DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Corbett Report On Fauci.
#71
(05-15-2026, 07:42 AM)zosomov Wrote: Fauci is a proven liar, fraud, grifter, puppy and orphan killer, and has participated in crimes against humanity and covering them up.

On the other hand, Fauci is a hero and sex symbol for boomer liberal women. 

Make it make sense.


He’s a scientist with a specialty. 

What the hell does liberal women have to do with it?

Back up your accusations with verifiable facts and links.
#72
(05-14-2026, 02:40 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Yeah sure -- I've been on these boards for over 20 years.

In all those years I don't remember a single so called "conspiracy" proven by legitimate facts.

There's always an anonymous whistle blower. Or someone with dubious credentials.

Absolutely, their credentials always fail as do their conspiracy theories when put up to scientific investigation.

Just the fact that all governments are still recommending the Covid19 vaccination should clue everyone in as to what their medical scientific agencies actually believe through real science.

"Professional Disagreement: Major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Disease Society of America, have issued statements contradicting the federal guidance, continuing to recommend routine vaccines for children and high-risk adults based on their own evidence-based guidelines" (LLM)

Governments seem to always be doing a balancing act to portray themselves as 'neutral' or 'giving the people what they want' even if it to their detriment.

---

It may be true about older women boomers finding Fauci attractive, but not in the way imagined, attractive in the sense of high intelligence and bravery to stand up to non-scientific conspiracy theorists with his 'bring it on' attitude.
"The only journey is the one within."
#73
(05-14-2026, 02:18 PM)govshill2 Wrote: Now small wonder Fauci was pardoned.  Inside deep intel says the DOJ did a mock internal investigation for Fauci and found enough evidence to tell Biden to Pardon him!  The Pardon itself practically gives away his guilt!  Lol

That January 1, 2014 date is very, very important. That was the start of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
Fauci insisted that infected people would be allowed here. Healthcare workers treating Ebola patients were not given adequate PPP to ensure they would not become infected.

Also that is when they tested Remdesivir, Fauci's drug of choice to treat Covid positive patients. Even the WHO did not make it the standard of care. Too dangerous, killed more people than Ebola itself.

IMHO I consider that Ebola outbreak was a real world simulation. Today [May 15, 2026] is the start of Ebola outbreak #17 in DR Congo. They do everything by the numbers.

https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9


https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9


Some very suspicious timing of the approval of the Ebola vaccine.

December [19], 20[19]. 1918 & 1919 was the Spanish flu.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35202354/

I'm seeing far too many numbers lining up so these psycho's are up to something. I suspect our attention is being diverted with this Andes Hantavirus. I've gone through all of the players books and I have not come across this once, but Ebola...
#74
(05-15-2026, 12:45 PM)Thoughtful3 Wrote: That January 1, 2014 date is very, very important. That was the start of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
Fauci insisted that infected people would be allowed here. Healthcare workers treating Ebola patients were not given adequate PPP to ensure they would not become infected.

Also that is when they tested Remdesivir, Fauci's drug of choice to treat Covid positive patients. Even the WHO did not make it the standard of care. Too dangerous, killed more people than Ebola itself.

IMHO I consider that Ebola outbreak was a real world simulation. Today [May 15, 2026] is the start of Ebola outbreak #17 in DR Congo. They do everything by the numbers.

https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9


https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9


Some very suspicious timing of the approval of the Ebola vaccine.

December [19], 20[19]. 1918 & 1919 was the Spanish flu.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35202354/

I'm seeing far too many numbers lining up so these psycho's are up to something. I suspect our attention is being diverted with this Andes Hantavirus. I've gone through all of the players books and I have not come across this once, but Ebola...

I remember seeing some interesting ideas about the 1918 Spanish flu actually being a German research bioweapon!  Most articles have been scrubbed however! Maybe old relatives of Fauci involved back then!  Eureka
#75
(05-15-2026, 07:55 AM)quintessentone Wrote: Absolutely, their credentials always fail as do their conspiracy theories when put up to scientific investigation.

