AI models choose violence ?

[ArMaP]

But it never was like a human intelligence, it doesn't even qualify as "artificial" intelligence it simply "speaks" well.... it just "generates natural language well."

Exactly.
As far as I understand it, they use neural networks and "deep learning" to feed the data to the language model, but, being a language model, it does lack intelligence.
A few months ago I decided to do a test and asked ChatGPT how to solve a known puzzle (the wolf, sheep, cabbage problem) and, as expected, it was able to give me the solution.
Then I asked about a slightly different (and easier, as it has more than one solution) problem similar to the previous one, and it wasn't able to give me the correct answer.

But even as a language model it has serious flaws. Another thing I tried was to ask it for a list of words with 5 letters in which the 3 letter was a specific one (like a, for example), and after 4 tries it wasn't able to give me a correct list of 20 words.

Then "marketing said" ... "Never mind that! ... It can take over the world... It's scary.... it's powerful.... Invest now." ... and media followed suit.

This has been a marketing job since the start. Some predictions for 2024 are expecting an increase in hardware sales because of the extra hardware needed to use AI, which is very hardware intensive.

... and here we are.  There is no AI that we (the public) have seen. 

Some things are considered AI, like image/pattern recognition.
The main problem is that there isn't a clear definition of intelligence, so it's hard to know what AI is and is not.