03-04-2024, 03:56 PM
I am completely new to this case.
But I do know that here in the States we suffer from "public" poisoning frequently with many such murder trials.
I could argue (sight unseen) that it may have been made into a spectacle to encourage viewership or readership... and the fact that law-enforcement behaved bombastically and thuggishly only "sweetened" the value of the "show."
That does taint the imagery of the case, but I am inclined to accept the 'traditional' sense that judges are 'judicial,' and that legal forms and practices protect the process from 'publicity' tomfoolery (but really, it seems that is not always the case.)
Not meaning to challenge your take on this by any means. I sense some discomfort in how this all went down.
But I do know that here in the States we suffer from "public" poisoning frequently with many such murder trials.
I could argue (sight unseen) that it may have been made into a spectacle to encourage viewership or readership... and the fact that law-enforcement behaved bombastically and thuggishly only "sweetened" the value of the "show."
That does taint the imagery of the case, but I am inclined to accept the 'traditional' sense that judges are 'judicial,' and that legal forms and practices protect the process from 'publicity' tomfoolery (but really, it seems that is not always the case.)
Not meaning to challenge your take on this by any means. I sense some discomfort in how this all went down.
