Deny Ignorance
Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - Printable Version

+- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com)
+-- Forum: Main Forums (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Main-Forums)
+--- Forum: Education & Media (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Education-Media)
+--- Thread: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns (/Thread-Teacher-was-fired-for-refusing-to-call-children-by-their-preferred-pronouns)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - AnAlternateOpinion - 06-08-2024

(06-08-2024, 06:55 PM)Maxmars Wrote: But I think there is a mischaracterization in play in your last paragraph. The care which we should be discussing is medically necessary gender remediation... what's illegal in those states is performing it without the recommendation of a doctor. It seemed prudent to me since surgical gender-reassignment is a one way street, and is a sterilization process... not something a minor should be undergoing because "they just feel like it," (and they have thousands of dollars to burn.)

I think your information and understanding of the medicalization aspects and opportunities for trans youth are somewhat behind the times or at least not current with the latest developments.

Several states have banned gender affirming/transitional surgical procedures for those under 18 which are rarely performed anyway with genital surgery performed on minors being a practically non-existent thing except in special and very, very rare cases. Other forms of intervention such as puberty suppression and cross-sex hormones are still permitted.

Curiously if a flat-chested teenage natal female has breast augmentation or rhinoplasty to affirm her gender or enhance her sexual attractiveness, that’s okay which seems like a double standard to me.

Several states have banned all forms of “gender affirming care” for anyone under 18 and in some instances, even counseling if it supports the notion of a gender identity different from one’s sex assigned at birth.

In spite of best practice medical guidelines supported by every major medical organization in the U.S., many states prohibit the use of puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones for minors with some states even pondering banning all trans medical care for those under 26. (note: puberty blockers can’t inhibit puberty if it has already passed)

Some states have sought to make it a felony for a doctor to prescribe puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones under any circumstances to persons under 18 so “criminalization” is indeed at play.

Some states have prohibited medical care for trans youth that are already receiving it causing them to discontinue necessary therapies and treatments.

Have a look at this map: Bans on Best Practice Medical Care for Transgender Youth

One thing it seems you fail to recognize is that there are some trans and other LGBTx youth in desperate need of care who live in unwelcoming and unsupportive homes.

Quote: Research has shown that those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or questioning (LGBTQ+) have a 120% higher risk of experiencing some form of homelessness.[1] With up to 40% of the 4.2 million youth experiencing homelessness identifying as LGBTQ+[2] while only 9.5% of the U.S. population[3], LGBTQ+ youth disproportionately experience homelessness compared to their straight and cisgender peers. They are also more likely to experience assault, trauma, depression, and suicide when compared to non-LGBTQ+ populations while also being homeless. These statistics are even worse for Black and Indigenous People of Color (BIPOC) LGBTQ+ populations who suffer from racial inequities and discrimination.
source

There has roughly been 1000 anti-LGBTx pieces of legislation proposed in the last two years with many of them passing into law and most of them focusing on transgender kids but what you might find interesting is who is behind all this as practically none has come from grassroots constituents clamoring for laws but rather in almost all instances motivation to propose and pass these laws comes from a handful of powerful anti-everything that isn’t straight and cisgender extremist fundamentalist religions political organizations. To name drop a few on some sort of a Christo jihad, how about the Alliance Defending Freedom, the the Family Research Council, the Heritage Foundation and the Liberty Counsel. As a firm believer of separation of church and state, the influence of these organizations on policy and legislation is absolutely abhorrent that scares me to the bone.

Before this turns into a rant on my part, I’m taking a breather and watching movies and playing video games for the rest of the evening. Thank you Maxmars for allowing this discussion without, for the most part, it turning into a complete shitshow.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - BeTheGoddess - 06-09-2024

No politics on DI?.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - l0st - 06-09-2024

(06-07-2024, 06:18 AM)K218b Wrote: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13497389/wyoming-teacher-fired-trans-students-preferred-pronouns.html



The student called another teacher who tried to argue the parents of the students gave their permission to be called by another name. The student is a boy identifying as a girl.

Then as the teacher wasn't going to change his mind the Principal stepped in and said the teacher is not welcome back to the school after all he did. Then he was escorted out of the school by the Vice-Principal.

