DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

I support abortion because I don't think rapists should be allowed to be fathers
(12-09-2025, 09:05 AM)ANNEE Wrote: So you get a choice but those who want an abortion don’t?

just asking.


If you don't want a hangover, you don't get drunk.  If you don't want a baby you don't have unprotected sex.  It really isn't rocket science.

I was under the impression that the discussion was about women that had been raped being *forced* to have an abortion.  Hence my opinion that even if I was raped I wouldn't want an abortion.

I also mentioned that in the unfortunate event of rape, the woman should be immediately offered something to halt conception - therefore no abortion required as no pregnancy will occur.  Again, it's not rocket science.

You can't just go around flippantly killing off unborn babies because they inconvenience you.
(12-09-2025, 09:10 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: The murder-apologists will insist that doesn't matter. They are intractable. Their own testimony is they have no souls, but we know better and can at least have some compassion for the poor things, and use the law to keep their evil in check as much as possible.

So you expect others to adhere to your belief. 

A soul?  God?  Those are man made beliefs. 

I do not choose your belief. Never will. 

Compassion?  FEED THE LIVING CHILDREN.
(12-09-2025, 09:30 AM)ANNEE Wrote: Compassion?  FEED THE LIVING CHILDREN.

Your argument is nonsense. It is also illegal for parents to starve their children.
(12-09-2025, 09:02 AM)ANNEE Wrote: LIVING CHILDREN are homeless and hungry.

Living children are slaughtered in the womb ... shredded and burned to death with chemicals ... by their own mother.   Beating human hearts are stopped from beating ... by their own mother.
(12-09-2025, 09:02 AM)ANNEE Wrote: When ALL LIVING CHILDREN are cared for — fed — sheltered — have health care — education — etc. 

Then and only then will I consider the unwanted/unborn. 

You aren't capable of doing two things at once?
That's pretty mentally challenged.
(12-09-2025, 09:50 AM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Your argument is nonsense. It is also illegal for parents to starve their children.


Do you comprehend how ridiculous that sounds?

”Somewhere on paper it is written it is illegal to starve your child”.
(12-09-2025, 09:30 AM)ANNEE Wrote: So you expect others to adhere to your belief. 

A soul?  God?  Those are man made beliefs. 

I do not choose your belief. Never will. 

Compassion?  FEED THE LIVING CHILDREN.


You are entirely missing the point of this thread. None of that has anything to do with forcing pregnant rape victims to get abortions whether they want one or not.

That is forcing someone's beliefs on others.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
(12-09-2025, 12:35 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Do you comprehend how ridiculous that sounds?

”Somewhere on paper it is written it is illegal to starve your child”.


Let's indulge your argument a bit. 

There are more people alive than can be easily fed. Some are atarving. The reason for this is medicine. Medicine keeps people alive longer and more people alive. Should we get rid of medicine to more easily feed more people?

If you have ever in your life have been to the doctor or taken medication, you can't argue that. You have in fact artificially kept yourself alive. You are consuming food that would be consumed by someone else if nature took its course.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
(12-09-2025, 12:39 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: You are entirely missing the point of this thread. None of that has anything to do with forcing pregnant rape victims to get abortions whether they want one or not.

That is forcing someone's beliefs on others.


No I’m not. I addressed the OP earlier in thread. 

But the thread has drifted. 

I’ve actually had an abortion. I’m speaking from my real life experience. 

Belief and emotional response is not really a valid argument.
(12-09-2025, 12:47 PM)ANNEE Wrote: No I’m not. I addressed the OP earlier in thread. 

But the thread has drifted. 

I’ve actually had an abortion. I’m speaking from my real life experience. 

Belief and emotional response is not really a valid argument.


So your own beliefs are not valid to others? You are arguing that.

You made a personal choice in getting a medical procedure, I will not judge you for that. That is not my place.

You are trying to force the same decision on others and want the same outcome. That is wrong.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?