Las Vegas cyber truck a false flag?

[KKLoco]

This was posted on ATS. I found it to be quite compelling.

[KKLoco]

Another ptsd vet? Or whistleblower?

I know he’s going to get s… and a nickname from this:

Twitter video of soldiers talking about alien encounter

That video is straight up bizarre. I’d like to know the context behind it. Looks like it was a while ago as they are referring to Obama as being president.

[pianopraze]

That video is straight up bizarre. I’d like to know the context behind it. Looks like it was a while ago as they are referring to Obama as being president.

Agree on the timeline.

ever seen it posted before or are we in mass whistleblower timeframe where everyone telling / posting what they know/have heard?

[sahgwa]

That video is straight up bizarre. I’d like to know the context behind it. Looks like it was a while ago as they are referring to Obama as being president.

Just some privates and a specialist fucking around in their free time. Means nothing.

[sahgwa]

Here's a link to an analysis of an email sent by Berg on December 31. There are many issues that point to it being fabricated. Among those were: He was wrong describing his first car, used some military acronyms incorrectly.

He had no special knowledge of drones, was not of the military rank to be targeting in Afghanistan, and the civilian targeting there was well know published information.

He wrote that he was under surveillance, but took no countermeasures, and seemingly thought the fireworks, gasoline, and propane in his car made,an awesome bomb.

https://twitter.com/GBNT1952/status/1875...nI-Fw&s=19

Thanks for linking that - going to repost them in order so we can view them easily:

'The main piece of information that does not fit into any plausible explanation of the Las Vegas Bombing, allegedly by Matthew Livelsberger, is this email. Let's do a deep dive, a thread:
The first and most important reason is that the bona fides used in the email are incorrect. The entire purpose of bona fides is to prove you are who you say you are, so using fake or wrong bona fides literally implies that nothing in this email can be trusted. Matthew Livelsberger never owned a 06 Mustang, as you can see in the vehicle registration report below provided by
@Landryy22
. This also coincides with source information I have received from people that knew Matt in High School and claimed his first vehicle was a 1998 Mustang, not a 2006 Mustang. The models of these Mustangs are also entirely different, so there is no confusing them, and a person with the experience of Matt would not have messed up this very important aspect of bona fides in what is essentially his final attempt to get his story out.
(Vehicle records supposedly do not match)

The second reason is that a career Green Beret with the experience and training Matt received, would not have the second line of the email state that he was "not under duress or hostile influence or control." He was a Jedburgh, meaning he went through highly specified training in HUMINT, tradecraft, and Psychological Operations. He would know that making such a statement would raise red flags such as the following: 1. It raises unnecessary suspicion and inadvertently draws attention to the possibility that you actually are under duress or operating under influence. 2. It is considered overcompensation by volunteering information that was unprompted or not requested and would imply that you are not in a competent mental state, making your follow-on statement seem unconvincing. 3. This statement could also be considered as a way to create a paper trail that fits in with a specified narrative. Matt would know this and would not have wanted to make his attempted whistle blowing seem crazy or made up.

The third reason is that he was, by all accounts, not in an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP) related to the drones he speaks of in line three according to team members and others that operated with him, despite him saying so at the end of the email. He claims to have Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) qualifications in his LinkedIn, which is a team or operational unit level drone training qualification for drones that are under 55lbs with limited capabilities. Many teams train with drones that would fall under a SUAS qualification, as they are used for battlefield reconnoitering or even for target acquisitions and kinetic strikes with small explosive payloads. None of this would imply that he was read on to a Top-Secret government program that would be researching and developing gravitic propulsion systems, as stated in the email. In fact, such a program would be so heavily compartmentalized that only people directly involved with the specific Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) USAP project would be read on and able to access information about this, if it even exists. So, where did this come from and why add this in if it only makes you look crazy and uninformed? Suspect for sure.


The fourth reason is that the next three lines read like something straight out of anti-China MSM talking points, rambling about the east coast drones and Chinese submarines by someone who clearly has no information or expertise on the subject. For one, the drones being Chinese launched from Chinese submarines is highly unlikely. The U.S. Navy has sophisticated submarine detection systems that include Long Range Acoustic Detection Systems (LRADS) that utilize hydrophones to detect anomalous incursions by submerged vehicles, satellite surveillance, advanced sonar, and underwater drones. Not to mention, if China were to fly drones openly in America, that would be an actual act of war, and I just find it hard to believe that they would take that step. For an example of catching some of these drones, a Chinese drone was just recently detected and recovered in Philippine water by their Navy which is far less advanced than our own. If Chinese subs or underwater drones were operating along our east coast, the USG would undoubtedly be aware of this, and Matt would know and understand that stating this seems crazy.

