Alien ship headed for us? - Printable Version +- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com) +-- Forum: Main Forums (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Main-Forums) +--- Forum: Aliens & UFOs (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Aliens-UFOs) +--- Thread: Alien ship headed for us? (/Thread-Alien-ship-headed-for-us) Pages:
1
2
|
Alien ship headed for us? - Coop - 09-26-2024 I dont know why, but I have not seen anything on any news outlet about this, Ive only seen video on tiktok and youtube, some of them claiming its an "alien armada". But, its interesting and some say it will be here in 3 weeks and has to do with an event in 2027. I havent seen anything posted here or on ATS, and this seems like a perfect story for us. Anyone have any more info? I havent really done a deep dive into it. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/what-is-it-webb-telescope-detects-mysterious-object-that-is-course-correcting-congress-briefed/vi-AA1rbGsF https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8RmPmdR/ RE: Alien ship headed for us? - 85303 - 09-26-2024 Step one - plug in guitar/amp Step 2 - dig up old tool tabs Step 3 - viginti tres, 10,000 days, wings for Marie Step 4 - learn to swim Cause mamas coming round to put it back the way it oughta be RE: Alien ship headed for us? - Chiefsmom - 09-26-2024 I hadn't heard about this, or I don't remember hearing about it. But it sure would make what is going on with our government's sudden shift in the UFO, UAP "openness" make more sense. I wonder how close it would have to be, for countries to stop their wars, if at all? RE: Alien ship headed for us? - k0rn - 09-26-2024 My iPad won’t let me watch TikTok without the app for some reason MSN looks like an advertisement collage RE: Alien ship headed for us? - Maxmars - 09-26-2024 I found it very interesting to breakdown how this information was being sourced. And of course, it wasn't sourced exactly. The notional alert seems to point to far-off "large" object(s) which is said to be correcting it's course, and roughly headed towards "us." Someone (unstated) calculating an arrival time around 2027... There's a lot of gaps in the information... the JWT is being cited as the tool which allowed us to detect this 'object' (or objects) and everyone is very careful to point out that is is still essentially a rumor... no real attributions or specifics on details about from what direction, speed, and the actual nature of "course corrections" detected. Very interesting fodder for discussion... Good thread! RE: Alien ship headed for us? - VulcanWerks - 09-26-2024 Link to the former agency official’s comments: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/aliens-reveal-themselves-2027-claims-190158829.html Quote: After leaving the intelligence community, Ramirez has enjoyed a second career as a UFO aficionado, making the rounds of the podcast circuit to tell the world what he allegedly knows. In February 2023, he gave an interview on Podcast UFO, during which he warned of an oncoming alien revelation in 2027. And consistent with the above post of mine… Quote: THE UAP DISCLOSURE ACT: ‘MUST-PASS LEGISLATION’ https://thedebrief.org/uap-disclosure-act-receives-pushback-from-lawmakers-on-capitol-hill-as-bipartisan-fight-for-transparency-continues/ There might be some truth to the agency members comments, 2027, and why now. I thought Astr0 told us it was 2040 when they’d show up. Or maybe that’s when Astr0’s crew leaves. :) RE: Alien ship headed for us? - Maxmars - 09-26-2024 (09-26-2024, 08:08 PM)VulcanWerks Wrote: Link to the former agency official’s comments: I've never been one to accept the notion of "mass panic." Although I don't deny that mass panic can be engineered... "because 'appearances' are everything," I've been often told. This revelation may or may not be within anyone's control to manifest... why does it seem that it is, in fact, being 'managed?' I have never been skeptical of this topic... but I have great reservations about how information is being moved between those allegedly "in the know" and the rest of the world. One thing that strikes me is the fact that part of this story is about "players" in the subject-matter field... that's is almost never a good sign... RE: Alien ship headed for us? - 85303 - 09-26-2024 Which players because I watched the two links and only saw some cagey skeptical nerds that I don't recognise. Not that I would. They say nothing and suggest someone suggested alien ship with no confirmation but a bunch of cool chaos star type shapes on the lens or maybe superimposed/photoshopped over a large space zoomed in panning around not showing anything... I want to believe but it's reading like the rough draft of a pilot episode for a shitty Syfy show RE: Alien ship headed for us? - Maxmars - 09-26-2024 (09-26-2024, 08:48 PM)85303 Wrote: Which players because I watched the two links and only saw some cagey skeptical nerds that I don't recognise. Not that I would. I confess, I don't follow the personality lore in this subject. There's too much drama and attention given to it... But the continuous references to who said what, and how they