What Happened to Our Kids?

[Good Bacteria]

Oh I dunno. 

I think we spend half our lives (at least) escaping the indoctrination forced on us from birth via parents. That is not saying all parents are bad — but their beliefs are indoctrination. Especially parents who stay stuck on the generation they were raised in can do a lot of harm. 

Several in here complain schools don’t teach history. I find that laughable because the “history” taught is so white washed it’s a joke. 

Kids should be free to think and reason. Not memorize - take a test. 

To be clear that I’ve experienced schools/education — I am 80 years old. Went to school in the 50’s/60’s. Raised my kids in the 70’s/80’s. Helped raise 2 grandkids in the 90’s/00 — and am currently raising grandson who graduates HS in 6 days. 

The one thing I would implement is discipline and respect — for those kids who choose and want to learn. Disruption of their learning is not OK. I know there are charter schools — but I would have schools set up on military/law enforcement facilities. Some kids are out of control. They need to be removed from kids who are not. 

Military regimentation has helped some kids who never had security in their lives. Not all — of course.

I find your perspective incredibly valuable, especially having witnessed the education system across four generations. Thank you. You are also highlighting an important paradox: how do we balance protecting a child's mind from state control while ensuring they aren't just trapped in a bubble?

However, the argument that schools must step in to "save" children from parental indoctrination is exactly the justification used to build this entire system.

Here is why:

The Monopoly of the State: When you say parents "indoctrinate" their kids with their generational beliefs, you are right—parents pass down their values. But a parent's influence is localized to their own family. If a parent is wrong, only their children are affected. When the state decides to step in and overwrite parental values, it applies a singular, mandatory ideology to millions of children at once. That isn't freeing kids to think; it is standardizing their thinking under a government monopoly.
   
The "Free to Think" Illusion: You stated that kids should be free to think and reason, not just memorize and take a test. I completely agree! But the modern curriculum doesn't teach critical thinking. It has traded old rote memorization for ideological compliance. True critical reasoning requires looking at multiple sides of an argument. If a school bans parents from opting their kids out of a specific viewpoint, the school is explicitly saying: "You are not free to think; you must accept this single perspective." 

The Discipline and Order Crisis: Your point about bringing back military-style discipline and regimentation for out-of-control environments is correct. But why did we lose that discipline? It is because the very pedagogical theories we are exposing in this thread explicitly argued that rules, traditional discipline, and school authority are "oppressive tools of control."

By removing traditional behavioral boundaries in the name of progressive equity, the system created the chaotic, disruptive environments you are rightfully calling out.

If we want kids to truly be free to think and reason, the answer isn’t to replace parental guidance with state-sponsored ideology. The answer is to return schools to viewpoint-neutral centers of hard academic discipline—math, reading, and objective logic—and let families handle the moral and social upbringing of their own children.

[Good Bacteria]

Honestly, I put a lot of blame for the chaos into education being the one area that a new government can quickly and visibly make changes to to demonstrate that they're “not the old government”. You can’t reform defence or policing or health quickly or in any real meaningful way, but education? Throw a new policy out, write a new curriculum or put a new name on the new focus and VOILA it looks like you’ve made an impact in your first year of your first term as the ruling party. 
but what happens on the frontline is no old policy is replaced unless explicitly said to be stopped, no one consults with teachers and so we end up with 8 hours of teaching mandated by law and by formal “moderation” to be taught in a 5 hour day and no one wants to fund either the schools or the teachers to the levels they need to be to function effectively (there is that famous “if a babysitter gets $5 an hour per child, then in my class of 30 I should be worth $150 an hour” argument).

You are exposing a massive component of why the administrative state functions the way it does. Excellent addition, thank you!

What you are describing is the bureaucratic incentive structure, and you are 100% correct about how political actors utilize it.

Education is treated as the ultimate political sandbox because it offers immediate, superficial optics of "doing something" without requiring the long-term structural heavy lifting of reforming defense or healthcare.

