10-28-2024, 04:26 PM
There are literally hundreds of different kinds of cattle. The color ranges span everything between pure colors, and patterned manifestations of appearance.
In that context, cattle ranchers are not racists... or specifically biased about cows.
The globalist approach to governance pertains to humans reduced to generic 'cattle.' They are in fact, non-racist. Certainly, not hostile or hateful to a particular category of cow. They value cows for being cows...
The human world is replete with dysfunction and spuriously contrived justifications to adhere to ignorant selfishness and prideful ambition. This is most often effected as "imposed control."
No system is racist that does not explicitly invoke racial bias (and there are governments that do) - but even if a governments doesn't proclaim racial relevance to governance, the people working in it's name may. Racism is a social dysfunction, not a political one. It can be made political, but politics doesn't require racism as an existential component.
I understand the how racism has expressed itself in history. There are many lessons to learn from it, while we still have access to it unvarnished.
But in the end, racism is something more fundamental than identifying some excuse to separate people. If I mention racism in America, comments about blacks and whites surfaces to dominate the conversation. In India it would be very different; in China, even more so. Racism in Australia is a thing, but in Europe another.
Racism is a specific form of bias. Bias is manifested in a lot of ugly ways, race being only one.
Classism is usually denied by every upper-class in almost any society. It was once ignorantly embraced as 'self-evident' and 'natural.' Of late , we're seeing the problems it actually causes. And the upper classes can offer no solutions... while solutions proposed by lower-classes seem always to invoke the destruction of the upper-class.
What that tells us might seem self-evident.
Governance is expressed through the actions and policies of people... who can be both illogically biased, and pridefully inclined to exert their will.
Imagine a people who are obliged to 'obey' the government as 'authority' have no agency to change it.
Where there is no free speech they can't even talk about it.
Where there is fascism, any attempt to address it will be deemed a national threat (or a notional one.)
Where there is nationalism, they will be called traitorous anti-patriots.
But in all of that, racism is just a 'topping' flavor... a permanent fixture in any government that won't change.
Bias is the problem itself... racism is a flavor.
Truth is, we still have work to do...
Sorry, if I didn't quite meet the challenge of the OP. But I did try.
In that context, cattle ranchers are not racists... or specifically biased about cows.
The globalist approach to governance pertains to humans reduced to generic 'cattle.' They are in fact, non-racist. Certainly, not hostile or hateful to a particular category of cow. They value cows for being cows...
The human world is replete with dysfunction and spuriously contrived justifications to adhere to ignorant selfishness and prideful ambition. This is most often effected as "imposed control."
No system is racist that does not explicitly invoke racial bias (and there are governments that do) - but even if a governments doesn't proclaim racial relevance to governance, the people working in it's name may. Racism is a social dysfunction, not a political one. It can be made political, but politics doesn't require racism as an existential component.
I understand the how racism has expressed itself in history. There are many lessons to learn from it, while we still have access to it unvarnished.
But in the end, racism is something more fundamental than identifying some excuse to separate people. If I mention racism in America, comments about blacks and whites surfaces to dominate the conversation. In India it would be very different; in China, even more so. Racism in Australia is a thing, but in Europe another.
Racism is a specific form of bias. Bias is manifested in a lot of ugly ways, race being only one.
Classism is usually denied by every upper-class in almost any society. It was once ignorantly embraced as 'self-evident' and 'natural.' Of late , we're seeing the problems it actually causes. And the upper classes can offer no solutions... while solutions proposed by lower-classes seem always to invoke the destruction of the upper-class.
What that tells us might seem self-evident.
Governance is expressed through the actions and policies of people... who can be both illogically biased, and pridefully inclined to exert their will.
Imagine a people who are obliged to 'obey' the government as 'authority' have no agency to change it.
Where there is no free speech they can't even talk about it.
Where there is fascism, any attempt to address it will be deemed a national threat (or a notional one.)
Where there is nationalism, they will be called traitorous anti-patriots.
But in all of that, racism is just a 'topping' flavor... a permanent fixture in any government that won't change.
Bias is the problem itself... racism is a flavor.
Truth is, we still have work to do...
Sorry, if I didn't quite meet the challenge of the OP. But I did try.
