10-04-2024, 07:12 PM
Without members like you, and people like you... we would all end up oblivious to the facts of the past... while literally inviting them to repeat.
I find that there is absolutely no "foul" in openly analyzing what is offered up as 'news.' It is rationally imperative to do so.
The only people who do object, I have found, are those who want us to digest "news" exclusively as "pure information." Examples abound.
What you are doing isn't 'activism' it's counter-activism.
Without a counter... activism actually manifests as operating instructions, rather than information... examples abound.
Once the "new" journalism became a matter of "journalist fee fees and editorial fee fees" nearly all of it lost its value as information... except as an example of how NOT to "report" the news.
Should we ever stop, some people - somewhere - at some time are going to be lulled into the belief that "The government is always on top of the situation"...
here the truth is "The government is always on top of us." ... and an unchallenged media will always be their prime helper... examples abound.
I find that there is absolutely no "foul" in openly analyzing what is offered up as 'news.' It is rationally imperative to do so.
The only people who do object, I have found, are those who want us to digest "news" exclusively as "pure information." Examples abound.
What you are doing isn't 'activism' it's counter-activism.
Without a counter... activism actually manifests as operating instructions, rather than information... examples abound.
Once the "new" journalism became a matter of "journalist fee fees and editorial fee fees" nearly all of it lost its value as information... except as an example of how NOT to "report" the news.
Should we ever stop, some people - somewhere - at some time are going to be lulled into the belief that "The government is always on top of the situation"...
here the truth is "The government is always on top of us." ... and an unchallenged media will always be their prime helper... examples abound.