didn't say from where, or who, is a hallmark of 'industry ignorance.' Whether that ignorance is about UFOs generally, is one thing, but when it's about "people" it's an entirely different matter. I wish I could help, but I can't "name names" because I care about the topic, not the celebrities. (I feel bad for the folks at Syfy... you nailed it! ) RE: Alien ship headed for us? - VulcanWerks - 09-26-2024 (09-26-2024, 08:20 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I've never been one to accept the notion of "mass panic." Although I don't deny that mass panic can be engineered... "because 'appearances' are everything," I've been often told. I’m unsure on the mass panic thing. Some would flip out but some data suggests at least 50% of people believe in UFOs if not more. Note I say “believe” as the actual number of people who have seen something strange is unknown - said differently, very few people report their sightings. I didn’t report mine. We live in a society that is more technologically advanced than most people alive 70 year ago could have even imagined. If you’re over 90, you live in a world of effectively magic. But, we’re used to tech. “Anti-gravity” doesn’t seem that far fetched - we’re reaching the next step on our evolution. But, I suppose a lot of “big stuff” hasn’t changed. Houses aren’t all that different, a 737 isn’t a lot different for a passenger than it was 40 years ago, flight times haven’t gone down materially, etc. Transportation is a laggard but I suppose it has to be given how many problems the ability to travel very long distances in very short periods of time would case - but that’s an aside. That’s all to say that I suspect the majority of the population wouldn’t be shocked by “aliens” they’d be concerned about the unknown and ponder if they pose a threat. It’s kind of the same emotion you’d have in any scenario where the outcome or situation is unknown and one of those outcomes may be a material threat of physical harm. That’s the “panic” they refer to. In all the societal conditioning, we got ET, MIB, Resident Alien, etc. as examples of “good” aliens. Star Trek showed us a future that involved many species and hybrid-species as an alliance bound by a belief system. I’m a life-long Trekkie, but, Star Wars and the “Alien” series won out. The masses are expecting that or “Independence Day” and that at least in part feeds the fear of the unknown or “panic” factor significantly. One thing that would make people “feel better” is if they believe we have very advanced weaponry that would give us a “chance” at beating them. Say, “anti-gravity” craft, fusion weapons, laser-based weapons, space-based weapons, space-based military aircraft and defense stations. If we had all of that and people knew it was there the fear factor would melt a whole bunch IMO. They’d believe we can defend ourselves, it’s less of a threat and the people may be on “red alert” but probably more with active defense in mind - not the fear of the unknown. An aside - Isn’t it kind of negligent of us as a species to have not created space-based defense systems? We have 8bn souls down here and nothing up there of consequence if publicly available information is accurate. Given how many worlds exist, how much we can see with JW, even if we haven’t engaged other life it would be pretty silly to say it’s impossible - and with our tech we can scale much better what the probabilities of life are in various places - shouldn’t we say “you know? Maybe we should stop fighting each other for a bit and realize if “they” show up and we’re not ready we’re all screwed - let’s focus on planetary defense so our species can thrive and survive and worry about earthly land grabs later”. As I type that out, it seems pretty reasonable just based on open-source information. Alas, we’d get some sort of “panic” but many would probably be fine. I’d be excited. Whether it’s a peaceful meeting of species or something that looks like a violent alien movie - I’m game. We would get to experience the single most important event in the history of our species and even if you didn’t make it, you got to see it. You got to see the thing that’s bigger than most all the things. And it wouldn’t matter how much money you have, what your job title is, what street you live on, what car you drive, what school you went to - none of that would be a qualifier to experiencing it. That’s worth the risk and I sincerely hope whoever makes contact is a lot more like Picard than not. (09-26-2024, 09:03 PM)Maxmars Wrote: I confess, I don't follow the personality lore in this subject. There's too much drama and attention given to it... I don’t do the personality cult either. If you approach this subject not as an entertainer only those who are truly researchers will “follow” or “know” you. Even then, they get turned into “the ufo guy” and then “believers” flock. It’s all a bunch of BS from the “personalities”. What seems to happen is they start out as serious researchers or connected people and then devolve into “buy my app”. I suspect it’s because there’s not many people with the coin to not monetize what they do. Regardless, I can be spared the personalities. |