+- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Off-Topic)
+--- Forum: Pets (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Pets)
+--- Thread: Martyrdom of the Squirrel (/Thread-Martyrdom-of-the-Squirrel)
Martyrdom of the Squirrel - Anna - 11-05-2024
Once upon a time, there lived a squirrel called Peanut. Its mother was hit by a car and Peanut was left alone to die in the wild. But one good man felt sorry for the squirrel and took Peanut to his home. He fed the squirrel and let it become the star of the internet.
For seven years Peanut lived happily with its master, making him famous online. Its performance on Instagram amassed thousands of followers, which was far more than what bitter lonely ladies could hope for. The bitter lonely ladies felt jealous and complained to the authorities that Peanut probably had rabies and this was the reason why it was so cute.
The authorities confiscated the squirrel and put it to death to be tested for rabies. Its heartbroken owner now collects the funds for the legal battle to avenge the death of his beloved pet.
Peanut's death caused public outcry. Even Trump himself and his supporters condemned it, putting the blame on... democrats.
Instagram-famous squirrel euthanized after it was taken from owner's New York state home
Now seriously, while killing innocent animals makes me sad, I can't help feeling that the animal was used instrumentally by its owner to make money. And what are your thoughts about this story?
Do you think that the restrictions on keeping small wild animals at home as pets are too much of the government's intrusion into the citizens' lives?
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - Sirius - 11-05-2024
This would always have gotten a strong reaction and rightfully so.
On the larger topic, there is some real horror stores of people living with animals. Policing unfortunately is needed, but so is having a heart and common sense.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - FlyersFan - 11-05-2024
(11-05-2024, 04:07 AM)Anna Wrote: while killing innocent animals makes me sad, I can't help feeling that the animal was used instrumentally by its owner to make money.]\
Disagree.
The man is heartbroken. And ticked off.
I'd be trying to get $$ to hire lawyers to sue the officials as well.
This story disgusts me.
An example of big government with no common sense.
I hope this man grinds the people responsible into the dirt beneath his feet.
Growing up I had neighbors who had a pet squirrel.
Like PNut, this squirrel was rescued when young.
It was very attached to the family.
When they had the squirrel for a few years, they went on vacation.
They had the neighbor come in to feed the squirrel.
The squirrel died while the family was gone ...
We all believe it died of a broken heart, it didn't understand they were coming back.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - Anna - 11-05-2024
(11-05-2024, 06:01 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: This story disgusts me.
An example of big government with no common sense.
This story disgusts me as well. The animal shouldn't be killed. It's not the animal's fault that the owner didn't try to get a license.
But the thing is that if the squirrel wasn't shown around on Instagram, the heartless government officials probably wouldn't know about its existence.
In my country, there are restrictions on keeping wild animals too. In the past, in order to keep a lion or a tiger at home, it was enough to register a fictional circus. Now the procedures are much more strict. There's some bureaucracy to go through too if you want to keep small animals. If the permission isn't obtained, an animal can be confiscated. I didn't hear about the cases of euthanasia though.
However, the authorities must somehow learn that you keep a wild animal at home. While it would be difficult to hide a tiger or an elephant, a squirrel could be kept at home without anyone knowing. The question is whether it would be happy while locked at home. I don't think it needs internet popularity though.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - pianopraze - 11-05-2024
(11-05-2024, 04:07 AM)Anna Wrote: Once upon a time, there lived a squirrel called Peanut. Its mother was hit by a car and Peanut was left alone to die in the wild. But one good man felt sorry for the squirrel and took Peanut to his home. He fed the squirrel and let it become the star of the internet.
For seven years Peanut lived happily with its master, making him famous online. Its performance on Instagram amassed thousands of followers, which was far more than what bitter lonely ladies could hope for. The bitter lonely ladies felt jealous and complained to the authorities that Peanut probably had rabies and this was the reason why it was so cute.
The authorities confiscated the squirrel and put it to death to be tested for rabies. Its heartbroken owner now collects the funds for the legal battle to avenge the death of his beloved pet.