And that's the second time the teacher was fired for the same reason! A similar incident occurred during the spring semester at another school in the same district, Triumph High School. The Principal asked him to leave the premises because he wasn't obviously fit to teach.

I wonder if the education authorities should take the matter further. The teacher refused to call a boy who identified as a girl with another name and a girl who identified as a boy with another name. These teachers deserve not only to be fired but they shouldn't be anywhere near children, let alone be their teachers and mentors. Shame of him! He should be banned from the profession.

Good. Schools have no business coddling the mentally ill. Teacher did nothing wrong. If the parents want their child to be called by some other name, then they should petition the court for a name change.

I'd love to know what reasoning was used to tell this teacher to leave the premises? Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen. What policy was broken? Which law was violated? I have a hard time believing Wyoming, of all states, has a pro-transgender pronoun and name policy but maybe things have dropped off the deep end further than I thought.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - Byrd - 06-09-2024

(06-08-2024, 05:56 PM)Karl12 Wrote: I always thought you were a man Byrd - not that it matters.

Can you not grasp what Jordan is saying here about the inherent dangers of state sponsored absurdity?

Let people believe whatever they want - I think everyone agrees with that one (unless it physically harms children like MAPs).

The government has absolutely no business getting involved - and I've seen what happens when it does.

I think it's a pushback against politeness.

Politeness has gone from being "noble and worthy of emulation" and a standard for anyone in the society to being associated with "snowflake" and "tree hugger" and other derogatory terms.

When someone's intentionally rude to another person over a fairly trivial matter (a name), then the odds are pretty decent that they're doing it to be mean and to force a confrontation.  That's not an appropriate way to treat a child.

The child didn't ask to be bullied by an adult.  The child only asked for a preferred method of address.

Teachers are supposed to be empathic towards students -- a teacher who understands where the student is coming from can be a better manager of classroom problems.  Our modern school system approach (as flawed as it is) is a HUGE step up from the old system, where education was NOT a right and if you wanted an education, you danced to the demands of whoever the teacher was.  If the teacher wanted to beat you with a bookstrap, that was just fine.

So firing this guy is appropriate.  Kids don't need to be bullied by adults.



Oh... yes, I'm a woman.  Never made a secret of it.  HOWEVER... what you're noticing is that my text 'genders' as male (run my stuff through any "textual gender analysis program and you'll see that I come out as "male" or "mostly male.")


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - l0st - 06-09-2024

(06-08-2024, 01:19 AM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: As much as some would like teachers to teach the curriculum and stick to the three “Rs” as it were, there is a lot more going on in K-12 schools than just the lessons and only someone with a limited black and white understanding of the world would fail to see that.

There is no more crucial time in our lives learning about socialization, the development of our personalities and for gaining our own sense of agency and identity to carry us into our adult lives. How we learn to interact with others and the world and establish our place within it is an inherent part of our school years so to discount these factors as being irrelevant as a part of the educational process would be shortsighted if not foolhardy.

In my opinion if the kids are gender variant or transgender and are known by others and their family a certain way, that this should be respected when politely asked without being a dick about it or trying to make a point. I know from my dealings with trans youth, decades of researching into the subject and from personal experiences that when a teacher acknowledges a student’s identity without trying to make it a political or ideological battleground, it can go a long way toward facilitating the actual learning process and curriculum.

PS
I like the little rainbow reputation thing in the profile of mods and admins. Is this for pride month? LOL

I would think they should actually be learning that they're really a boy or a girl and that they need to accept the factual and actual state of the body they live in. They may "feel" that they are some other gender but they are, in fact, NOT.

I think its extremely unhealthy for a kid to be taught that the source of all their problems in life is that they're not really a boy, but a girl, and they need to chop their dick off to "fix it." Trust me, chopping off your genitals fixes NOTHING.

I really have to question the whole agenda on this issue because it seems to me that what we actually have are mostly, young men who don't feel they're able to compete or make it against their male peers, so they get to surgically/medically cheat by giving themselves the appearance of the opposite gender (or more often, their perception of the appearance of the opposite gender because I have NEVER seen a "drag queen" who dresses in any fashion that a reasonable person would consider normal and I think the same can be said for (the very few) FTMs who seem to think being a "man" is getting covered in tattoos and piercings and dressing like a hipster).