I try to always research the author of an article. 

Sometimes it’s quite difficult to find legitimate info on an individual. 

Op-Ed’s can show up anywhere. It’s important to recognize what type of article you’re using to make your point. 

Where it’s posted is usually irrelevant.

Ahhhhhh — and always check the date article was written.
#76
(05-15-2026, 01:49 PM)govshill2 Wrote: I remember seeing some interesting ideas about the 1918 Spanish flu actually being a German research bioweapon!  Most articles have been scrubbed however! Maybe old relatives of Fauci involved back then!  Eureka

In 1918, they didn't have Scanning Electron Microscopes and no optical microscope at the time could resolve something as small as a virus.

They had no idea of genetics except for Mendel's Pea study on heritable traits.

They had no knowledge of DNA, RNA or sub-microscopic biochemical processes in the cell until after 1953, when Watson and Crick discovered the DNA molecule.

How are they supposed to have engineered a virus?

LOL Tongue
Support the Christchurch Call
#77
(05-15-2026, 12:45 PM)Thoughtful3 Wrote: That January 1, 2014 date is very, very important. That was the start of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

Patient zero of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa was a two-year-old boy from the village of Meliandou in Guinea, who fell ill and died on 6 December 2013.

Quote:Fauci insisted that infected people would be allowed here. Healthcare workers treating Ebola patients were not given adequate PPP to ensure they would not become infected.

7 people with Ebola were medically evacuated to the US. Two people were infected within US borders, and a further two were believed to have contracted the disease during the transport. 11 people in total. Only 2 people have died of Ebola within the USA. 9 people recovered.

There has been no outbreak of Ebola in the USA and quarantine, therapeutical regimes, and other mitigations were developed and proven effective from very early on.

Fauci's involvement protected the USA against the potential of an Ebola outbreak there.

Quote:Also that is when they tested Remdesivir, Fauci's drug of choice to treat Covid positive patients. Even the WHO did not make it the standard of care. Too dangerous, killed more people than Ebola itself.

Remdesivir was originally developed by Gilead Sciences in 2009 to treat hepatitis C and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but it was later repurposed for use against Ebola and coronaviruses, including COVID-19. It is now recognized as the first antiviral drug approved for COVID-19 treatment in the U.S. It is still an approved general purpose antiviral, however, immunization and more effective antivirals are now preferred for COVID-19.

Despite online lies to the contrary, Remdesivir's rare side effects are; nausea, increased liver enzymes, and allergic reactions, including infusion-related reactions and anaphylaxis. Other common side effects include back pain, chest tightness, chills, cough, fever, headache, and trouble breathing. None of these are fatal in the high-care medical situations where they are prescribed.

No, medical trial did not find COVID antiviral was 'deadly'

Quote:IMHO I consider that Ebola outbreak was a real world simulation. Today [May 15, 2026] is the start of Ebola outbreak #17 in DR Congo. They do everything by the numbers.

https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9

https://apnews.com/article/congo-ebola-o...40a5c26ef9

Some very suspicious timing of the approval of the Ebola vaccine.

December [19], 20[19]. 1918 & 1919 was the Spanish flu.

Albert Gitchell, a U.S. Army cook at Camp Funston Army Camp in Kansas, USA, is often considered the first known case of the 1918 'Spanish' flu pandemic, which began in March 1918.

Quote:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35202354/

I'm seeing far too many numbers lining up so these psycho's are up to something. I suspect our attention is being diverted with this Andes Hantavirus. I've gone through all of the players books and I have not come across this once, but Ebola...

Sometimes numbers and dates look similar, but the similarity is totally arbitrary and an expected outcome of a system where a limited number of digits (1234567890) is used to represent an infinite continuum of numbers. Not to mention that different longitudes on the Earth have different dates and times at the same instant, which is an instant kybosh of all those prophecies of world events happening on a specific date.

Also, every date or number you have quoted in this post is very approximate. But they all occurred within the last few millennia, so, I suppose, "Illuminati confirmed"! then.

