07-23-2024, 09:05 PM
This post was last modified 07-23-2024, 09:08 PM by VulcanWerks.
I’ve seen several outlets and commenters around the web discuss how Trump’s shooter was in a BlackRock (BR) commercial - this BR is somehow involved with the attempt on Trump’s life.
I don’t think that BR was involved and the fact the shooter was in a commercial is pure coincidence. Lots of people have been in random videos. My wife randomly ended up in a music video once, for instance. She doesn’t know the artist and they needed someone so there she was.
Point being that the shooter could have ended up in that shoot for all kinds of reasons that are entirely benign.
However, since many on the interwebs have looked to somehow tie BR into it I have to at least explore that angle for a moment.
For it to “make sense” that BR was somehow involved in this plot to shoot Trump, I think the “plan” or “story” would look something like this:
BR decides to do commercials and highlight teachers. Makes sense for their business and gives them a good guy image.
They probably viewed a dozen creatives and finally what you saw in the video was the winner. They found a teacher that fits the narrative and went to the school to shoot the footage.
The marketing creative called for the use of students. Again, like the teacher, they needed students who fit the mold. Some combination of students were identified.
This is where things change.
We know they used real students as the shooter proves that. Some process was deployed to get the students. Some looked the part and since they didn’t have to do much that’s really all thats needed.
If you’re a HS student, you probably want to be “cool” and more visible - being in a commercial could be a feather in your cap. Even if not true, there was likely the interest in being in the commercial exceeded the number of people the commercial needed.
If you’re BR, you likely background check a number of students before putting them in the commercial.
And that is the connection.
All BR had to do was have a member of the “team” join as a “consultant” to “get to know” the students involved. This consultant could be directly connected to who wanted someone recruited. You’ve already don’t a background and probably have some assistance from .gov because you’re looking for students that meet the right criteria to being them in to be used in many ways not by BR but by someone who might want Trump shot.
This would be incredibly easy to add a “contractor” for this purpose under a whole bunch of false pretenses that are very believable.
If BR did a series of commercials like the one that contained the shooter, they could have background information of hundreds of impressionable teenagers.
Once the right student(s) is identified, they can be further tested/screened. How do they behave? If we give them small amounts of information do they talk about it online? Trustworthy? Reliable?
Note: The shooter had a very very small social media presence.
From there the individual gets an unglamorous job that doesn’t have a lot of upward mobility and in the background train and prepare them for this occasion. Brainwash the shooter with “inside information” and threats of action against non-compliance.
A puppet assassin who is not a well known or visible individual and of unnotable repute, if you will.
So, BlackRock’s job was the intake specialist (in this story). To be fair, they have something to lose by having Trump get back in office - never mind all of the institutions connected to BR that rely on BR to facilitate their agendas (at least in part).
That may also mean there’s more like the shooter (or were). It’s a program of sorts.
To sum it up, the radicalization starts by putting someone who is of the right combination of things in a commercial, make them feel special and then turn them into a useful tool as you need them.
And when they fail, eliminate them.
While that’s a logical and somewhat believable story that doesn’t have many theatrics or much hyperbole to it, I still don’t think that’s the case - or really anything like it.
The fact the guy was in a commercial is just a coincidence. Nothing exciting unless you’re a member of upper BR leadership. :)
I don’t think that BR was involved and the fact the shooter was in a commercial is pure coincidence. Lots of people have been in random videos. My wife randomly ended up in a music video once, for instance. She doesn’t know the artist and they needed someone so there she was.
Point being that the shooter could have ended up in that shoot for all kinds of reasons that are entirely benign.
However, since many on the interwebs have looked to somehow tie BR into it I have to at least explore that angle for a moment.
For it to “make sense” that BR was somehow involved in this plot to shoot Trump, I think the “plan” or “story” would look something like this:
BR decides to do commercials and highlight teachers. Makes sense for their business and gives them a good guy image.
They probably viewed a dozen creatives and finally what you saw in the video was the winner. They found a teacher that fits the narrative and went to the school to shoot the footage.
The marketing creative called for the use of students. Again, like the teacher, they needed students who fit the mold. Some combination of students were identified.
This is where things change.
We know they used real students as the shooter proves that. Some process was deployed to get the students. Some looked the part and since they didn’t have to do much that’s really all thats needed.
If you’re a HS student, you probably want to be “cool” and more visible - being in a commercial could be a feather in your cap. Even if not true, there was likely the interest in being in the commercial exceeded the number of people the commercial needed.
If you’re BR, you likely background check a number of students before putting them in the commercial.
And that is the connection.
All BR had to do was have a member of the “team” join as a “consultant” to “get to know” the students involved. This consultant could be directly connected to who wanted someone recruited. You’ve already don’t a background and probably have some assistance from .gov because you’re looking for students that meet the right criteria to being them in to be used in many ways not by BR but by someone who might want Trump shot.
