01-14-2025, 10:03 AM
1) The Arctic Circle is undeniably a strategic concern for anyone fantasizing about military conflict in the hemisphere.
As we all mostly all aware, transnational entities and 1st world powers always manifest obsessively-focused military fantasies, their media 'partners' echo and amplify this reality with due relish... profiting both financially and politically in the extreme. We, the citizens of the planet are subject to the "show" 24/7.
2) The Arctic Circle is undeniably a economic concern for anyone fantasizing about natural resource exploitation.
The global monopoly that is the Uni-Bank encourages anything the engenders revenue streams which they feed on... the media/gambling empire calls out 'investment opportunities' and cite things like "job creation" to obfuscate the nature of their massive gains... speaking of these opportunities as if they had no cost, only profit.
3) The Arctic Circle is undeniably a political concern for the 'show business' of political posturing.
There is a certain glee present in the idea of the territorial 'expansion,' there is also a virtue-signaling opportunity in openly present harsh criticism of the potential change. I anticipate a "talking head" show will soon ply their 'wisdom' to the topic... it should be fun to examine their 'process.'
Unfortunately, the rather small population of Greenland is poised to be either oppressed or elevated by the development... but in no way is this about the people of Greenland (you may have noticed... somehow Denmark is the main focus... not Greenland directly.)
I will be interested to see how the Globalists posture and make use of this idea... which I believe ultimately is a distraction... but think tanks make vast wealth playing with these open social discussions... While the United States may actually benefit the regional population, are we in a position to convince them that is so? And if we let the politicians 'play the game' will it not only be a pack bullshit lies and promises?
Or could it be that Greenlanders do possess some "pride" in their would-be sovereignty? And what is that sovereignty actually worth when the globalist wolves are already at the door?
As we all mostly all aware, transnational entities and 1st world powers always manifest obsessively-focused military fantasies, their media 'partners' echo and amplify this reality with due relish... profiting both financially and politically in the extreme. We, the citizens of the planet are subject to the "show" 24/7.
2) The Arctic Circle is undeniably a economic concern for anyone fantasizing about natural resource exploitation.
The global monopoly that is the Uni-Bank encourages anything the engenders revenue streams which they feed on... the media/gambling empire calls out 'investment opportunities' and cite things like "job creation" to obfuscate the nature of their massive gains... speaking of these opportunities as if they had no cost, only profit.
3) The Arctic Circle is undeniably a political concern for the 'show business' of political posturing.
There is a certain glee present in the idea of the territorial 'expansion,' there is also a virtue-signaling opportunity in openly present harsh criticism of the potential change. I anticipate a "talking head" show will soon ply their 'wisdom' to the topic... it should be fun to examine their 'process.'
Unfortunately, the rather small population of Greenland is poised to be either oppressed or elevated by the development... but in no way is this about the people of Greenland (you may have noticed... somehow Denmark is the main focus... not Greenland directly.)
I will be interested to see how the Globalists posture and make use of this idea... which I believe ultimately is a distraction... but think tanks make vast wealth playing with these open social discussions... While the United States may actually benefit the regional population, are we in a position to convince them that is so? And if we let the politicians 'play the game' will it not only be a pack bullshit lies and promises?
Or could it be that Greenlanders do possess some "pride" in their would-be sovereignty? And what is that sovereignty actually worth when the globalist wolves are already at the door?