The fifth reason is the following line states: "I have been followed for over a week now from likely homeland or FBI, and they are looking to move on me...I have a massive VBIED. I've been trying to maintain a very visible profile and have kept my phone and they are definitely digitally tracking me." If you are this concerned about being tracked by homeland or the FBI (which are the same federal entities at this point and can badge however they want depending on the purpose), why would you do the following, which are clear breaches of Survive Evade Resist Escape (SERE), a course he would have taken, and tradecraft 101? 1. Why would you keep your phone on you and continue to allow them to track you, especially if you had a "massive VBIED" (which obviously he did not have, he had a two-bit redneck conglomeration of mortar fireworks, gas, and campfire fueling canisters put together as if he were a child). This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. 2. Why would you rent a rolling, live-streaming, trackable computer such as a Tesla Cybertruck to begin your evasion on a digital site such as Turo? Matt was a highly trained SF operator and a Jed. He would know and understand what a Surveillance Detection Route (SDR) was and how to use one effectively. He would also not use a vehicle that needed to be recharged at continuously video monitored recharging stations multiple times along his route. And lastly, he would not have used a service tied to his own name to rent the vehicle that could easily be tracked and monitored if he were genuinely concerned that the FBI and Homeland were on him. 3. Why would you make initial contact with all of these people on your personal Instagram (IG) account if you were worried about surveillance and monitoring, and then why would you switch to a Proton Mail (PM) account (which would be used for anonymity) that used a name you have previously used on IG? This page has recently been deleted, but
@GrokstarXai
found the post below with some digging. As you can see, @dabergmlb was the username used which matches his PM account. An operator with the training that Matt received would know better than to do anything while in evasion mode that would link his current clean evasion state to any profile that identifies him. It simply makes no sense.

The sixth reason is that the email itself contains a ton of misnomers or flat-out wrong information. For instance, the email states "USFORA" which is an acronym for United States Forces Afghanistan. Someone at his level, especially as an ODA member in 2019, would have been working under the Special Operations Joint Task Force-Afghanistan (SOJTF-A) at the highest level, and he would have known this. USFORA would be used by conventional forces, but the more well-known and common name would have been Resolute Support Mission (RSM) or Operation Resolute Support. Again, weird word usage to come from a Special Operations guy. Check out http://arsof-history.org for more information: Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Afghanistan (CJSOTF-A) Timeline

The seventh reason is that the entire paragraph about war crimes in 2019 is absolutely bonkers. Even if he was doing targeting (which he probably was not as an 18E or 18F on an ODA, depending on which he was at the time), this information is already known public news. It is common knowledge that the United States dropped a record number of bombs in 2019 in Afghanistan, and it is also already public knowledge that civilian casualties exceeded those caused by the Taliban during the first six months of 2019. Matt would have known this and alluding to this being some smoking gun that would get him in contact with higher is to put it mildly, laughable

The eighth reason is that there are formatting inconsistencies in the email and despite numerous requests,
@samosaur
has yet to provide a view of the email with technical data from Proton Mail outside of a text editor. For an example of a formatting inconsistency, if you look at the bottom of the email posted, there is a space between < [email protected]>, where there should not be a space. It should look like the one at the top of the email. Also, Sam posted the header as shown below, but again, he posted it from a text editor and not attached to the actual email he received. We have asked multiple times for either a video of him opening the email with the technical data visible to see, or for a PDF of the email with all of the technical data available. He could still redact the names from this email with either of those options, yet he has continuously refused or ignored requests to do so. Another weird thing is that AI is saying the images provided about the IG messages have been digitally altered as pointed out by
@boneGPT
. Some answers about this are necessary.

The ninth and final reason is that the manifesto found on his phone in the vehicle after the explosion and the email are most likely written by two different people as originally pointed out by
@KyleSeraphin
who has tons of investigative experience. The truck manifesto reads as if written by a career Green Beret that has many of the common views and concerns of many of us that have seen the fighting force diminish, while the email reads as a crazy uninformed person writing to fulfil a conspiracy theory narrative about World War III and other MSM talking points. And AI agrees, as pointed out by
@OV_Matter
who had AI diagnose both the truck manifesto and the email.

