Login to account Create an account  


Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Timeline To The End
#1
I understand the need for specifics, especially in times as uncertain as these. The events that lie ahead are pivotal, and it’s crucial to be prepared for what’s coming. Below, I’ve outlined more detailed predictions, aligning with the broader warnings I’ve shared previously. These events will serve as markers on the path toward the potential catastrophe in 2026.

1. November 2024: A Divisive Election
  • The U.S. presidential election concludes with a highly unexpected outcome. The winning candidate, previously considered a long shot, will rise to power amidst claims of election manipulation and widespread voter suppression. This victory will not only surprise the general public but also sow deep discord within the political establishment.
2. January 2025: The Inauguration Unrest
  • As the new president is inaugurated, the nation will face intense protests, some of which will escalate into violent confrontations. Major cities will become flashpoints for these conflicts, with Washington, D.C., and other political centers seeing the most severe disturbances. The National Guard will be deployed in unprecedented numbers, yet this will only deepen the divisions within the country.
3. Spring 2025: Diplomatic Breakdown
  • The new administration will adopt an aggressive foreign policy stance, abandoning key treaties and alliances that have maintained a fragile peace for decades. Diplomatic relations with several major powers, including Russia and China, will rapidly deteriorate. Military posturing will replace negotiation, and the world will edge closer to a global conflict.
4. Fall 2025: The Brink of War
  • By late 2025, tensions in contested regions like Eastern Europe and the South China Sea will reach a critical point. A series of military provocations, including naval skirmishes and cyberattacks, will push the world’s superpowers to the brink of war. At home, the American public will remain deeply divided, with a growing sense of dread as international tensions escalate.
5. Early 2026: The Spark
  • A critical incident will occur, either an accidental missile launch or a large-scale terrorist attack attributed to a state actor. This event will ignite the conflict that has been simmering for years. Retaliation will be swift and brutal, involving nuclear strikes that will devastate major cities around the globe. The world will descend into chaos as governments struggle to maintain control amid the destruction.
6. Mid-2026: Aftermath and Survival
  • The nuclear exchanges of 2026 will leave the world in ruins. Millions will perish in the initial blasts, with countless more succumbing to radiation, disease, and the collapse of infrastructure. The United States, like much of the world, will be fractured, with survivors facing a harsh and uncertain future. The geopolitical landscape will be unrecognizable, with power vacuums leading to further conflict and instability.
These events are not set in stone, but they represent the most likely outcomes if current trajectories are not altered. The decisions made now—by leaders and citizens alike—will determine whether we veer away from this disastrous path or march headlong into it.

Stay vigilant, stay informed, and above all, be prepared. The future is still within our hands, but the window to change it is closing rapidly.

-John
Reply
#2
I'm not a time traveller but I fancy Trump will win and the Democrats won't accept the result. They will do what they did last time, that is, cause pandemonium and chaos in the inner cities. More than likely far worse as they have learned from that previous time.

I also think with Trump in charge there will be an end to the Ukraine fiasco. No one will have a nuclear war and we might have more peace in the world.

Having said that, the MIC need to have a conflict so it's likely Iran will be the new bogeyman. That might eat up a few years whilst another conflict is being created elsewhere.

I don't believe in time travel though and all you have is a pessimistic view and predictions anyone could make. We both know you are not a time traveller.
Reply
#3
I've held my tongue long enough, smh at this BS. 

Back in the day I found the 'Titor' hoax to be interesting, not from a supposed 'time travel' angle, but more from a 'gullibility of the masses' type angle.

I find it interesting that no matter what the question may be, Titor had an answer for it, but all of his answers could be found in our current scientific understanding. He could never give us a 'revelation', only regurgitated theories that we already had available to us.

So, just for the hell of it, I'd like to challenge you to a debate, not about any one topic, (you being a time traveller), which is of course preposterous, but on the accuracy and veracity of your past claims, whether they be about predictions or technology, etc.

I think FIRST and FOREMOST you explain all of your past predictions and explanations, THEN, if you're not annihilated with the questions from your past appearance, you can move on and post some fresh BS about our future.

What do you say space cadet?

LOL
Reply
#4
(08-16-2024, 07:59 AM)MykeNukem Wrote: I've held my tongue long enough, smh at this BS. 

