DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Do the laws of nature evolve with the cosmos?
#11
What about the cat and the double slit experiment?

Here is a fun one with the double slit, the universe doesn't know wtf is potting either so it it packs in error checking, observing decodes the signal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_correction_code
Quote:The central idea is that the sender encodes the message in a redundant way, most often by using an error correction code, or error correcting code (ECC).[sup][4][/sup][sup][5][/sup] The redundancy allows the receiver not only to detect errors that may occur anywhere in the message, but often to correct a limited number of errors. Therefore a reverse channel to request re-transmission may not be needed. The cost is a fixed, higher forward channel bandwidth.
The American mathematician Richard Hamming pioneered this field in the 1940s and invented the first error-correcting code in 1950: the Hamming (7,4) code.[sup][5][/sup]
FEC can be applied in situations where re-transmissions are costly or impossible, such as one-way communication links or when transmitting to multiple receivers in multicast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
Quote:In mathematics, the Leech lattice is an even unimodular lattice Λ[sub]24[/sub] in 24-dimensional Euclidean space which is one of the best models for the kissing number problem. It was discovered by John Leech (1967). It may also have been discovered (but not published) by Ernst Witt in 1940.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kissing_number
Quote:In geometry, the kissing number of a mathematical space is defined as the greatest number of non-overlapping unit spheres that can be arranged in that space such that they each touch a common unit sphere. For a given sphere packing (arrangement of spheres) in a given space, a kissing number can also be defined for each individual sphere as the number of spheres it touches. For a lattice packing the kissing number is the same for every sphere, but for an arbitrary sphere packing the kissing number may vary from one sphere to another.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_Golay_code
Quote:In mathematics and electronics engineering, a binary Golay code is a type of linear error-correcting code used in digital communications. The binary Golay code, along with the ternary Golay code, has a particularly deep and interesting connection to the theory of finite sporadic groups in mathematics.[sup][1][/sup] These codes are named in honor of Marcel J. E. Golay whose 1949 paper[sup][2][/sup] introducing them has been called, by E. R. Berlekamp, the "best single published page" in coding theory.[sup][3][/sup]




#12
a clock in a weaker gravitational field will tick faster
https://www.gpsworld.com/inside-the-box-...elativity/
Quote:According to the theory of special relativity, a moving clock ticks more slowly when compared with one that’s stationary at sea level. A clock aboard a GPS satellite will lose about 7 microseconds per day. That is three orders of magnitude larger than our budget for satellite clock error discussed earlier, therefore we can’t simply ignore it.

According to the theory of general relativity, on the other hand, a clock in a weaker gravitational field will tick faster than one that’s stationary at sea level. Apparently, gravity weighs down time, too. A clock aboard a GPS satellite in a medium Earth orbit will gain about 45 microseconds per day over a clock that’s at sea level on the earth.

The net effect: A GPS satellite clock will gain about 38 microseconds per day over a clock at rest at mean sea level. This effect is secular, meaning the time offset will grow from day to day.

time and gravity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation
Quote:Time dilation is the difference in elapsed time as measured by two clocks, either because of a relative velocity between them (special relativity), or a difference in gravitational potential between their locations (general relativity). When unspecified, "time dilation" usually refers to the effect due to velocity. The dilation compares "wristwatch" clock readings between events measured in different inertial frames and is not observed by visual comparison of clocks across moving frames.

When do you exist? On what dimensions does consciousness exist? When you breathe and your heart pumps what moves?

a clock in a weaker gravitational field will tick faster - what happens to consciousness here? why do astronauts trip orbs





sniff the purple stone  Lol you have to go focus 10 and then wait for the beetles
#13
I guess the laws will evolve when we do @UltraBudgie since we named them funny how the Ancient Egyptians understood thing we struggle with today

Nut
 
Quote:Utterance 432 – the Pyramid Texts (written circa 2500 BCE):
O Great One who became Sky,
You are Strong, you are Mighty.
Every place is filled with Your Beauty.
The whole world lies beneath you. You possess it!
As you enfold the whole Earth and all things in Your arms, enfold me too.
Make me an Indestructible Star in your Body.

I look up at the stars at night, stretch my arms out to the edge of my vision and wrap everything around the goddess that is standing in front of me. She is the night. 4D time, we all live inside of her.
#14
People seem to think of evolution as a linear progression, or survival of the fittest. Neither is quite true. Evolution is adaptation, if species don’t adapt they may become extinct. So life is adapting to its environment when the need arises. 

Does the universe adapt? Well apparently it has. But the laws governing physicality remain constant, at least at our level of reality. Quantum physics suggests things that are impossible to standard Newtonian physics, such as quantum entanglement, spooky action at a distance. Suggesting the laws of the quantum are different to that of the physical. Physics. 

It seems to me our species will have to adapt or evolve its understanding of physical laws and more of an understanding of the micro which (quantum) makes up the macro. Despite the great strides in learning, there is so much more yet to discover. 

So as long as you don’t think of evolution as a kind of progress from our own point of view, I would say yes the universe is evolving.
#15
I think this is for you, finding all the wrong stuff

[Image: j8V7vuH.png]
#16
that and this goes together, just ignore the tulpas, they are demons.

[Image: ufo_tulpa.png]
#17
Read with comprehension. I cannot do more than this, I even showed you projections.