07-28-2024, 09:15 PM
This post was last modified 07-28-2024, 09:29 PM by IdeomotorPrisoner.
In a song?
Same rules apply as sexually charged shock rock. When I was young, I liked Marylin Manson specifically because people said all the disturbing crap he did. Him and Peter Steele.
This is exposure of gay subculture to the masses that weren't ready. When it was the 80s and it took place in NY Subways (Party Monster) and it was a daytime TV novelty or weird trans-kids. Still very much outsiders.
All I saw from that "desecration of Christian iconography" were Club Kids. The overthetop self-expression culture that started in the 80s and exploited transgressive behavior.
Or more up to date, "Burning Man," which is a bunch of weird French looking costumes in the desert. It's the Left-leaning expressive culture.
And it's sexualized, which I don't think is realized by everyone. They see their liberation, or some personal expression, but everyone else a sees a guy that didn't tape off his junk fully in what is seen as a perverted costume.
And that's what you get for trying to normalize the transgression of in your face sexual deviation. And it is. Though I echo "Get over it" sentiments, I'm not going to care if it offends people and they fight it. It wouldn't be humanity if they didn't.
And if there's going to be Christian Nationalism, it had a catalyst.
To simplify: The collective hive mind of LGBT concerns didn't think people were used to it yet.
They are going to play cultural Satan. As religion seeks to get them out of the limelight they are going to use shock tactics to transgress the christian status quo.
In sandskrit it would be a Vamachara reflex. Like instead of an aghori shocking hindu by covering themselves in ash and scaring children in graveyards, they do weird satires of DiVinci and Christianity.
That opening bit might as well be an aghori performance at a festival for Parvati.
Same rules apply as sexually charged shock rock. When I was young, I liked Marylin Manson specifically because people said all the disturbing crap he did. Him and Peter Steele.
This is exposure of gay subculture to the masses that weren't ready. When it was the 80s and it took place in NY Subways (Party Monster) and it was a daytime TV novelty or weird trans-kids. Still very much outsiders.
All I saw from that "desecration of Christian iconography" were Club Kids. The overthetop self-expression culture that started in the 80s and exploited transgressive behavior.
Or more up to date, "Burning Man," which is a bunch of weird French looking costumes in the desert. It's the Left-leaning expressive culture.
And it's sexualized, which I don't think is realized by everyone. They see their liberation, or some personal expression, but everyone else a sees a guy that didn't tape off his junk fully in what is seen as a perverted costume.
And that's what you get for trying to normalize the transgression of in your face sexual deviation. And it is. Though I echo "Get over it" sentiments, I'm not going to care if it offends people and they fight it. It wouldn't be humanity if they didn't.
And if there's going to be Christian Nationalism, it had a catalyst.
To simplify: The collective hive mind of LGBT concerns didn't think people were used to it yet.
They are going to play cultural Satan. As religion seeks to get them out of the limelight they are going to use shock tactics to transgress the christian status quo.
In sandskrit it would be a Vamachara reflex. Like instead of an aghori shocking hindu by covering themselves in ash and scaring children in graveyards, they do weird satires of DiVinci and Christianity.
That opening bit might as well be an aghori performance at a festival for Parvati.
![[Image: ru671fd228.jpg]](https://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/ru671fd228.jpg)