To be brutally honest here, my assessment of the situation with these people from my basic observations is that for whatever reason, they feel that they are unable to function in society as the person that they are. They seem to believe that changing their gender and identity will somehow magically make all of their problems go away. "If only I were a woman, everything would be easier." Its just such a drastic over-simplification of reality and the fact remains that even if they do transition, the mental issues that have them feeling this way in the first place are still there - ergo why more than 50% post-transition end up killing themselves when they realize that "becoming a woman" isn't the magic bullet for life success they thought it was.

If you want confirmation of this, go read the manifesto from the tranny in PA who shot up the school. This person was literally OBSESSED with having a penis. Why? I dunno. Believe you me, possession of a penis isn't going to magically fix all your problems. The behavior is bizarre. The rest of us should not be required to pander to the delusions of a mentally ill transgender any more than we would pander to the delusions of Jeffrey Dalmer.

If I went to the doc or my school counselor and said I wanted my arm removed because I felt that my body shouldn't have an arm and I don't want one, I'd be immediately stuffed in a straight jacket and shipped off to the psych ward. But hey, go chop your dick off hey that's totally fine no problem here! And lets be real here, well over 90% of the "trans" movement are men who want to be women and not the other way around.

(06-08-2024, 04:05 AM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: I didn’t find your comments particularly or overly abrasive but I appreciate your willingness to try to improve. Along those lines I might suggest using phrases like “a student's whining about their sexualized identity-fantasy” and “wallow in their sexuality obsessed perceptions” falls somewhat short of the mark of being less abrasive and demonstrates a general but common misunderstanding of gender atypical and transgender youth due to lack of actual or practical experience in dealing with these scenarios or individuals beyond what is presented in the media.


Having reviewed the linked article in the OP, this is indeed a case with this teacher. Would it really have been so hard or earth shattering to simply respect these student’s request and get on with the lessons without turning the whole thing into a political battleground?

To address the suggestion that if a student wants to be called a different name, it should be changed legally and reregistered as such with the school I would like to offer the following:

As today’s youth are more flexible and less rigid in matters of gender and sexuality, the possibility exists a young person might just be experimenting or trying on different identities to figure out what fits them and the timing for a legal name change might not be appropriate or even desired as they might not be ready for a full social transition. There are also costs involved that some families simply can’t afford as the rules and procedures for changing names (and gender) vary from state-to-state.

Even in cases where a child has gone through legal recognition of a gender change there are still those who refuse to use proper names and pronouns which can be pretty emotionally and psychologically devastating to the person involved but who cares about the kid when (conservative) ideology and the right to be an ass (free speech) matters more. To me that’s pretty heartless and certainly not conducive to a student excelling in their studies.

From the outside I’m sure these matters seem pretty cut and dried and black or white but these attitudes lack nuance and ignore the differences between individuals within a widely diverse group.


Championing what social behavior? Refusing to use a trans kid’s name and pronouns? That’s just asshattery and if your point was the inverse – that some teachers are promoting this “nonsense”, I would like to point out that they have every major medical association in the country backing their position.

Every major medical association backed the clot shots. Were they right? Have you noticed the hundreds of sportsball players dropping dead on the court/field? Totally normal, right?

Where were all these gender-confused kids when I was in school? Admittedly, I did know one or two, but not the thousands and thousands we have now. Just like all the other social-science movements through the 60s to present (think hippies, etc) the younger gens jump on the bandwagon for social credit points but in reality, most of them don't believe a lick of it, they just want to get laid. Once they get out into the real world they usually grow up and realize that the world is not what Facebook, Instagram, CNN, and MSNBC said it was.

The teacher has no obligation to honor anything but the child's legal name and this has always been the case. I remember back in middle school there was a classmate who's parents named him J. Michael something-or-other-lastname on his birth certificate even though everyone called him Mike, he still had to put his legal name down for standardized tests and whatnot.

