03-24-2024, 01:11 PM
Direct and excessive EM and RF radiation exposure affects biological cell processes. It always has, always will.
Most of this research seems to be focused on those results of "exposure" without specifying just how long, where, and how much exposure is causing the damage. Also, generalized alarms like this are usually the product of 'backdoor' activism... the most insidious kind.
I was worried for a long time about the claims of antagonists to telecommunications tech. For one thing the technology developers already know that opening line about EM/RF radiation exposure ... and two, the "promoters" of it couldn't give a rats' ass about trifles such as 'safety' (that's stuff's only for marketing.)
Talking about such emissions and naming Starlink specifically is rather disingenuous... considering how long we all have been exposed to man-made RF/EM over the last 100 years... It's like belaboring the health hazards of smoking cigarettes but mentioning only one brand.
When a single commercial entity is targeted ... my first suspicion is the use of "backdoor activism" where someone has an agenda against that particular business (or its owner.)
Most of this research seems to be focused on those results of "exposure" without specifying just how long, where, and how much exposure is causing the damage. Also, generalized alarms like this are usually the product of 'backdoor' activism... the most insidious kind.
I was worried for a long time about the claims of antagonists to telecommunications tech. For one thing the technology developers already know that opening line about EM/RF radiation exposure ... and two, the "promoters" of it couldn't give a rats' ass about trifles such as 'safety' (that's stuff's only for marketing.)
Talking about such emissions and naming Starlink specifically is rather disingenuous... considering how long we all have been exposed to man-made RF/EM over the last 100 years... It's like belaboring the health hazards of smoking cigarettes but mentioning only one brand.
When a single commercial entity is targeted ... my first suspicion is the use of "backdoor activism" where someone has an agenda against that particular business (or its owner.)
