11 hours ago
(Today, 10:25 AM)sahgwa Wrote: But if infinity, as you have written, is a property of 'something,' that means ipso facto it is behind that something? Or in other words, the something could not exist without infinity.
That is to say, the void is true nature?
Infinity is a property of creation, one cannot exit without the other. As I have written, when something exists, so infinity exists. There is then no "behind".
"That is to say, the void is true nature?" No, there is no void. There is ∞ = 0, or there is ∞ = 1. Perhaps revisit Part 1 and the definition of nothing.