Trump shot? - Printable Version +- Deny Ignorance (https://denyignorance.com) +-- Forum: Deny Politics (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Deny-Politics) +--- Forum: Decision 2024 (https://denyignorance.com/Section-Decision-2024) +---- Thread: Trump shot? (/Thread-Trump-shot) |
RE: Trump shot? - Lysergic - 07-17-2024 what this? RE: Trump shot? - Waterglass - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:08 PM)Lysergic Wrote: rifle was too hebby Read what his classmates said about his HS rifle team rejection. Was he groomed? Or, is he taking anger out against his parents or the High School by popping Trump? TBD RE: Trump shot? - FlyingClayDisk - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:03 PM)KKLoco Wrote: So now we’ve got a Hyundai, a conversion van, a GM pickup. Agreed. No way did this kid walk a mile with a 12' foot ladder. A run of the mill 12' foot fiberglass ladder (like the one pictured earlier by KKLoco) weighs approximately 50-60 lbs. They are also very unwieldy to carry single handedly. The probability of a kid with his physical build being able to carry just the ladder alone is unlikely. But the probability of carrying a 12' foot ladder, a rifle and ammunition...ain't gonna' happen! Note - The collapsible ladder like what Lysergic posted only weighs 25 lbs, but that's not the ladder shown in your picture. RE: Trump shot? - ArMaP - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:27 PM)Lysergic Wrote: what this? Appears to be one of these. https://www.alphastar.gr/fireworks/firing-systems/remote-control-001.310.013/ RE: Trump shot? - Lysergic - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:38 PM)ArMaP Wrote: Appears to be one of these. Guess it was the 'car bomb' ? RE: Trump shot? - FlyingClayDisk - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:27 PM)Lysergic Wrote: what this? It is a long range wireless switchable controller. Has a 5000 meter range. Transmits in the 433MHz area of the UHF spectrum which is an unlicensed area of the RF spectrum, and is Frequency Shift Key (FSK) (encoding) capable device. FSK is a basic encryption protocol. Here is the device posted. RE: Trump shot? - Lysergic - 07-17-2024 Would a random 20-year-old does arrive at the location hours in advance to scout the event, find the perfect vantage point on a nearby roof that avoids Trump's security, rig his car with explosives to create a distraction for escape, have no online search history on bomb-making, leave no manifestos or digital footprint related to the shooting, and have an alibi ready for being at a shooting range before the event. Is the level of planning involved is too sophisticated for an autistic, isolated individual? RE: Trump shot? - FlyingClayDisk - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:49 PM)Lysergic Wrote: Would a random 20-year-old does arrive at the location hours in advance to scout the event, find the perfect vantage point on a nearby roof that avoids Trump's security, rig his car with explosives to create a distraction for escape, have no online search history on bomb-making, leave no manifestos or digital footprint related to the shooting, and have an alibi ready for being at a shooting range before the event. Is the level of planning involved is too sophisticated for an autistic, isolated individual? This seems like a more than reasonable question. Unfortunately, I'm not sure I am qualified to answer it. Sorry. RE: Trump shot? - Maxmars - 07-17-2024 The latest observations and deductions are troubling. I'm still at a loss as to how exactly we can justify that we "shouldn't" be 'arm-chair quarterbacking' in light of what is being shared? The public (of whom we are all part) decides for themselves what to focus on (although the 'public' media does whatever it can to manipulate that focus.) The "narrative crafters" designated as "official" are granted some latitude in a timely explanation for good reason. But it is not THEY who "define" what happened, only to 'describe what they record.' We should have learned that decades ago as we strained against the JFK-assassination conspiracy. How long are we to 'pretend' that the official (read media) narrative is 'absolute' and 'sufficient?' Perhaps it is a lost cause, but I don't think the public dialogue should be squelched or sidelined over the loss of hope for answers from authority. Answers always come along... eventually. I have now heard the shooter called a "patsy," a "troubled" young man, a groomed operative, a paid killer, a militant malcontent, a lost ideologue, even a 'trained' psyop-operative... clearly the font of 'maybe' is flowing full open. Some may be easy to reject, other simply strain credulity, but regardless I maintain that whatever the facts are, in this context of "political extremism," the public should know them. It is part of the face of the present political world... In my opinion, we would be foolish to ignore it. RE: Trump shot? - ArMaP - 07-17-2024 (07-17-2024, 02:49 PM)Lysergic Wrote: Is the level of planning involved is too sophisticated for an autistic, isolated individual? I don't know where did you get the autistic from, but the answer is "no". At least in Portugal. |