11-24-2024, 02:13 AM
Given how many citizen lawsuits against states are happening in regard to US Constitutional issues (2A and 4A in particular but I suspect 9A and 14A soon as well). Should a federal office be created to review these laws and complaints in order to prevent states from abusing the legal system for the occurrence of suppressing citizen rights?
While I don't like the idea of governmental bloat, I like the idea of the recent use of "Lawfare", or use of the legal system to hinder or suppress Constitutional Rights of the citizens. Having an office with a mandate of reviewing laws that toe this line of Constitutional Rights and are often trampled on by states (looking at you West Coast states), then further hindered by the system by certain politicalized judges shuffling around cases in order to defer justice for these cases. The creation of a Department of Justice office that does nothing but review these issues and intervene in these cases to provide Immedient relief for the public being targeted by these unlawful laws.
As a side of having this office, the Judicial System wouldn't be as taxed by these cases so that cases in que can be dealt with in a timelier manner.
What does the community at large think?
While I don't like the idea of governmental bloat, I like the idea of the recent use of "Lawfare", or use of the legal system to hinder or suppress Constitutional Rights of the citizens. Having an office with a mandate of reviewing laws that toe this line of Constitutional Rights and are often trampled on by states (looking at you West Coast states), then further hindered by the system by certain politicalized judges shuffling around cases in order to defer justice for these cases. The creation of a Department of Justice office that does nothing but review these issues and intervene in these cases to provide Immedient relief for the public being targeted by these unlawful laws.
As a side of having this office, the Judicial System wouldn't be as taxed by these cases so that cases in que can be dealt with in a timelier manner.
What does the community at large think?
