12-10-2024, 10:14 PM
(12-10-2024, 10:06 PM)CCoburn Wrote: I can conceive other dimensions of existence that make more sense to me than calabi-yau manifolds (which is probably just a mathematical orgasm).
Unless you work with the stuff directly, complex manifold are practically useless, because explaining them is so abstruse. There's not exactly a wide audience for that stuff. So, in a real sense, if it doesn't exist on the "simple English" version of Wikipedia, it is imaginary thumb-twiddling. So, by that logic, all you're going to get are manifolds such as explained in https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold
But remember math is a tool to model systems of perception of reality, so if you start by trying to understand the details of the math and then seeing how reality might match that, it's a backwards practice, isn't it?
"I cannot give you what you deny yourself. Look for solutions from within." - Kai Opaka