I don't see that the teacher raised any political issue at all. The teacher called the student by the name printed on the roll and the student decided to make a political issue out of it by insisting that they be called by a name that is not legally theirs, then involving other teachers and administration to drive home the point. All the student had to do was acknowledge their real, legal name when called for attendance and that part of the class would have been over and they would have been on to the lesson, but instead the kid had to make a big stink about not being called by their legal name. This teacher was a substitute, so how would he/she even know about the student's political leanings?

See, I've noticed a trend where this current style of authoritarian liberalism is chock full of parties who seem to think that they have the right to control what and how other people speak. However, they have no such actual authority, and its not codified in any law in the entire US with the only exception being maybe, California. You cannot control other peoples' actions and words. You can only control how you react to them. But it seems very obvious to me that the parties backing this movement would like nothing more than to become language tyrants with sole authority to dictate how others think and speak - you can't even make this up because they're literally talking about sending half the country to "re-education camps" to force them to toe the transgender line.

(06-08-2024, 03:22 PM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: Trans youth is a subject I am passionate and very well informed about and I apologize if I become offensive but my previous online experiences in trying to bring some information and a different perspective to the discourse as well as the spate of ignorant politicized anti-trans legislation sweeping the country pushed by theocratic fascists wannabes (whew! LOL) has me mostly on the defensive. It shouldn’t have to be this way and I understand what a hot button topic trans youth has become and how contentions these discussions can be so I do make an effort to not be an ass but I am not always as successful in that as I would like to be.

...

I think you’re overcomplicating the situation and attributing “purpose and decorum” as being part of normal teenage behaviors and skill sets. In a 20 second exchange – teacher calls a kid Paul whose friends and family know them as Paula and a simple common request for decency and respect is met with obstinate politically motivated denial and refusal to accommodate the student’s appeal. The question becomes who is doing the platforming here, the student or the teacher? If someone insists on calling you Matilda or Maxine instead of Max wouldn’t you be inclined to correct them and when that fails to garner the proper response, to appeal to a higher authority? I don’t blame this kid at all and as this substitute teacher has a history of treating kids in ways they might find rude and offensive, repercussions seem appropriate.


With the fear of presenting a partisan response, my gut reaction is to call out that this is happening as you describe as a right-wing wet dream of misinformation but that wouldn’t be very nice of me. This notion that kids are being pushed into transition or a diagnosis of gender dysphoria is not borne out by the facts. Sure, conservative media capitalizes on this in the rare cases this does happen because it fans the flames of controversy and clicks but by far, this is the exception rather than the rule. The vast majority of kids seeking gender affirming care, which may be little more than a place to explore their thoughts and feelings, are unable to obtain it and in 25 U.S. states, such care has now been criminalized which should be a private matter between families and medical professionals.

I disagree that the "anti-trans" legislation is either ignorant or politicized. All the legislation does in the states that have it is require parental permission and/or wait until they've reached the age of majority to pursue clinical treatment. I think this is sound reasoning. We don't let kids drink until they're 21, or drive until the 16, but they should be able to order a dick chop at 5? Not buying it. And I think its absolutely reasonable for the law to expect these children to reach some level of maturity before making life altering decisions like permanently mutilating or removing one's genitalia.

I don't know of any kids who "seek gender affirming care." I know adults who deal with problematic students or offspring who are being offered a "solution" by the medical community that involves essentially turning their child into a eunuch and placing them on a lifetime of antipsychotic meds and hormones. Instead of directly addressing the cause they sidestep it by giving them a "new identity" and medicating them into oblivion. In my opinion, transgenderism is nothing more than they latest big-pharma tactic to sell treatments that subdue people's children much like Ritalin and Prozac were used by lazy parents and teachers to control children back in the 90s.

I'd love to know what it is you consider to be a "right wing wet dream of misinformation"? We've made it 10s of thousands of years on this earth without transgenderism and broad acceptance that there are 2 genetically possible genders but starting in 2010 we are all supposed to believe that there are now 96 genders and anyone can be any gender they want to be and they can even change their gender on a whim anytime they like. I'm sorry, but this thinking simply has no basis in reality.

(06-08-2024, 08:24 PM)AnAlternateOpinion Wrote: Curiously if a flat-chested teenage natal female has breast augmentation or rhinoplasty to affirm her gender or enhance her sexual attractiveness, that’s okay which seems like a double standard to me.