This would be incredibly easy to add a “contractor” for this purpose under a whole bunch of false pretenses that are very believable.
If BR did a series of commercials like the one that contained the shooter, they could have background information of hundreds of impressionable teenagers.
Once the right student(s) is identified, they can be further tested/screened. How do they behave? If we give them small amounts of information do they talk about it online? Trustworthy? Reliable?
Note: The shooter had a very very small social media presence.
From there the individual gets an unglamorous job that doesn’t have a lot of upward mobility and in the background train and prepare them for this occasion. Brainwash the shooter with “inside information” and threats of action against non-compliance.
A puppet assassin who is not a well known or visible individual and of unnotable repute, if you will.
So, BlackRock’s job was the intake specialist (in this story). To be fair, they have something to lose by having Trump get back in office - never mind all of the institutions connected to BR that rely on BR to facilitate their agendas (at least in part).
That may also mean there’s more like the shooter (or were). It’s a program of sorts.
To sum it up, the radicalization starts by putting someone who is of the right combination of things in a commercial, make them feel special and then turn them into a useful tool as you need them.
And when they fail, eliminate them.
While that’s a logical and somewhat believable story that doesn’t have many theatrics or much hyperbole to it, I still don’t think that’s the case - or really anything like it.
The fact the guy was in a commercial is just a coincidence. Nothing exciting unless you’re a member of upper BR leadership. :)
(07-23-2024, 09:05 PM)VulcanWerks Wrote: I’ve seen several outlets and commenters around the web discuss how Trump’s shooter was in a BlackRock (BR) commercial - this BR is somehow involved with the attempt on Trump’s life.
I don’t think that BR was involved and the fact the shooter was in a commercial is pure coincidence. Lots of people have been in random videos. My wife randomly ended up in a music video once, for instance. She doesn’t know the artist and they needed someone so there she was.
Point being that the shooter could have ended up in that shoot for all kinds of reasons that are entirely benign.
However, since many on the interwebs have looked to somehow tie BR into it I have to at least explore that angle for a moment.
For it to “make sense” that BR was somehow involved in this plot to shoot Trump, I think the “plan” or “story” would look something like this:
BR decides to do commercials and highlight teachers. Makes sense for their business and gives them a good guy image.
They probably viewed a dozen creatives and finally what you saw in the video was the winner. They found a teacher that fits the narrative and went to the school to shoot the footage.
The marketing creative called for the use of students. Again, like the teacher, they needed students who fit the mold. Some combination of students were identified.
This is where things change.
We know they used real students as the shooter proves that. Some process was deployed to get the students. Some looked the part and since they didn’t have to do much that’s really all thats needed.
If you’re a HS student, you probably want to be “cool” and more visible - being in a commercial could be a feather in your cap. Even if not true, there was likely the interest in being in the commercial exceeded the number of people the commercial needed.
If you’re BR, you likely background check a number of students before putting them in the commercial.
And that is the connection.
All BR had to do was have a member of the “team” join as a “consultant” to “get to know” the students involved. This consultant could be directly connected to who wanted someone recruited. You’ve already got a background and probably have some assistance from .gov because you’re looking for students that meet the right criteria to being them in to be used in many ways not by BR but by someone who might want Trump shot.
This would be incredibly easy to add a “contractor” for this purpose under a whole bunch of false pretenses that are very believable.
If BR did a series of commercials like the one that contained the shooter, they could have background information of hundreds of impressionable teenagers.
Once the right student(s) is identified, they can be further tested/screened. How do they behave? If we give them small amounts of information do they talk about it online? Trustworthy? Reliable?
Note: The shooter had a very very small social media presence.
From there the individual gets an unglamorous job that doesn’t have a lot of upward mobility and in the background train and prepare them for this occasion. Brainwash the shooter with “inside information” and threats of action against non-compliance.
A puppet assassin who is not a well known or visible individual and of unnotable repute, if you will.
So, BlackRock’s job was the intake specialist (in this story). To be fair, they have something to lose by having Trump get back in office - never mind all of the institutions connected to BR that rely on BR to facilitate their agendas (at least in part).
That may also mean there’s more like the shooter (or were). It’s a program of sorts.
To sum it up, the radicalization starts by putting someone who is of the right combination of things in a commercial, make them feel special and then turn them into a useful tool as you need them.
And when they fail, eliminate them.
While that’s a logical and somewhat believable story that doesn’t have many theatrics or much hyperbole to it, I still don’t think that’s the case - or really anything like it.
The fact the guy was in a commercial is just a coincidence. Nothing exciting unless you’re a member of upper BR leadership. :)