Your insight about how this plays out on the front lines perfectly explains why the system became so profoundly dysfunctional:

The Layering Effect: Because politicians want a quick press release, they announce a shiny new curriculum or a rebranded initiative every few years. But as you rightfully pointed out, the old mandates are rarely formally rescinded. Teachers are left trapped in a localized bureaucracy, trying to squeeze 8 hours of legally mandated compliance, data-tracking, and ideological moderation into a 5-hour instructional day.
   
The Unfunded Mandate Trap: This is the exact mechanism through which radical theories took over. When a government mandates a new standard but refuses to fund classroom resources or competitive teacher salaries, they create a resource vacuum.

The Vacuum Fillers: Who steps in to fill that vacuum? Ideological non-profits, massive educational publishing monopolies, and heavily funded activist networks. They offer free, pre-packaged lesson plans, teacher training seminars, and "social-emotional" toolkits. Overburdened, underfunded teachers are forced to grab whatever turnkey materials are handed to them just to survive the compliance audits.

The Babysitter Math: Your "$150 an hour" babysitter example exposes the profound disrespect built into the system. The state demands that teachers act as surrogate parents, social workers, data analysts, and behavioral psychologists, all while treating them like low-wage clerical workers.

By treating the classroom as a cheap public relations platform rather than a center for rigorous, basic academic instruction, the political class broke the back of the teaching profession.

They created an exhausting compliance machine that burns out excellent, traditional educators and leaves the door wide open for activist-driven administrative capture.

[ANNEE]

I don't get it ANNEE. Does this military regimentation offer them mental health and/or life navigation counselling? Does it offer security in the way that they need it, such as not being intimidated, bullied and/or judged by their superiors nor their peers? What does it offer? We both know how kids run amok and how they turn to other ways and means to cope. Why are you suggesting this

Warning, I'm drinking some wine.

Enjoy your wine ? 

The simple response is (cuz I like to simplify) — I was raised without discipline/rules. No child should be put in this position.   There’s no feeling of security. 

And the reverse. Too much discipline/rules that you live in fear — and may take it out on others in a negative way. 

So basically being in an environment with a set of rules that all need to adhere to. It creates a safe security. 

There have been many soldiers that say the military saved their life. 

Of course anything can be done right or wrong. 

Mostly I’m focused on kids who want to learn — not being disrupted.

[quintessentone]

Enjoy your wine ? 

The simple response is (cuz I like to simplify) — I was raised without discipline/rules. No child should be put in this position.   There’s no feeling of security. 

And the reverse. Too much discipline/rules that you live in fear — and may take it out on others in a negative way. 

So basically being in an environment with a set of rules that all need to adhere to. It creates a safe security. 

There have been many soldiers that say the military saved their life. 

Of course anything can be done right or wrong. 

Mostly I’m focused on kids who want to learn — not being disrupted.

I get it...I am not living your reality. The expensive wine it way too good.

[Toad of Toad Hall]

Kids are in school for 6 hours of the day in school, that leaves 18 hours left with them having to deal with what?

Reading, gaming, shenanigans, eating, sleeping, sport training…

[Karl12]

You are spotting the exact mechanism of this crisis. It feels like "enemy action" because the foundational architecture was openly designed to dismantle traditional Western systems from the inside out.

To answer your question about who came up with this: it was a deliberate handoff from European Marxist theorists to American education bureaucrats.

Here is the exact lineage of who engineered this shift:

•The Blueprint (The Frankfurt School): In the 1930s, European theorists like Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno realized that a traditional economic Marxist revolution would never work in America because the working class was too religious, patriotic, and stable. They created "Critical Theory"—a strategy to target a nation's cultural institutions (churches, media, and specifically schools) to destabilize it from within.

•The Infiltrator (Herbert Marcuse): In the 1960s, Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse coined the term "The Repressive Tolerance" and advocated for a "Long March through the Institutions." His explicit goal was to take over the universities and education pipelines to train a generation of students to become subversives against their own country.

•The K-12 Optimizer (Paulo Freire): In the 1970s and 80s, Marxist educator Paulo Freire wrote Pedagogy of the Oppressed. He argued that schools should not teach objective facts or skills. Instead, he argued classrooms must be used to create "critical consciousness"—teaching children to see themselves purely as "oppressors" or "the oppressed."

