10-05-2024, 01:52 PM
This post was last modified 10-05-2024, 01:58 PM by UltraBudgie.
(10-05-2024, 01:39 PM)midicon Wrote: I didn't know that paper existed! I was just making a clever quip sort of but making a point.
It does make intuitive sense and I think it's reflected all around us.
I'll give the video a watch. Thank you.
I didn't know it existed either, until you inspired me to search for it! Thank you, I've already learned the words "androcratic" and "gylanic" from it, fun day hohoho!
Seerously though the paper makes some good points what i've read so far; and it is very interesting that we instinctively project bilateral dichotomies onto a male/female paradigm isn't it even though we all have brains!
Edit: whoah this bit totally synchonizes with a discussion i was having with maxmars about context!
Quote:For example, Thomas Kuhn argued that even science does not proceed primarily through the objective accumulation of impersonal facts, but through revolutions—paradigm shifts—in the way humans subjectively view those facts (Kuhn, 1966). Perhaps Kuhn’s most lasting contribution was the recognition that one cannot use the rationality of one’s own worldview to build steps to an incommensurable paradigm. Rather, one must empathically enter into the circle of the other in order to understand the other from within their world: their assumptions, values, methodologies, and definitions.
I followed the Science, and all I found was the Money.
