Quote:1. Nearly 100,000 photos obtained by a House committee from the estate of notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein include images of President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, film director Woody Allen, former Trump White House advisor Steve Bannon and others in social settings.

 
2. Trump was a longtime friend of Epstein before the two men had a falling out sometime in the early 2000s.

3 . "These disturbing photos raise even more questions about Epstein and his relationships with some of the most powerful men in the world. We will not rest until the American people get the truth," said Rep. Robert Garcia, ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

This was in my news feed a few minutes ago...

It appears the unpopular opinion that all parties are involved is true!




MOD EDIT
Moved to EpsteinRevelatiosn forum

(12-12-2025, 11:18 AM)SleipnirTheHorse Wrote: This was in my news feed a few minutes ago...

It appears the unpopular opinion that all parties are involved is true!

Do you have some links to go with this?

Quote:A spokeswoman for Republicans on the committee said that it had received more than 95,000 images and that “Democrats are cherry-picking photos and making targeted redactions to create a false narrative about President Trump.”

Same old nothing burger of already know affiliations.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/democrats-r...n-7fe21bd2

A famous person having their picture taken with another famous person doesn't mean much.  It just means they bumped into each other or are acquainted.   It doesn't imply guilt.   It happens all the time at these rich/famous parties or events.

Any of him and Wexler?

By the logic of a few here, I would presume that Clinton is free of guilt since yah know, people take pictures so no big deal.

(12-12-2025, 11:51 AM)Rubyred356 Wrote: By the logic of a few here, I would presume that Clinton is free of guilt since yah know, people take pictures so no big deal.

Nope. Some here just like...you know...evidence

Something more than OMB, we've got him this time

Shit gets old

(12-12-2025, 11:51 AM)Rubyred356 Wrote: By the logic of a few here, I would presume that Clinton is free of guilt since yah know, people take pictures so no big deal.

That's not what I said.

I said that a picture of two famous people together doesn't mean someone is guilty. 
They take pictures like that all the time.    
EVIDENCE is what means someone is guilty.
Pictures like the ones released are not evidence of anything.

I have no doubt that Clinton is guilty.
But so far, the evidence has not been uncovered that can prove it.
So, by law, he remains 'innocent'.
(Even though we know he's not)

(12-12-2025, 11:51 AM)Rubyred356 Wrote: By the logic of a few here, I would presume that Clinton is free of guilt since yah know, people take pictures so no big deal.

Until proven guilty, yes. Anyone can be tried and found guilty in the court of public opinion, but thankfully that's not how it works.

If you get a picture with Jordan, it doesn't make you a member of the team.

Churchill roosevelt stalin hi-res stock photography and images - Alamy

Looks like Churchill and Roosevelt were communists.