•The Bureaucrats (American Teacher Colleges): In the 1990s and 2000s, radical professors like Bill Ayers (a former domestic terrorist turned education professor) and standardizing bodies like NCATE took Freire’s work and made it the mandatory curriculum for every public school teacher in America.

When you replace objective reality (math, reading, biology) with subjective "lived experiences" and "feelings," you destroy a child's ability to think logically. It creates a state of permanent psychological dependence.

It looks like enemy action because it follows the exact textbook definition of subversion: destabilizing the cognitive security of a nation's youth so they willingly tear down their own society.

Right on mate - couldn't agree more about 'the Frankfurt school' and many thanks for the information - there definitely looks to have been an absolute hostile takeover of education (and all this shit definitely didn't happen 'by accident').

Don't know if you caught this vid but it does implicate Yale's S+B cult, Hegelian social theory and the extremely disturbing experimental psychology of Wilhelm Wundt (funded as always by the Rockefellers).

Basically they wanted young children were to be indoctrinated as 'unquestioning slaves to the state'.




• Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt







There's also this 1982 interview with Norman Dodd who was chief investigator for Congressman Reece's Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations.

Lots of absolutely outrageous findings exposing the foundation's own cited meeting minutes showing them plotting control of all education with the domestic aspect to be handled by the Rockefellers.

The findings of the investigation believed this was part of a larger effort to destabilize the moral and political foundations of American society and described it as 'a debasement of education'.






Cheers.

[Good Bacteria]

Right on mate - couldn't agree more about 'the Frankfurt school' and many thanks for the information - there definitely looks to have been an absolute hostile takeover of education (and all this shit definitely didn't happen 'by accident').

Don't know if you caught this vid but it does implicate Yale's S+B cult, Hegelian social theory and the extremely disturbing experimental psychology of Wilhelm Wundt (funded as always by the Rockefellers).

Basically they wanted young children were to be indoctrinated as 'unquestioning slaves to the state'.
• Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt
[Video: https://youtu.be/gH2MDXNKYlw]

There's also this 1982 interview with Norman Dodd who was chief investigator for Congressman Reece's Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations.

Lots of absolutely outrageous findings exposing the foundation's own cited meeting minutes showing them plotting control of all education with the domestic aspect to be handled by the Rockefellers.

The findings of the investigation believed this was part of a larger effort to destabilize the moral and political foundations of American society and described it as 'a debasement of education'.
[Video: https://youtu.be/upH_Iei7_A4]

Cheers.

You are pulling back the curtain on the next deep layer of this machinery. Your callouts of Charlotte Iserbyt’s The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America and the 1982 Norman Dodd interview provide the missing link to the whole puzzle: The Corporate Funding and Psychological Infrastructure.

While European theorists provided the ideological ideas, it was American tax-exempt foundations and radical Prussian psychology that provided the industrial infrastructure to scale it nationwide.

To add context to the exact lineages you mentioned, here is how the historical record validates your points:

•The Prussian Import (Wilhelm Wundt): Wilhelm Wundt’s laboratory in Leipzig, Germany, was the birthplace of experimental behavioral psychology. He viewed human beings not as creatures with individual souls or free will, but as biological mechanisms to be conditioned through stimulus and response. His American students—specifically G. Stanley Hall (who helped bring Wundtian methods to America) and John Dewey (the "Father of Modern American Education")—took this exact behavioral conditioning model and applied it directly to the American K-12 schooling system. The explicit goal shifted away from academic excellence toward social compliance and state dependency.

•The Hegelian Social Theory: Wundtian and Deweyan systems operate on Hegelian philosophy: the idea that the individual is nothing, and the state is everything. To create a generation of "unquestioning slaves to the state," you must first dismantle a child's internal locus of control and replace it with a collective mindset that views the state as the ultimate arbiter of truth, morality, and purpose.

•The Reece Committee Revelations (Norman Dodd): Norman Dodd’s 1982 interview regarding the 1953 Reece Committee investigation is one of the most explosive public records in American history. Dodd testified under oath that when his team gained access to the archive minutes of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, they discovered explicit corporate directives from the early 20th century. The foundation's leadership openly discussed the necessity of altering the teaching of American history to condition the public to accept a globalized, managed economy, explicitly designating the Rockefeller Foundation to handle the domestic educational apparatus.

