510
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien...41291.html
I was trying to find a link from a newspaper that won't offer the usual apologies for a failed vaccine. I don't know whether I have succeeded but at least in the article you can read clearly why the vaccine was withdrawn after causing some very serious but 'rare' side effects such as blood clots that were often fatal. More than three years into the vaccine programs and the narrative hasn't changed but the truth has come out.
Did you notice the familiar phrase 'rare serious side effects'. I wonder how anyone can use the argument these vaccines cause rare side effects and therefore are safe and effective. The Independent (UK Newspaper) couldn't resist the temptation and gave this title to the article:
Trying to downplay the significant event of worldwide withdrawal. Shame on them!!!
I was trying to find a link from a newspaper that won't offer the usual apologies for a failed vaccine. I don't know whether I have succeeded but at least in the article you can read clearly why the vaccine was withdrawn after causing some very serious but 'rare' side effects such as blood clots that were often fatal. More than three years into the vaccine programs and the narrative hasn't changed but the truth has come out.
Did you notice the familiar phrase 'rare serious side effects'. I wonder how anyone can use the argument these vaccines cause rare side effects and therefore are safe and effective. The Independent (UK Newspaper) couldn't resist the temptation and gave this title to the article:
Quote:AstraZeneca withdraws Covid vaccine worldwide after admitting it can cause rare blood clots
Trying to downplay the significant event of worldwide withdrawal. Shame on them!!!
