09-14-2024, 11:45 PM
(09-14-2024, 11:27 PM)Maxmars Wrote: It just goes to show that in the past there were those who hinged their own identities on the hatred of one group or other. It happens in most any society I can think of.
It bears an ugly message... but then hatred is if nothing else, always ugly.
We can call it by all manner of euphemisms... but it is an expression of simple hatred. Like most manifestos I have run across (not all.)
After reading though a second book that was listed, I noticed a trend on the use of the word "Jewish". I don't think they are referring to the Religion, but instead it seems like they are referring to a group. An example of this is George Soros, when attacked by facts he claims to be of Jewish heritage and dismisses the attack as "just antisemitism". Otherwise, he will openly dismiss Judaism and claim he's agnostic or a few times he has stated that he was an atheist.
I think this is the same context of many of the "Jewish" finger pointing taking place in these books. I also noticed that Rothchilds name would come up right before an anti-Jewish rant started. Weirdly I think that some of these writing may not be actual antisemitism, but sadly just a lack of knowing what else to label a group of people that happen to have people of Jewish Heritage in it.
I agree that it makes it hard to read and figure out what they are saying or if what they are writing "IS" what they are saying. In the other book written in the 1930s as well, it makes a reference to Lazard People. Do they mean Lizard People, that would be neat to have that reference dated back then, or do they mean those that follow the theories of Laissez-faire. I'll link that book if it has anything related to this one, but after reading "Protocals of Zion" I need a day or so.
I'm thinking of doing a massive "copy and paste" of the Zion book, and see if it makes better sense if words are replaced by modern terms that might better sense (and yes I was thinking "how would the book read if Jewish was replaced by Deep State").
