Did A United Monarchy of Israel Actually Exist? - Printable Version +- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com) +-- Forum: Science, Mystery, & Paranormal (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Science-Mystery-Paranormal) +--- Forum: Ancient & Lost Civilizations (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Ancient-Lost-Civilizations) +--- Thread: Did A United Monarchy of Israel Actually Exist? (/Thread-Did-A-United-Monarchy-of-Israel-Actually-Exist) |
Did A United Monarchy of Israel Actually Exist? - IdeomotorPrisoner - 11-20-2023 The Historicity of The Kingdom of Israel Quote:The study does not purport to prove that the United Monarchy of the Israelites described in the Bible was a historical reality. But it shows that the kingdom’s existence and involvement in major construction at Gezer cannot be ruled out, the authors say. That has always been the crux of the debate. Archaeological evidence is finding it harder to validate the biblical claims. Settlements have always been dated to the 9th and 8th Century BCE leading up to the Assyrian siege around 701 BCE. On the Temple Mount there is not much between the archaeological layers between The Canaanite Red Brick City, and the Assyrian layer. It's called the "slum layer". It was inhabited during the 900s, but evidence of a greater and advance Kingdom have always been lacking. Quote: Archaeotheology bugs me. Sometimes it seems they want really hard to validate the historicty of the dates. And this one has its doubters, but don't dismiss it as irrelevant after the carbon dating checks out.. Quote:Accordingly, Finkelstein and others have since assigned these structures to the Omride dynasty, which ruled over the northern Kingdom of Israel (as opposed to its smaller, southern neighbor, the Kingdom of Judah) in the first half of the ninth century B.C.E. Naturally, the new dating evidence is getting dismissed by the mainstream opinion. I often thought the Post-exilic writers of the Old Testament took some liberties, as the 2nd temple victors did a RETCON of history. Even Exodus was last edited in 3rd Century BCE. So, Biblical Historicity has a lot of propaganda to sift through. I felt they overhyped David and Solomon to make themselves more significant than those renegades that split off from The Canaanite and created their own varient myth, and then found life hard doing so... Interesting none the less. There's a poll option, going to try that out.. |