...

In spite of best practice medical guidelines supported by every major medical organization in the U.S., many states prohibit the use of puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones for minors with some states even pondering banning all trans medical care for those under 26. (note: puberty blockers can’t inhibit puberty if it has already passed)

...

There has roughly been 1000 anti-LGBTx pieces of legislation proposed in the last two years with many of them passing into law and most of them focusing on transgender kids but what you might find interesting is who is behind all this as practically none has come from grassroots constituents clamoring for laws but rather in almost all instances motivation to propose and pass these laws comes from a handful of powerful anti-everything that isn’t straight and cisgender extremist fundamentalist religions political organizations. To name drop a few on some sort of a Christo jihad, how about the Alliance Defending Freedom, the the Family Research Council, the Heritage Foundation and the Liberty Counsel. As a firm believer of separation of church and state, the influence of these organizations on policy and legislation is absolutely abhorrent that scares me to the bone.

Since you've specifically mentioned breast augmentation and rhinoplasty, it appears that your position is that gender-affirming surgeries are cosmetic surgeries and not medically necessary. Do you agree?

I find it interesting that you make lots of statements with very broad generalizations like "best practice medical guidelines supported by every major medical organization in the U.S." while this is FAR from the truth. There is absolutely no consensus in the medical community or otherwise that these treatments actually help children, particularly considering that more than half of post-op trans end up committing suicide. Once might argue that these treatments carry significant risk of killing half their patients. 

I've never personally heard of any of the "Christo jihad" organizations you mentioned. I find it hard to believe they would have the money or resources to single-handedly lobby state legislatures for these laws. I don't see these laws having anything at all to do with Christianity. They have to do with protecting the minds and bodies of children who are not yet fully developed, probably don't actually know what they really want yet, and who typically go through periods of confusion and discovery on their way to adulthood that might lead them through periods of poor or misinformed decision making that has the potential for permanent life-altering consequences.

Now that said, are there Christian orgs that are against this? Absolutely. Do they preach loudly about their beliefs? Sure do. Have they been doing that since time immortal? You bet.

Even back in the 80's the fundie groups were going after rock bands claiming satanic lyrics and things like that, secret messages encoded with backward masking, etc which was all always mostly a bunch of balogna. Yet they had pretty much zero traction getting any legislation passed on these issues.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - l0st - 06-09-2024

(06-09-2024, 05:38 PM)Byrd Wrote: When someone's intentionally rude to another person over a fairly trivial matter (a name), then the odds are pretty decent that they're doing it to be mean and to force a confrontation.  That's not an appropriate way to treat a child.

The child didn't ask to be bullied by an adult.  The child only asked for a preferred method of address.

Teachers are supposed to be empathic towards students -- a teacher who understands where the student is coming from can be a better manager of classroom problems.  Our modern school system approach (as flawed as it is) is a HUGE step up from the old system, where education was NOT a right and if you wanted an education, you danced to the demands of whoever the teacher was.  If the teacher wanted to beat you with a bookstrap, that was just fine.

Calling a child by their actual, legal name is NOT bullying or anything of the sort. There is an appropriate mechanism for the child to change their legal name, and they and their parents should have pursued this instead of politically grandstanding some high school class with a substitute teacher. Frankly, its behavior like this that is the exact reason this movement isn't getting the results they want.

Since when do we care what children want? This is right up there with Greta Thunberg in my book. Wailing incessantly about climate change - when did we start letting children dictate to grown adults how to run an operate a classroom or the world environment? Social culture does not give deference to children and for very good reason - they are not mentally equipped with the skills to handle being an adult. They should not be making any decisions that would normally require the authorization of an adult.

Since when are "teachers supposed to be empathic towards children'? Says who? I had plenty of teachers growing up who were complete assholes. It takes all kinds. The teachers aren't there to perform psychiatric counseling they're there to teach kids basic life skills they will need to succeed in the working world.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - ANNEE - 06-09-2024

I do not do long posts.  But school today is way different.  If you're an outsider making judgment -- you have no clue.

