DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Is this an irregularity? Response to Payne Stewart jet off course vs 9/11 response
#5
(05-25-2025, 07:12 AM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: I find the first sentence of this thread totally misleading. No one died in that crash. They were already dead for hours before that aircraft ran out of fuel.

Along with what has been mentioned in the above reply, 9/11 involved several unknowns that made it muh more confusing. The time to realize what was going on is a large factor in not being a comparison at all.

A single aircraft with a functional transponder is easy to track compared to several aircraft that had gone almost totaly radio silent for no apparent reason. One 9/11 aircraft did make a transmission thinking they were on the intercom, but all transponders were turned off.

Also the timelines from beginning to end of the 9/11 events is much shorter then the Payne Stewart flight.

A loose hose clamp can be deadly.


Sorry I wasn't trying to be misleading, I was just trying to hurry and type it up to post before I had to go to work. I could have worded it better. I am aware they were dead up there just flying around. The crash didn't kill them. Like I said in my reply to Zaphod I was watching this documentary 9/11 the new pearl harbor and it made it seem like despite the transponder being off somehow ATC knew where the plane was [flight 11] and had audio of supposedly an air traffic controller saying "okay I see him" or something similar regarding flight 11, despite the transponder being off. 

I just like learning things. It is mind bottling to me that people think this thing was a hoax so i just try and ask questions, maybe dumb ones, but i want to learn!



Messages In This Thread
RE: Is this an irregularity? Response to Payne Stewart jet off course vs 9/11 response - by Shoshanna - 05-25-2025, 07:26 AM