Here is the Truck Manifesto as opposed to the email 

[KKLoco]

Thanks for linking that - going to repost them in order so we can view them easily:

'The main piece of information that does not fit into any plausible explanation of the Las Vegas Bombing, allegedly by Matthew Livelsberger, is this email. Let's do a deep dive, a thread:
The first and most important reason is that the bona fides used in the email are incorrect. The entire purpose of bona fides is to prove you are who you say you are, so using fake or wrong bona fides literally implies that nothing in this email can be trusted. Matthew Livelsberger never owned a 06 Mustang, as you can see in the vehicle registration report below provided by
@Landryy22
. This also coincides with source information I have received from people that knew Matt in High School and claimed his first vehicle was a 1998 Mustang, not a 2006 Mustang. The models of these Mustangs are also entirely different, so there is no confusing them, and a person with the experience of Matt would not have messed up this very important aspect of bona fides in what is essentially his final attempt to get his story out.
(Vehicle records supposedly do not match)

The second reason is that a career Green Beret with the experience and training Matt received, would not have the second line of the email state that he was "not under duress or hostile influence or control." He was a Jedburgh, meaning he went through highly specified training in HUMINT, tradecraft, and Psychological Operations. He would know that making such a statement would raise red flags such as the following: 1. It raises unnecessary suspicion and inadvertently draws attention to the possibility that you actually are under duress or operating under influence. 2. It is considered overcompensation by volunteering information that was unprompted or not requested and would imply that you are not in a competent mental state, making your follow-on statement seem unconvincing. 3. This statement could also be considered as a way to create a paper trail that fits in with a specified narrative. Matt would know this and would not have wanted to make his attempted whistle blowing seem crazy or made up.

The third reason is that he was, by all accounts, not in an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP) related to the drones he speaks of in line three according to team members and others that operated with him, despite him saying so at the end of the email. He claims to have Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) qualifications in his LinkedIn, which is a team or operational unit level drone training qualification for drones that are under 55lbs with limited capabilities. Many teams train with drones that would fall under a SUAS qualification, as they are used for battlefield reconnoitering or even for target acquisitions and kinetic strikes with small explosive payloads. None of this would imply that he was read on to a Top-Secret government program that would be researching and developing gravitic propulsion systems, as stated in the email. In fact, such a program would be so heavily compartmentalized that only people directly involved with the specific Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) USAP project would be read on and able to access information about this, if it even exists. So, where did this come from and why add this in if it only makes you look crazy and uninformed? Suspect for sure.


The fourth reason is that the next three lines read like something straight out of anti-China MSM talking points, rambling about the east coast drones and Chinese submarines by someone who clearly has no information or expertise on the subject. For one, the drones being Chinese launched from Chinese submarines is highly unlikely. The U.S. Navy has sophisticated submarine detection systems that include Long Range Acoustic Detection Systems (LRADS) that utilize hydrophones to detect anomalous incursions by submerged vehicles, satellite surveillance, advanced sonar, and underwater drones. Not to mention, if China were to fly drones openly in America, that would be an actual act of war, and I just find it hard to believe that they would take that step. For an example of catching some of these drones, a Chinese drone was just recently detected and recovered in Philippine water by their Navy which is far less advanced than our own. If Chinese subs or underwater drones were operating along our east coast, the USG would undoubtedly be aware of this, and Matt would know and understand that stating this seems crazy.

The fifth reason is the following line states: "I have been followed for over a week now from likely homeland or FBI, and they are looking to move on me...I have a massive VBIED. I've been trying to maintain a very visible profile and have kept my phone and they are definitely digitally tracking me." If you are this concerned about being tracked by homeland or the FBI (which are the same federal entities at this point and can badge however they want depending on the purpose), why would you do the following, which are clear breaches of Survive Evade Resist Escape (SERE), a course he would have taken, and tradecraft 101? 1. Why would you keep your phone on you and continue to allow them to track you, especially if you had a "massive VBIED" (which obviously he did not have, he had a two-bit redneck conglomeration of mortar fireworks, gas, and campfire fueling canisters put together as if he were a child). This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. 2. Why would you rent a rolling, live-streaming, trackable computer such as a Tesla Cybertruck to begin your evasion on a digital site such as Turo? Matt was a highly trained SF operator and a Jed. He would know and understand what a Surveillance Detection Route (SDR) was and how to use one effectively. He would also not use a vehicle that needed to be recharged at continuously video monitored recharging stations multiple times along his route. And lastly, he would not have used a service tied to his own name to rent the vehicle that could easily be tracked and monitored if he were genuinely concerned that the FBI and Homeland were on him. 3. Why would you make initial contact with all of these people on your personal Instagram (IG) account if you were worried about surveillance and monitoring, and then why would you switch to a Proton Mail (PM) account (which would be used for anonymity) that used a name you have previously used on IG? This page has recently been deleted, but
@GrokstarXai
found the post below with some digging. As you can see, @dabergmlb was the username used which matches his PM account. An operator with the training that Matt received would know better than to do anything while in evasion mode that would link his current clean evasion state to any profile that identifies him. It simply makes no sense.

