06-20-2024, 11:14 PM
(06-20-2024, 08:54 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I think I am uncomfortable with the comparison between the terms of Reagan and Biden as being "more challenging" to an aging mind. I don't think either President "had it easier," help notwithstanding. Without going into histrionics, Regan's time was at least as difficult as Biden's, multiplied by two.If the President is overly concerned with the press they are likely a lousy President to begin with. Not to mention Reagan's issues appeared in his 2nd term, we aren't even through Biden's 1st term, a 2nd term could be an extremely bumpy ride.
The main difference in my perception of them is that while Regan was an experienced actor and well suited to "playing a role" as a professional, Biden's 'playing a role' just comes off less polished and focused on "surface appearances." As if a committee were responsible for programming his character and conduct. The media was kinder to the aging Biden, firmly demonstrating that he requires 'special' marketing and PR help from them (and it was given in abundance, to include a concerted and directed effort against any and all detractors, in the most publicly visible way...)
Both Presidents deteriorated through their respective terms. Reagan was just a better performer. That may or may not translate to a better 'image projecting' public servant, but nowadays, some believe that 'you only have to "look good" to b effective. (At any rate, 'modern' politicians are simply of 'diminished' stature when one considers what have they actually 'done' as opposed to what they 'promise' to do.)
And history is replete with examples of Biden saying 'whatever it takes' to manipulate a useful narrative... remember, before his Obama time, Biden was a laughing stock in the media for his outright lies and plagiarism, as well as several instances of verbal blunders. Reagan had no such press in his history, or at least, nothing remotely comparable.
Not only that but I was referring to what was/is occurring in the world at the time of thier respective diminished capabilities.
Russia wasn't a threat that it is today. We could be a few errant missiles from having to defend NATO
Ronnie had some attacks like the USS Cole from Iran but they didn't shoot dozens and dozens of missiles toward Israel. Israel is being immediately threatened by Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran while getting uncertain and mixed messages from the Biden Administration. Of course, we had Israel and Lebanon in the 80s too, it just didn't seem as critical as it does now. We certainly didn't have the anti-Semitic protests in the US, there is a lot this administration has to negotiate with.
Let's not forget we also had the George Sr. as VP, who flawed as he was didn't give the country a collective case of the heebie jeebies if he had to assume the Presidency.
Lastly, though this is more about Obama, and my rationalization he is atleast being consulted and can perhaps guide the Biden administration
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart