12-23-2024, 03:57 PM
This post was last modified 12-24-2024, 10:37 AM by Maxmars. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: grammar
This desperate fixation on enforcing situational gender awareness in prepubescence is absolute the single most unnatural "consensus" science product to ever cry out to be heard... it will be remembered in history alongside the likes of eugenics as 'contrived bias rationale.'
This report is a demonstration of the lingering effect of the academic trend of "embracing" DEI.
Endlessly trying to "forge" the elevation of gender development into a "crisis" that 'scientists' are virtuously attending to.
The millions of dollars in funneled money to promote this as 'desperately needed' is telling of intent... not to 'serve mankind' but to serve it's activism...
the pinnacle 'virtuous' activity of modern academia.
How can we presuppose a crisis of gender identity before the child is finished being a child, when gender ideation is not yet developed?
Why don't we just wait until the child spontaneously and independently asks about it?
And why can't we have their family answer according to their knowledge, culture, faith, and wisdom?
Oh, I know... someone else "knows" more, is more "righteous," is closer to "God", and speaks the wisdom of the "master" class...
I don't blame all scientists for the research effort, but some of them in media are to blame for this attempt to wield flaccid "consensus science" like a 'social' bludgeon...
I do blame those who editorialize the attempt as if it related to 'virtue.'
Science is neither 'by consensus' nor 'virtuous.' It can't be those things and be "science."
Science requires argument of fact... who 'thinks or believes' whatever is an irrelevancy.
Virtue requires ego... in true science (despite the media,) there is no accommodation for egos.
This report is a demonstration of the lingering effect of the academic trend of "embracing" DEI.
Endlessly trying to "forge" the elevation of gender development into a "crisis" that 'scientists' are virtuously attending to.
The millions of dollars in funneled money to promote this as 'desperately needed' is telling of intent... not to 'serve mankind' but to serve it's activism...
the pinnacle 'virtuous' activity of modern academia.
How can we presuppose a crisis of gender identity before the child is finished being a child, when gender ideation is not yet developed?
Why don't we just wait until the child spontaneously and independently asks about it?
And why can't we have their family answer according to their knowledge, culture, faith, and wisdom?
Oh, I know... someone else "knows" more, is more "righteous," is closer to "God", and speaks the wisdom of the "master" class...
I don't blame all scientists for the research effort, but some of them in media are to blame for this attempt to wield flaccid "consensus science" like a 'social' bludgeon...
I do blame those who editorialize the attempt as if it related to 'virtue.'
Science is neither 'by consensus' nor 'virtuous.' It can't be those things and be "science."
Science requires argument of fact... who 'thinks or believes' whatever is an irrelevancy.
Virtue requires ego... in true science (despite the media,) there is no accommodation for egos.