The sixth reason is that the email itself contains a ton of misnomers or flat-out wrong information. For instance, the email states "USFORA" which is an acronym for United States Forces Afghanistan. Someone at his level, especially as an ODA member in 2019, would have been working under the Special Operations Joint Task Force-Afghanistan (SOJTF-A) at the highest level, and he would have known this. USFORA would be used by conventional forces, but the more well-known and common name would have been Resolute Support Mission (RSM) or Operation Resolute Support. Again, weird word usage to come from a Special Operations guy. Check out http://arsof-history.org for more information: Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Afghanistan (CJSOTF-A) Timeline

The seventh reason is that the entire paragraph about war crimes in 2019 is absolutely bonkers. Even if he was doing targeting (which he probably was not as an 18E or 18F on an ODA, depending on which he was at the time), this information is already known public news. It is common knowledge that the United States dropped a record number of bombs in 2019 in Afghanistan, and it is also already public knowledge that civilian casualties exceeded those caused by the Taliban during the first six months of 2019. Matt would have known this and alluding to this being some smoking gun that would get him in contact with higher is to put it mildly, laughable

The eighth reason is that there are formatting inconsistencies in the email and despite numerous requests,
@samosaur
has yet to provide a view of the email with technical data from Proton Mail outside of a text editor. For an example of a formatting inconsistency, if you look at the bottom of the email posted, there is a space between < [email protected]>, where there should not be a space. It should look like the one at the top of the email. Also, Sam posted the header as shown below, but again, he posted it from a text editor and not attached to the actual email he received. We have asked multiple times for either a video of him opening the email with the technical data visible to see, or for a PDF of the email with all of the technical data available. He could still redact the names from this email with either of those options, yet he has continuously refused or ignored requests to do so. Another weird thing is that AI is saying the images provided about the IG messages have been digitally altered as pointed out by
@boneGPT
. Some answers about this are necessary.

The ninth and final reason is that the manifesto found on his phone in the vehicle after the explosion and the email are most likely written by two different people as originally pointed out by
@KyleSeraphin
who has tons of investigative experience. The truck manifesto reads as if written by a career Green Beret that has many of the common views and concerns of many of us that have seen the fighting force diminish, while the email reads as a crazy uninformed person writing to fulfil a conspiracy theory narrative about World War III and other MSM talking points. And AI agrees, as pointed out by
@OV_Matter
who had AI diagnose both the truck manifesto and the email.

Here is the Truck Manifesto as opposed to the email 

Great write up. So what’s your thoughts on where the email originated?

[sahgwa]

Great write up. So what’s your thoughts on where the email originated?

My off the cuff gut feeling says 'the government.' like either the same group that 'actually' drove the truck and detonated the fireworks and pretended to be him, or it's even possible it was some crazy person that knew Livelsberger and was trying to muddy the waters for their own (alien/UAP) agenda? 
Who is this Sam/Shoe guy who shared the email first?

The thing about this is that none of it seems to have a clear motive.

[KKLoco]

My off the cuff gut feeling says 'the government.' like either the same group that 'actually' drove the truck and detonated the fireworks and pretended to be him, or it's even possible it was some crazy person that knew Livelsberger and was trying to muddy the waters for their own (alien/UAP) agenda? 
Who is this Sam/Shoe guy who shared the email first?

The thing about this is that none of it seems to have a clear motive.

I agree, for what purpose. 

It’s being reported now that he had a traumatic brain injury while deployed. His ex girlfriend said it changed him and that’s why she broke up with him. Maybe he just had a screw loose.

[pianopraze]

Someone posted this in comment…

false flag or chain of whistleblowers?

was the original false flag?

is this false flag?

update: Congressman Tim Burchett has reached out to her:

might going to get spicy!

[sahgwa]

update: Congressman Tim Burchett has reached out to her:

might going to get spicy!

I foresee the usual, locals fighting Feds, and Feds fighting each other. 
We need to trim down the Federal Government to pre 1800 levels.