12-19-2024, 03:19 AM
This post was last modified 12-19-2024, 03:57 AM by IdeomotorPrisoner. Edited 10 times in total.
Edit Reason: I should try editing once... I'm bad at this. 10 it is.
This isn't really a new concept.
Advaita Vedenta beat him to it. At least it sounds like pretty much the same thing... in a read between the lines type way.
He's essentially a Hindu, he just puts the concepts in math terms.
Looking into him, Mensa doesn't acknowledge the IQ Test he took, and his IQ has been put in the 155 to 175 range. Which is still amazing.
To the panpsychism of his theory.
I'll give him up to a "Mandlebrot Set" type example, whereby a simply defined system can lead to infinite complexity.
What I can't do is connect our synaptic consciousness directly to a divine form... I'm like a Therevada Buddhist with impermanence, default hostility, and no divine self as "universal truths."
I can see an underlying allowance for information to be carried by animo acids and grow in disorder/complexity, but I think the infinite nature of God does not allow for specifics. It gives you the thermodynamic like properties and lets it organically compile itself.
Our consciousness is secondary to the mathematical codes and proofs that allow its existence.
Do we have direct access and connection to the infinite godhead? That's far too abstract in my mind. We could have access to a range of possible outcomes that God's program (of underlying principles) allows for. Maybe gleam the most probable outcomes in a glitch type of way. Intuit chaotic trends, which itself is nebulous to explain.
I see (The Godhead) as ambivalent and indifferent. Not of love, not of hate. The "divine ways" that we adopt, if not based on instinct, are survival mechanisms to juxtapose the overall somewhat cruel nature of it all.
And for fun....
Lol... I took the IQ Test that says, "If you answer 25 correct you have a 140 IQ." The one the article advertises 5 times.
This is the hardest question
Not kidding.
Advaita Vedenta beat him to it. At least it sounds like pretty much the same thing... in a read between the lines type way.
Quote:Advaita Vedanta (/ʌdˈvaɪtə vɛˈdɑːntə/; Sanskrit: अद्वैत वेदान्त, IAST: Advaita Vedānta) is a Hindu tradition of textual exegesis and philosophy which states that jivatman, the individual experiencing self, is ultimately pure awareness mistakenly identified with body and the senses, and non-different ("na aparah") from Ātman-Brahman, the highest Self or Reality.
He's essentially a Hindu, he just puts the concepts in math terms.
Looking into him, Mensa doesn't acknowledge the IQ Test he took, and his IQ has been put in the 155 to 175 range. Which is still amazing.
To the panpsychism of his theory.
I'll give him up to a "Mandlebrot Set" type example, whereby a simply defined system can lead to infinite complexity.
What I can't do is connect our synaptic consciousness directly to a divine form... I'm like a Therevada Buddhist with impermanence, default hostility, and no divine self as "universal truths."
I can see an underlying allowance for information to be carried by animo acids and grow in disorder/complexity, but I think the infinite nature of God does not allow for specifics. It gives you the thermodynamic like properties and lets it organically compile itself.
Our consciousness is secondary to the mathematical codes and proofs that allow its existence.
Do we have direct access and connection to the infinite godhead? That's far too abstract in my mind. We could have access to a range of possible outcomes that God's program (of underlying principles) allows for. Maybe gleam the most probable outcomes in a glitch type of way. Intuit chaotic trends, which itself is nebulous to explain.
I see (The Godhead) as ambivalent and indifferent. Not of love, not of hate. The "divine ways" that we adopt, if not based on instinct, are survival mechanisms to juxtapose the overall somewhat cruel nature of it all.
And for fun....
Lol... I took the IQ Test that says, "If you answer 25 correct you have a 140 IQ." The one the article advertises 5 times.
This is the hardest question
Not kidding.
![[Image: New%20signature-retake-again-sorry.jpg]](https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/New%20signature-retake-again-sorry.jpg)
