Is the "New World Order" racist?

[UltraBudgie]

The globalist approach to governance pertains to humans reduced to generic 'cattle.'  They are in fact, non-racist.  Certainly, not hostile or hateful to a particular category of cow.  They value cows for being cows...

Yes, I think that's it, in rather blunt language. Although it can be noble to practice animal husbandry with care and respect for the animals, the analogy evokes the image of the ear-tagged concentrated feeding operations that Americans avoid looking at. But the core elitist idea, of their control being "responsible stewardship" over the lessers who would otherwise descend themselves into chaos, remains.

Some might argue that evoking and amplifying latent racism in the public, for purposes of political control, is racist, and makes those doing it racist, even if they regard everyone with equal contempt. Sort of like how passively benefiting from a system of extractionist colonialism is an implicit endorsement of it, and makes you guilty, if your young hair is blue and you scream such things.

No system is racist that does not explicitly invoke racial bias (and there are governments that do) - but even if a governments doesn't proclaim racial relevance to governance, the people working in it's name may.   Racism is a social dysfunction, not a political one.  It can be made political, but politics doesn't require racism as an existential component.

I guess that's the distinction I was looking for. That seems a narrow definition, by modern standards. "Racism", as I understand it, is now considered to include choosing not to loudly denounce any socio-political system that supports or institutionalizes racist outcomes, even after you've been explicitly told to do so by young college idealists whose perspective is obviously better than yours and not sophomoric at all (they say). But I don't mean to widen my definition of the topic that much.

Clearly, the "othering" that the NWO uses to control the populace finds racist outlets. From rhetoric similar to "cesspool countries" and immigrant-blaming, stereotypes of nationality extend to cultural groups, and eventually extend to racial demographics, for those predisposed to such latch on to such. That is knowingly and cynically used to cloak racism. The generational money does not merely see, for example, South America, as culturally backwards, there's a latent perception of racial inferiority there, too. Remember, these people were eugenicists, before publicly endorsing that became, um, inconvenient. And we may say we are dropping bombs on peoples because "they hate our way of life", or some such, but it also neatly matches up with their language, religion, and skin colour. Humans are not known for subtle nuance at large scale.

Classism is usually denied by every upper-class in almost any society.  It was once ignorantly embraced as 'self-evident' and 'natural.'  Of late , we're seeing the problems it actually causes.  And the upper classes can offer no solutions... while solutions proposed by lower-classes seem always to invoke the destruction of the upper-class.

What that tells us might seem self-evident.

That is true and actually makes me think the elitist have a point. Americans are terrible (and not just Americans) and all to ready to hate and kill. But is that because they've been made that way, deliberately, by decades of being told who (other than themselves!) to despise? Generations of movies telling them the way to solve problems is to find the right bad guys to kill? If you want to justify being the "good guy" keeping it all in check, perhaps you have to create the problem, and I think that's what's been done by the NWO. Many many times. It works.

Sorry, if I didn't quite meet the challenge of the OP.  But I did try.

No, that was excellent and I very much admire the idealism you expressed in some of the portions I elided.