DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Toy sims show mass weight reduction with multi pulsed emmitter array
#1
Its been staring us in the face for centuries. You always hear that they never left any record of how they built the ancient magelithic structures. I think they left the instructions carved in relief after relief across the ancient world.

Papyrus gets easily destroyed , records get hidden , languages change , translations change , Libaray of Alexandria burned to the ground. So how do you transcend all of that? Carve it right into the stone and it will last forever . 
 
Imagine the Sumerian hand bag was a frequency generator 
[Image: 19caa94ac22c0f328056848b3e2518ad.png]




The pinecone with its perfect fibonaci sequence as a magnetic coil/tuner
 
[Image: 4b503e61e11f284e83ecd2530276dff5.png]
The tree of life is a dodecahedral array around a massive stone (multiple pulsed emmiters)
[Image: f3e8c59adbc70cb8789f468ea1a0bb71.png]
[Image: c95677ad06f9ade83d4b485ffeb50e17.png]
The wrist watches as synchronizers / phase shifters.
[Image: 4eb7792f9d6ed9901b35167da4b01dc8.jpg]
Using this setup with different parameters I asked all the ais to run toy simulations . And every one came back showing massive weight reduction up to 98% with the right parameters.

Chat gpt is very hard to get to do anything fringe, but even chat gpt ran the sims and saw up to 80% load mudulation . Here is the  Zenodo preprint with all the parameters  it used so it could be completely reproduced.
  Chat gpts screenshot ready summary .
[Image: bc7645ba9eb795c6ea49624354d27f2d.png]

Google Ai shows up to 98% weight reduction 
[Image: be0a8be0842982f64e88684ba24e2afc.jpg]


Then I took it to Claude and Claude ran his own parameters and Claude also shows weight reduction in his simulation.
[Image: a51e15cbbcf60c3ab3ff11c0bd3866b2.jpg]
Then after giving Claude Geminis parameters.



[Image: 56420a3edd6a83da508a23d68797b48b.jpg]

So after all of this I took it to a fresh grok to see if he could reproduce the results 

[Image: 694f8c301b2dd67a6ee99fd89961b931.png]

https://x.com/i/grok/share/518b60c57b0f4...07bb2313bb
You can go to any Ai and say  Imagine the Sumerian  handbag was a freuency generator the pinecone was a coil/tuner . The Tree of life was a dodecahedrol array around a massive stone and the watches were phase shifters . Then ask if they see where you are going.

They will see it immediatly.

Quick clarification . This is not anti gravity  but localized time dilation. 144 Hz resonance accelerates local time flow within dodecahedral array boundary, reducing effective gravitational coupling while stone's rest mass remains constant

 I know this is not proof of anti gravity or time dilation but it Is proof the math allows for it,.

AND IF THE MATH ALLOWS FOR IT?

https://zenodo.org/records/19144113
#2
The AI is only giving you the answer you want. Clanker is trying to make you happy. It is not the correct answer though. 

Let's take the dodecahedron for an example. If it is an energy device, then why are no two the same size? Would that not affect the operation?
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#3
(03-22-2026, 12:46 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: The AI is only giving you the answer you want. Clanker is trying to make you happy. It is not the correct answer though. 

Let's take the dodecahedron for an example. If it is an energy device, then why are no two the same size? Would that not affect the operation?

They are not all just hallucinating the result. And go give them the exact same parameters but different frequency and you will not get the results

And no 2 being the same size is actually key to the whol mechanism. Maybe read the preprint?
#4
(03-22-2026, 12:46 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: The AI is only giving you the answer you want. Clanker is trying to make you happy. It is not the correct answer though. 


Ok if this were true you should easily be able to get all the ais to show mass weight reduction for any simulation you come up with.

Please do that
#5
The carving of the person with the handbag and wristwatch also has wings attached to its shoulders.

It could never balance in flight and we don't have any historical evidence of such body morphology.

That's how you know that the image is fantastical.

Imagine that the pine cone signifies that it's nuts.

Tongue
Support the Christchurch Call
#6
(03-22-2026, 01:03 PM)CTFtheory Wrote: They are not all just hallucinating the result. And go give them the exact same parameters but different frequency and you will not get the results

And no 2 being the same size is actually key to the whol mechanism. Maybe read the preprint?

It reads like a medical doctor explaining orbital dynamics. 

Misused technical words and left out information.

Is it audio or electromagnetic waves? It never says.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#7
(03-22-2026, 01:32 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: It reads like a medical doctor trying to explaining orbital dynamics. 

Misused technical words and left out information.

Is it audio or electromagnetic waves? It never says.



Just go get the ais to find mass weight reduction in a simulation. Should be easy .

Oh yeah and make sure its reproducable . So any one can take it to any Ai and reproduce the results of 80% weight reduction
#8
(03-22-2026, 01:34 PM)CTFtheory Wrote: Just go get the ais to find mass weight reduction in a simulation. Should be easy .

Oh yeah and make sure its reproducable . So any one can take it to any Ai and reproduce the results of 80% weight reduction

I am sorry, what? You are now changing to weight reduction? The op is about mass reduction. The two are related but not interchangable.

I don't trust AI simulatons. I have seen too many 6 fingered, 3 legged, pictures with extra elbows to believe them.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#9
(03-22-2026, 03:01 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: I am sorry, what? You are now changing to weight reduction? The op is about mass reduction. The two are related but not interchangable.

I don't trust AI simulatons. I have seen too many 6 fingered, 3 legged, pictures with extra elbows to believe them.


The title of the thread says mass weight reduction. Mass meaning alot of weight 
.
#10
(03-22-2026, 03:01 PM)BeyondKnowledge Wrote: I am sorry, what? You are now changing to weight reduction? The op is about mass reduction. The two are related but not interchangable.

I don't trust AI simulatons. I have seen too many 6 fingered, 3 legged, pictures with extra elbows to believe them.


So then you cant get the ais to just simulate weight  loss.
You shoukd be able to get them to just tell you what you want to hear right?