Peanut's death caused public outcry. Even Trump himself and his supporters condemned it, putting the blame on... democrats.
Instagram-famous squirrel euthanized after it was taken from owner's New York state home
Now seriously, while killing innocent animals makes me sad, I can't help feeling that the animal was used instrumentally by its owner to make money. And what are your thoughts about this story?
Do you think that the restrictions on keeping small wild animals at home as pets are too much of the government's intrusion into the citizens' lives?
Wait til they here about us Floridians and alligators…
Twitter video
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - Maxmars - 11-05-2024
As caustic and egregious as it sounds, this is the effect of unquestionable, entitled government thuggery... and 'Nazi collaborator-like' Karens signaling the virtue of 'public safety' by 'being afraid of a guy with non-standard pets.'
The opportunists get clicks and huzzahs from a voyeuristic public, and politicians are quick to enjoin the 'outrage machinery' for fun and profit.
Poor P'nut. Killed to prove its' innocence.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - UltraBudgie - 11-05-2024
Oh look there's a whole bureaucratic process surprise surprise:
Quote:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/11/02/peanut-squirrel-euthanized-legal/76009885007/
In New York, wildlife rehabilitators need a license to take in squirrels that need help. They can only be kept for a few months before they have to be reintroduced to the wild, Tindal said.
To keep a squirrel for longer, a rehabilitator has to apply for a permit through the federal government, and those officials send investigators to check out the living environment for the animal and ascertain that it is safe. Caretakers are required to get regular veterinary care for the animal, and a vet must write a letter explaining why the animal is nonreleasable. In New York, the rehabilitator then must apply for another special state license.
The whole process can take a long time, Tindal said. "It's quite a daunting process to go through all the paperwork, and then I can see where someone would be intimidated by that or even afraid because once you start the application process, they're aware that you have this animal."
"We were ready to comply. We were ready to complete the paperwork. We were in the process of doing that," Longo told CBS New York. "We needed a little bit of guidance from the DEC."
A license, a permit, an investigation, veterinary approval, then another license. So many opportunities to enjoy the love of the State.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - Chiefsmom - 11-05-2024
Well, first, I had read that he originally tried to get a wildlife rehab to take it, and they wouldn't/couldn't at the time.
Second, I don't give a damn if he made money off it. He obviously took good care of it and if people choose to send in money, that's on them, not him.
Sounds like he made a lot of money originally of the Fans only page anyway, to buy the land. He has other rescue animals he has taken in. (That incidentally, the A holes would not let him tend to while they were raiding his property for 5 damn hours)
There is absolutely NO reason the squirrel or the racoon should have been put down.
The government knew how long he had them, with no signs of rabies. Which apparently is either extremely rare or none existent in squirrels anyway.
They should have been put in quarantine.
I would be pissed. Sueing the hell out of them, camping outside their doors with signs, slamming them all over the internet.
Maybe they should put someone in charge of this agency, that actually knows about animals?
Because these clowns don't appear to know anything.
RE: Martyrdom of the Squirrel - IdeomotorPrisoner - 11-05-2024
Quote:Now seriously, while killing innocent animals makes me sad, I can't help feeling that the animal was used instrumentally by its owner to make money. And what are your thoughts about this story?
What about their "Only Fans" porn income? I think they did live sex stream things too. There's more money in horny people paying to see them than there is in an instagram Squirrel.
Someone with a "letter of the law" hair up their ass didn't like their internet income lifestyle and wanted to be a killjoy and thank them for buying land in New York.
Thou shall not conserve nature without going through the correct bureaucratic motions, including painstaking licensing process. You can hunt them (if you are 12 and have a permit), skin them, and make them into hillbilly casserole, but you can't keep one as a pet!
That Squirrel might swing Pennsylvania, which is a state known for its love of rodents.
Maybe NY democrats are like Phil Conners, and they just snapped seeing the endless winter and had to kidnap and kill the rodent to feel better?