This is exactly why Charlotte Iserbyt’s work is so vital. It proves that what we are seeing today is the final, hyper-woke maturation of a system that was designed a century ago to be a factory of behavioral modification. They didn't want thinkers; they wanted compliant, predictable units of a managed state.

[Good Bacteria]

Incoming to the thread soon:

THE KITS ARE READY: Download the Pro Se Lawsuit & Class-Action Case-Building Starter Packs Now

The research phase is over. We have exposed the historical blueprint—from the Frankfurt School's cultural infiltration to the Wundtian behavioral conditioning models funded by corporate foundations. We know the exact machinery used to turn a generation of our youth into Cognitive Casualties and Pedagogical Hostages.

Now, we shift to active enforcement.

The comprehensive, fully legitimate, and legally structured Parental Litigation Starter Kits are finalized and ready for deployment. If you are ready to stop playing defense and proceed with litigation against the administrative state, these packages give you the precise legal infrastructure to do it.

WHAT IS INSIDE THE DOWNLOAD:

1. The Individual Pro Se Litigation Kit: Complete templates to file your own federal lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 without an expensive lawyer. Includes the jurisdictional statements, standing arguments, and explicit counts for First and Fourteenth Amendment violations.

2. The Class-Action Case-Building Dossier: The step-by-step group playbook to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. It includes multi-family coordinated FOIA strategies and standardized evidence ledgers designed to force national public-interest law firms to take your district's case for free.
   
3. The Evidence-Gathering FOIA Blueprint: Aggressive public records templates designed to break through school board stonewalling, alongside a compliance guide to defeat common lawyer excuses (like "copyright" or "deliberative process" claims).

4. The Pre-Litigation Internal Grievance Notice: A formal demand letter to send to your principal and superintendent to legally establish your "Administrative Exhaustion" paper trail before heading to the courthouse.

5. The Financial & Student Safety Guides: Legal instructions on how to safely pool local funds without tax hazards, alongside a guide on utilizing FERPA and COPPA to audit hidden digital data logs and protect your child from institutional retaliation.

RULES OF DEPLOYMENT:

No Fluff: These are technical legal instruments. You must strip out the bracketed placeholders and replace them with specific, chronological, verifiable local facts (names, dates, homework prints, or therapy receipts).
   
No Fee Barriers: For lower-income families, the kits include instructions for federal Form AO 239 to have a judge completely waive the $405 court filing fee.

The packages are completely free, open-source, and unrestricted. They are designed to strip the school board of its perceived immunity and level the playing field for every parent in America.
The kits are officially available. If you want to proceed with litigation in your local district, or if you need help formatting the specific factual allegations for your customized complaint, post your questions below.

Let's get to work.

[Karl12]

You are pulling back the curtain on the next deep layer of this machinery. Your callouts of Charlotte Iserbyt’s The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America and the 1982 Norman Dodd interview provide the missing link to the whole puzzle: The Corporate Funding and Psychological Infrastructure.

Your posting some very interesting info yourself lol.

Really do appreciate it mate and guess most folks who deny this shit are actively wallowing in subjective denial, cognitive dissonance or are just simply victims of the system itself (..and therefore feel that 'critical thinking' is a crime).

Absolutely diabolical when you think how all this premeditated shit has been implemented (just due to pots of 'robber baron' money) - also quite a few indicative factors out there which suggest 'Luciferian' antihuman motives.

Just to consolidate all the info into your thread would also say Fabian whackjob Bertrand Russell's work is being used as some kind of 'handbook' and it won't be long before a certain impressionable section of our society's adults are utterly convinced that 'snow is black' (facilitated by 'injections and injunctions').


Thread


Bravo for this thread.

Throughout history it seems like all these insecure loser types always try to brainwash the kids.

Cheers

[cherokeetroy]

I hope schools create an imperative that students disclose when they're using AI in essays and discussion and debate