01-16-2025, 04:15 PM
(01-16-2025, 03:33 PM)quintessentone Wrote: That's why the owner/moderators of a social forum need to take responsibility to decide if the Proud Boys' rhetoric is an acceptable source as truth/fact.
If they want to wash their hands of that responsibility, like the owner of Facebook, then it will either morph into an echo chamber or a hostile site with ill will and butt hurt all around. No way can any good discussions or debate take place, only opinions and mudslinging.
That doesn't seem to come off as what you're saying. It seems like you're saying that you don't think anyone should post their rhetoric. Is that not free speech? Isn't it then up to the reader to find out if what they say is truth or not?
Because I believe people should have the right to their own opinions and to find out the truth for themselves. If they choose not to do so, well that's on them, and then they get called out with facts. That happened a lot on the other site.
Maybe I misinterpreted your post?
Mr. Poops: Read a book, it's like broccoli for your brain. (Are you even still around?)
The earth provides everything we need. We thought we could do better. We were wrong.
The earth provides everything we need. We thought we could do better. We were wrong.
