04-21-2025, 09:48 PM
(04-21-2025, 09:24 PM)Compendium Wrote: Yes
They also need to establish a project concentrating on deciphering deeper needing within translated source material. Alternate translations, AI algorithmic sequencing of phonetic patterns. Semiotics. Morphology. Phonology
They are well aware the a majority of the Biblical texts are incorrectly translated
The fact they ignore this and make no effort to improve the translations and find deeper intended meaning and knowledge is criminal
They cannot purport themselves to be the conveyors of the ancient writings and wisdom, at the same time that they systematical forsake them
I wholeheartedly agree...
Could it be that linguistics can only provide a better image of the Word... not reshape it's meaning?
Such matters are for the truly attuned, and linguistics is the scalpel to understanding what is being said.
Translation is as delicate a thing as interpretation... assuming the interpreter really knows the subject.
As for the 'changing times' and the epochs of our understanding I have to remain realistic about my understanding.
It sounds to me like Pope Francis' death is being projected as heralding change...
(so nothing has changed really, there hasn't been a single papal death that wasn't called
a harbinger of doom. It's natural social behavior when an icon dies.
The heavens are a template for many things... but not directions.
We are human... we can 'direct' ourselves...
(in fact, it's the seminal human experience)
I do believe that such things as portents and wisdom exists...
It's fascinating.
But Pope Francis was a man... as a symbol, he struggled.
... who wouldn't?