Socializing and all aspects of who a person is including gender variants takes priority over everything else.

I know because I am personally going through this experience right now.

Of course, there is still academics -- but it's pretty much automatic.  Assignments are online.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - l0st - 06-09-2024

(06-09-2024, 07:22 PM)ANNEE Wrote: I do not do long posts.  But school today is way different.  If you're an outsider making judgment -- you have no clue.

Socializing and all aspects of who a person is including gender variants takes priority over everything else.

I know because I am personally going through this experience right now.

Of course, there is still academics -- but it's pretty much automatic.  Assignments are online.

Why is transgenderism supplanting all other forms of education in our school systems? Children are not sent to school to discuss human sexuality. They're not sent to school to protest they are sent there to learn. They're sent to school to learn basic life skills like reading, writing, math, science, computers, etc. Aside from covering this phenomenon in a unit in health class and possible biology, I fail to see why such education should take such a prominent role in our children's educational careers.

I find it interesting that school systems spent decades teaching kids to ignore race, gender, etc only to do a complete 180 circa Obama admin and now one's race or sexual orientation seems to be the absolute first consideration one should be making when dealing with others. Literally, the kids are being taught "treat this person differently because they are black" and "treat this person differently because they are a lesbian". Anyone else see a problem here?

They're purposely polarizing and politicizing childrens' educations. Disgusting.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - ANNEE - 06-09-2024

"Why is transgenderism supplanting all other forms of education in our school systems?" 

I did not say that.

I said this:  "Socializing and ALL ASPECTS OF WHO A PERSON IS -- including gender variants takes priority over everything else.

Kids today are overloaded with information.  They need help in sorting it out.  They definitely don't need judgment from a self-righteous authoritarian.

For strictly academics there really is no reason not to do it at home.  It's all automated.  If you need to talk to an instructor there are many ways to do that, text, zoom, etc.


RE: Teacher was fired for refusing to call children by their preferred pronouns - l0st - 06-09-2024

(06-09-2024, 08:00 PM)ANNEE Wrote: "Why is transgenderism supplanting all other forms of education in our school systems?" 

I did not say that.

I said this:  "Socializing and ALL ASPECTS OF WHO A PERSON IS -- including gender variants takes priority over everything else.

Kids today are overloaded with information.  They need help in sorting it out.  They definitely don't need judgment from a self-righteous authoritarian.

For strictly academics there really is no reason not to do it at home.  It's all automated.  If you need to talk to an instructor there are many ways to do that, text, zoom, etc.

It certainly feels as though transgenderism is being placed on a pedestal above all of those other aspects. Take a look at the history of Black racism in the United States and you'll find that the civil rights movements of the 1960s developed over the course of decades, which eventually culminated in marches, sit-ins, protests, etc.

What strikes me as being odd about the transgenderism movement is that it feels 110% completely inorganic. Nobody ever thought about or cared about trans issues until roughly 2010 when all of a sudden Tranny bathrooms are the #1 topic in the news cycle as the first demand from this group, followed shortly after by more and more demands -- pronouns, medical access for children,  etc.

The strange thing is, there was/is no law preventing transgenderism. Any full grown adult has always had the option of getting as many plastic surgeries and hormone injections as they want with the support of a qualified doctor. Crossdressers have been around forever yet never seemed to have any issue figuring out which bathroom to use, nor did they demand their own special bathroom just for themselves. There have been numerous demands for "trans rights" yet when approached, not a single member of this group seems to be able to articulate the rights they are actually missing.

Re-framing the statement as "Socializing and ALL ASPECTS OF WHO A PERSON IS" really doesn't change anything. Why are social "sciences" being given priority in public schools over hard sciences that are actually part of the curriculum? My observation has been throughout this whole thing that transgenderism is not being added to the school curriculum, transgenderism is being pushed by a limited subset of liberal, activist teachers, psychologists, and medical professionals as a solution to "gender dysphoria," an affliction for which the medical community can't even agree what the criteria are for diagnosis.

Public schools have always been commissioned for teaching hard skills. If one wants to study sociology, psychology, or work in theoretical sciences the appropriate venue for such education and study is college and always has been. Public schools do not teach theory and conjecture.