are top-to-tail with each other and one slighlty above the other.

Then I saw the horses ear.. Halfway down its neck.
This immediately revealed the outline of another horse head, so, considering the mirroring method worked before, I tried it...

Now you we have the left, right and full frontal profile of a horse head, with both ears now pricked.
That's not all... 
Look below those profiles and you'll see a bird in flight.. 
This then blows your mind when you look back at the two deer and the "design" where they both blend is actually that same bird but perched.

So, there's just one bit and it is very possibly the strongest that proves deliberate intent with forethought, planning, prep and all othe rmanner of things..
Mirroring is exactly how they hid the face and the aircraft and a few others. Some are just right in your face instantly.
You just gotta go look at it and once you see it all, you wont un-see it. 

Now the onus is not on me to prove, but for you to prove me wrong!
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...350955.jpg]

I dont understand whats so special about horses or birds? Other than the fact theyre really old. And what is the actual drawing? Left or right? 

On the first page you have quite a few farfetched explanations of vague drawings, some might not even be drawings. Eye of Horus or a map of some area, just because of a few scribbled lines. Nonsense if you ask me.