Existence

[CCoburn]

Unless you work with the stuff directly, complex manifold are practically useless, because explaining them is so abstruse. There's not exactly a wide audience for that stuff. So, in a real sense, if it doesn't exist on the "simple English" version of Wikipedia, it is imaginary thumb-twiddling. So, by that logic, all you're going to get are manifolds such as explained in https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold

But remember math is a tool to model systems of perception of reality, so if you start by trying to understand the details of the math and then seeing how reality might match that, it's a backwards practice, isn't it?

 

They're probably applying mathematics in a context where it isn't relevant, so they reconcile with these bizarre micro-dimensions.

It's probably in the same ballpark as applying the D=M/V formula to a non-spatial existential singularity. Where this singularity is the only thing in existence, period, and yes, just to reiterate this means that there exists no physical space outside of/beyond this singularity(or primordial point).

This "non-spatial" parameter is often referred as a 'negative existence'. In the above formula where M(mass) is greater than zero and V(volume) is equal to zero D(density) is often said (or understood) to be infinte. However, this is also putting the cart before the horse as the primordial(or God) is not defined by mathematics but the other way around. I think though in lieu of "infinite" that 'undefined' would be preferable. Of course, though I would also venture a guess that all notable attributes of the primordial(or eternal) would be of virtually infinite quality, but it's just that "density" being a term within a mathematical formula seems a little 'off' to me for some reason although to a degree I can force myself to make some sense of it.