DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

USAID may have had a goal besides countering Soviet influence
#1
USAID was established in 1961.  The ostensible reason was to counter Soviet influence in underdeveloped regions which had resources the US needed.  Perhaps it targeted countries whose economic development was insufficient to be able to profit from resource sales enough to not require additional aid.

There may have been another reason.  

The 1960s revolution may have had as its goal the communization of intelligence.  

The revolution may have been planned, perhaps by the Soviet Comintern, perhaps by ethnic supremacists of various nationalities who wanted to see their people move forward through the communization of intelligence.  Perhaps they had studied how influencers and ideas can go viral.  Perhaps their grassroots gangs controlled powerful figures. 

Someone may have anticipated that the third world would be savvy enough to understand what the freedom generation wanted.  The concern may have been that the third world would say "how are the freedom generation more deserving than us?" 

The concern, then, may have been that the developing world might start to pray or meditate in order to interfere with the rapport with which the freedom generation hoped to liberate itself. 

The third world surely needed spirituality to live their day-to-day lives and keep their competitors from looking over their shoulder or otherwise tampering with their outcomes.
#2
USAID was easy picking for when DOGE had a shot at things. What are the odds of some Red Cross, UNICEF culture that find where the vulnerable children are? The nature of the industry does attract those with a stronger self interest.
#3
(02-24-2026, 09:25 PM)Solvedit Wrote: The 1960s revolution may have had as its goal the communization of intelligence.  

What revolution?

Quote:Someone may have anticipated that the third world would be savvy enough to understand what the freedom generation wanted.  The concern may have been that the third world would say "how are the freedom generation more deserving than us?" 

What's the "freedom generation"?
#4
The subject organizational construct was always populated - not with 'expert' leadership, but political appointees, 'friends of industry,' and combines and cabals masquerading as 'associations.'

Every opportunity to exploit was on the table... they had a virtuous armor provided by the 'actors.'

Meanwhile they sat silently by... as everything went 'to hell.'
It wasn't 'politically' expedient to shine a light on it...
but then...
somehow it never is.

The majority of 'global' and 'national' constructs are not at all what their brochures say.

They are part of a highly-integrated well-defined (profitable) cooperation... always entrenched in evident corruption and 'character intrigue.'

The concept of "countering Soviet influence" is a strictly considered word-bomb created to offset the discomfort with openly recognizing that you are 'playing dirty.'  But the law (even global) is not known for being a matter of "morality."

It was economic warfare... expressed through "social" actions.
(by the way it further proved the robustness of capitalism, at the time.)

It's like having a mission to accomplish ... and giving it to thugs to do it.

NOT what was intended at all... it's just they were prepared for the 'government-supported' mission... as were all their 'friends.'  

Ugly...
top to bottom, and left to fester for some reason...
odd that?