Back in the day I found the 'Titor' hoax to be interesting, not from a supposed 'time travel' angle, but more from a 'gullibility of the masses' type angle.

I find it interesting that no matter what the question may be, Titor had an answer for it, but all of his answers could be found in our current scientific understanding. He could never give us a 'revelation', only regurgitated theories that we already had available to us.

So, just for the hell of it, I'd like to challenge you to a debate, not about any one topic, (you being a time traveller), which is of course preposterous, but on the accuracy and veracity of your past claims, whether they be about predictions or technology, etc.

I think FIRST and FOREMOST you explain all of your past predictions and explanations, THEN, if you're not annihilated with the questions from your past appearance, you can move on and post some fresh BS about our future.

What do you say space cadet?

LOL

Space Cadet? No, a Sky Pilot 1st Degree.

I just love the political Trump spin but guess what? Trump isn't a threat to democracy nor the world. Since your obviously backing the Democratic National Committee in 2024 you should send your resume into team Harris as a Staff Writer. So if that goes no where you can try the WEC, WHO, UN and the Bilderberg Group. 

You should try a write on; will Kim Jong Un Make America Great Again?
Reply
#5
Don't feed the trolls. TT, go away. Really. Just go away.
Everything hurts and I'm tired.
Reply
#6
I don't have the benefit of having personally experienced your past postings, and thought rather that people would be interested in going over the things you had once said.  But I see that many are acquainted well enough to wish you to be silent.  I don't.  However, I'm not aligned with the doom porn many seem to be stricken with, so I was in observation-mode, until now....

But I find lists 'inviting'...

1. November 2024: A Divisive Election

All elections are divisive by definition.  A highly unexpected outcome is always the case for everyone whose choice of candidate fails to win the position.  Generally speaking, everyone votes for the candidate they want to succeed, so a loss registers as a 'surprise' for most of them.

2. January 2025: The Inauguration Unrest

US partisan politics has become increasingly (and theatrically) combative, in the ugliest "soap opera/world-wide wrestling" way.  They attack in a public relations battlefield over personalities and tropes... of late some parties (ahem) are spectacle-oriented, and "appearance"-driven (by their own admission.)  Thus political "unrest" becomes a media production... and 'activist' journalists ensure the appearances bear whatever 'message' they wish to 'insert' into the construct... with ample editorial support.

During the height of public "disturbances" in the recent past, the National Guard actions were only invoked to further craft an image... they served no remediation to the actual events.  Will it be different now?  I reserve some doubts because Governors are mostly 'political' as well... and they don't answer to people first... it's ALWAYS party first.  They even take "oaths" to that effect.

3. Spring 2025: Diplomatic Breakdown

Peace is neither "robust" nor "fragile."  Peace is a state of affairs.  That has not changed ever.  Only the players who foist threats control "peace."  Diplomatic relations are actually not "between" states any longer... it's between business interests, and economic intentions.  Our relationships with China and Russia are about cabals of power within those countries and in our own... the people are largely extraneous to the 'diplomatic relations.'  "Military posturing" is for appearances only.  It evokes spending... (ahem, again.)

4. Fall 2025: The Brink of War

The world, as advertised, is ALWAYS on the "brink of war."  (Unless you can educate me about a time when it wasn't.)  Any modern-day war will hinge on economic developments and actions... NOT military "posturing."  And since the only monetary monopoly on the planet is The Bank... we will always know who started it, funded it, and will "win" in any case.   Public division will be a construct presented by the gatekeeper/narrative generators... they will employ activists and their "journalist" ilk to foist a narrative which we will be confidently told "everyone believes."

5. Early 2026: The Spark

The "spark" will be economic, regardless of the "appearances."  It is the only thing that "business" demonstrably cares about...  I suggest it will be about a "cyber attack" not an explosive conflagration... although such a "military" act is within the "narrative crafting" stage-work of the parties.  I reject the notion that "we'll go nuclear" as 'likely'... unless partisanship has degraded to the point of cult-idiocy.  I doubt we're there yet.

6. Mid-2026: Aftermath and Survival

Should there be multiple nuclear engagements, we're done.  There is no "coming back" as a civilization from using the 'kill everybody/suicide' button.

Feel completely free to ignore this post... I expect you should.
Reply




TERMS AND CONDITIONS · PRIVACY POLICY