12-10-2024, 06:37 PM
(12-10-2024, 03:15 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: yeah i looked into that pic that was going around showing the spike in background radiation at the edison nj location right before the things started being seen in the sky last month. did a dive on it and the long term data shows similar spikes in the summer this year. didn't try to correlate the long term data.
so scanning for dirty rad seems plausible, but doesn't explain the weirdtech behaviour in some sightings. makes sense that if there were weird showups from uap, then the govmt response would be to paper the area with drones, spam helicopter and powerline false sighting stories, etc., to bury the actual weird stuff in confusion and give a plausible explanation path, eg secret govmt activity, chinaspy, or so on.
oh and now the sightings have moved into newyork and delaware? mmmk.
edit to add: you can check out the rad stuff here i downloaded the year's data for edison nj and graphed it but there's historical data there too i didn't bother getting in to but maybe someone should:
current data: https://www.epa.gov/radnet/radnet-near-r...e-air-data
historical data: https://www.epa.gov/radnet/radnet-csv-file-downloads#NJ
just graphed 2023 and there's some interesting spikes there too. dunno if it matters. but shows the nov spike wasn't unprecedented afaik.
here is 2023-2024:
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...-37-40.png]
Here's the thing a speaker just testified about drone tech, this is nothing new Ukraine has been the de facto proving grounds for drone tech since Russia SMO began.
I find it difficult to believe after almost 3 years DoD or Intelligence hasn't captured or gleaned any information about drone surveillance or countermeasures. These have to be known by TPTB no way no how would a competent administration let unknown or foreign surveillance tech survive this long?
the "drones" being ours is the only logical answer
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart