Zero and the Nine Numbers of Creation

[CCoburn]

Circling back to this. I think that one problem in discussing these models is that, since their scope is so wide, they are inherently analogous, and even at that level no analogy is flexible enough to fully encompass the scope of the models.

I wasn't implying to a flying back over here and replying, but more so in leveraging the reply I was trying. I don't expect you to adorn this castle of absurdities with rationalities, but of course you will, because it's what people do.

These models are so ridiculously simple yet unaccommodatingly complex because they deal with existence, and the metaphorical mainstream of Trump and Kamala couldn't be any more at odds with one another – the old David Letterman toss the pencil through the window sound effect.

The two main theories are anything but "analogous", one goes one way, and one goes the other, and I've resolved them down to absurdities and logical tautologies; even sent them to their gender appropriate fitting rooms in anticipation their adorning eternity – the Occams' razor applying quite well to existential garments figuratively as well as literally.