Tongue
Support the Christchurch Call
#78
(05-15-2026, 04:08 PM)chr0naut Wrote: In 1918, they didn't have Scanning Electron Microscopes and no optical microscope at the time could resolve something as small as a virus.

They had no idea of genetics except for Mendel's Pea study on heritable traits.

They had no knowledge of DNA, RNA or sub-microscopic biochemical processes in the cell until after 1953, when Watson and Crick discovered the DNA molecule.

How are they supposed to have engineered a virus?

LOL Tongue


Smilegrin but but Wow
Quote:During World War I (WWI), also referred to as 'The Great War,' Germany implemented a pioneering biowarfare program as part of a broader military strategy to undermine Allied forces by targeting their logistical and supply capabilities. This initiative, unprecedented in its systematic and strategic application, utilized a variety of pathogens, primarily targeting animal populations, to disrupt support systems without contravening international laws, specifically the 1907 Hague Convention. The operations, shrouded in secrecy and largely led by the German General Staff, included sophisticated sabotage actions against both enemy and neutral states. The allegations and usage of bioweapons increased the interest of the Great Powers in further developing their own biowarfare program.


Instances of Biowarfare in World War I (1914–1918)


Anthrax is strongly linked to the fifth and sixth plagues of Moses in the Bible, which describe the mass death of cattle, camels, sheep, and other animals, followed by the sixth plague initiated during the collection of the dead animals. The Egyptians likely contracted cutaneous anthrax during this process [13]. Anthrax was first noted by Virgil in Georgics, and later in 1727, Nicolas Fournier (1700-1781) identified two forms: charbon spontané, thought to arise from sun exposure, and charbon contagieux, contracted from infected meat or animal products. Robert Koch (1843-1910) discovered the bacterium in 1875. Its use as a biological warfare agent began during World War I, and post-war, it was extensively developed in the Soviet Union.


 
#79
(05-15-2026, 05:08 PM)govshill2 Wrote: Smilegrin but but Wow

They used to poison wells by throwing a dead animal in, going way back to ancient times.

During the world wars, the Germans, the Japanese and the US all experimented with taking cloths from foot and mouth (and other livestock disease) infected cattle and dropping them in water troughs to infect more in enemy territory.

But bioengineering a virus is a different level of tech, one completely beyond possibility of what they could do in 1918.

Even transporting a virus, except by living host species to living host species, was not possible then. So, since the 1918 flu infected humans, that would involve making people sick and then moving them to a foreign country, infecting everyone on the way, before landing them in the target country. And of course international travel in 1918 wasn't quick. Your 'infectors' could die or get better before they reached their target.

Nor is there anything much at the time that would stop a viral contagion from spreading from their incubating 'lab' out through their own population first.
Support the Christchurch Call
#80
(05-15-2026, 05:27 PM)chr0naut Wrote: They used to poison wells by throwing a dead animal in, going way back to ancient times.

During the world wars, the Germans, the Japanese and the US all experimented with taking cloths from foot and mouth (and other livestock disease) infected cattle and dropping them in water troughs to infect more in enemy territory.

But bioengineering a virus is a different level of tech, one completely beyond possibility of what they could do in 1918.

Even transporting a virus, except by living host species to living host species, was not possible then. So, since the 1918 flu infected humans, that would involve making people sick and then moving the to a foreign country, infecting everyone on the way, before landing them in the target country. And of course international travel in 1918 wasn't quick. Your 'infectors' could die or get better before they reached their target.

Nor is there anything much at the time that would stop a viral contagion from spreading from their incubating 'lab' out through their own population first.


Read closer. They used existing and enhanced viruses AS bioweapons. And they DID "engineer" some enhancements.  The 1918 "Spanish Flu" may very well have been a bioweapon enhanced and released by Germany.   Biggrin ?



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  House Report on the Covid Pandemic UltraBudgie 15 1,303 12-09-2024, 04:39 PM
Last Post: sahgwa
  Report: CDC was aware of COVID vaccine deaths Maxmars 1 452 05-02-2024, 07:11 AM
Last Post: CCoburn