Epstein Archive
 



  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
USS Jackson Feb 2023
#11
(04-11-2025, 08:24 AM)pianopraze Wrote: It is flir, I think the Black is hot.

taken from ship looking up.

It happened at night.

Multiple witnesses on the ship visually.

4 radar returns,

they caught it on this multi-modal system, apparently they recorded it with other recording systems, this is just the only thing leaked so far. 

all 4 craft took off very fast at exact same time.

is it true, they emerged from the ocean?
Reply
#12
(04-11-2025, 08:39 AM)quintessentone Wrote: Hey pianopraze.

I just enlarged the picture and it looks pixelated around those objects. Now why would that be? Does the FLIR system produce anomalies. What does that one witness mean by Safire within the FLIR system? Again, it's just one witness, a poor video, and no investigation from the military on that ship. Isn't that odd to you?

if I remember correctly from watching the video in my op this is someone with a phone recording the monitor of the system which is named in the video. 

I think this is real military leak of the incident. They are real ufo. The footage is real

they could be China or USA craft that we don’t admit to haveing but this is real.
Reply
#13
(04-11-2025, 07:22 PM)Darkorange Wrote: is it true, they emerged from the ocean?

That is what was reported by service members to corbel and Knapp.

I don’t know if it’s true. But it is true that they emerged from the water is what Knapp and Corbel are reporting.

ufology is… I never assume anything is ‘true’… and my opinions are constantly shifting as new info comes in on each and every incident.
Reply
#14
(04-12-2025, 08:33 PM)pianopraze Wrote: That is what was reported by service members to corbel and Knapp.

I don’t know if it’s true. But it is true that they emerged from the water is what Knapp and Corbel are reporting.

ufology is… I never assume anything is ‘true’… and my opinions are constantly shifting as new info comes in on each and every incident.

Thank you.

This would imply an underwater craft-controller which is hosting and releasing those drones.
Reply
#15
(04-13-2025, 05:33 PM)Darkorange Wrote: Thank you.

This would imply an underwater craft-controller which is hosting and releasing those drones.

I believe I’ve heard at least two say they thought what you just said.

i think Lou Elizondo is one, but my memory is very bad right now. The second might have been the admiral that’s whistleblowing? That is wild guess.
Reply
#16
UPDATE:

one of those that saw this just went public.

video in link: Twitter video
 
Quote:U.S. Navy UFO Witness Goes Public, Says Bright Light Emerged From the Ocean Operations Specialist Senior Chief Alex Wiggins (active-duty, 23 years of service) recalls his encounter with a UAP onboard the USS Jackson. “I’ve never witnessed that ever in my life.”
Reply
#17
Looks like he talked a lot, lots more in this video:
Reply
#18
(04-12-2025, 08:28 PM)pianopraze Wrote: if I remember correctly from watching the video in my op this is someone with a phone recording the monitor of the system which is named in the video. 

I think this is real military leak of the incident. They are real ufo. The footage is real

they could be China or USA craft that we don’t admit to haveing but this is real.

Oh, for sure, it's a type of military leak, but the question is What of?

I will keep on my skeptical hat for now.

Look at what Boeing and Convair are doing off the coast of Cali, and let's try to figure this out.

Also look to how Ukraine and Russia are developing 'flying submarine drones'.

I think we should debunk those first or envision what classified UAPs they may be developing.
"The real trouble with reality is that there is no background music." Anonymous

Plato's Chariot Allegory
Reply
#19
(04-16-2025, 09:13 AM)quintessentone Wrote: Oh, for sure, it's a type of military leak, but the question is What of?

I will keep on my skeptical hat for now.

Look at what Boeing and Convair are doing off the coast of Cali, and let's try to figure this out.

Also look to how Ukraine and Russia are developing 'flying submarine drones'.

I think we should debunk those first or envision what classified UAPs they may be developing.



I would suspect China. They already have drones capable of being launched from subs, these are small, see picture below, but I imagine they can create larger ones too. 

but these are not going to fly as fast as the eyewitness accounts… but then again eyewitness accounts and reliability are… not used in the same sentence often.

Asia times link

[Image: At.png]
Reply
#20
(04-16-2025, 10:32 AM)pianopraze Wrote: I would suspect China. They already have drones capable of being launched from subs, these are small, see picture below, but I imagine they can create larger ones too. 

but these are not going to fly as fast as the eyewitness accounts… but then again eyewitness accounts and reliability are… not used in the same sentence often.

Asia times link

[Image:
https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/At.png]

I have dismissed it being shot out of a foreign player's submarine because with your satellite surveillance and military ship's surveillance, I really doubt any other country's submarine would not be detected.

However, I have not ruled out a flying submarine drone from another country that could travel across the Pacific Ocean.

Right now, I am leaning towards Convair developing a next gen military weapon capable of performing in many different environments, and/or Boeing with submersible flying surveillance drones.
"The real trouble with reality is that there is no background music." Anonymous

Plato's Chariot Allegory
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  image released of 'cylindrical' UFO shot down by US fighter jet over Alaska in 2023 putnam6 10 893 12-10-2024, 11:12 AM
Last Post: Maxmars
  UFO Oct 1, 2023 West Bloomfield, MI repost ATS Quantum12 23 913 11-09-2024, 10:49 AM
Last Post: Sirius