06-12-2024, 02:09 AM
This post was last modified 06-12-2024, 02:09 AM by Maxmars.
Edit Reason: grammar
I don't know what to say anymore.
It appears that anything that might make a person think about the nature of their world now has a danger of 'radicalizing' the reader. I'm sure these people (who make such assertions) would enjoy being granted the power to make those texts disappear. And then we might all just enjoy the 'approved' materials that lead to the warm and fuzzy Utopia in their minds.
But what will they do to anyone who spontaneously raises the same questions which these authors evoke in their work? Oh, that's right... misinformation/disinformation list and "cancelled."
They scrape at reality to justify their fears. If they ever encounter a thought which makes them falter... they recommend labelling it "bad."
I'm convinced they are truly lost in their cloisters.
It appears that anything that might make a person think about the nature of their world now has a danger of 'radicalizing' the reader. I'm sure these people (who make such assertions) would enjoy being granted the power to make those texts disappear. And then we might all just enjoy the 'approved' materials that lead to the warm and fuzzy Utopia in their minds.
But what will they do to anyone who spontaneously raises the same questions which these authors evoke in their work? Oh, that's right... misinformation/disinformation list and "cancelled."
They scrape at reality to justify their fears. If they ever encounter a thought which makes them falter... they recommend labelling it "bad."
I'm convinced they are truly lost in their cloisters.
