The Property Of Infinite Uncertainty; Part 2, ∞ = 1, Infinity Equals One

[sahgwa]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image... White.png]

Some questions, largely rhetorical for you: 
What do you mean when you say that everything has infinite capacity?  Capacity for what?  
What is 'behind' infinity? 
Does infinity underlay and 'create' the world? 
Can we truly perceive infinity as humans ?

[myselfaswell]

Some questions, largely rhetorical for you: 
What do you mean when you say that everything has infinite capacity?  Capacity for what?  
What is 'behind' infinity? 
Does infinity underlay and 'create' the world? 
Can we truly perceive infinity as humans ?

Hey mate, thanks for the questions.  If you get the chance can you edit your post to take out the huge quotation, it's a PITA particularly if you're on mobile.

So, as for the infinite capacity bizzo, it really can't be answered in one sentence or thereabouts, so you'll have to wait for Part 4.  It will be out before the end of this week.

There is nothing "behind" infinity.  Infinity exists as a property of something, as I have written.  If nothing exists then ∞ = 0, if something does exist then ∞ = 1.

"Does infinity underlay and 'create' the world?".  Yes it does.  As you will see in the next piece, infinity is fundamental to our existence.

"Can we truly perceive infinity as humans ?".  I don't know that it's perceivable to the extent that you can poke it, however the truth is that it is something that is less mind boggling than traditional dogmatic ideas, about infinity, would have you believe.

[sahgwa]

Hey mate, thanks for the questions.  If you get the chance can you edit your post to take out the huge quotation, it's a PITA particularly if you're on mobile.

So, as for the infinite capacity bizzo, it really can't be answered in one sentence or thereabouts, so you'll have to wait for Part 4.  It will be out before the end of this week.

There is nothing "behind" infinity.  Infinity exists as a property of something, as I have written.  If nothing exists then ∞ = 0, if something does exist then ∞ = 1.

"Does infinity underlay and 'create' the world?".  Yes it does.  As you will see in the next piece, infinity is fundamental to our existence.

"Can we truly perceive infinity as humans ?".  I don't know that it's perceivable to the extent that you can poke it, however the truth is that it is something that is less mind boggling than traditional dogmatic ideas, about infinity, would have you believe.

But if infinity, as you have written, is a property of 'something,' that means ipso facto it is behind that something?  Or in other words, the something could not exist without infinity.  
That is to say, the void is true nature?

[myselfaswell]

But if infinity, as you have written, is a property of 'something,' that means ipso facto it is behind that something?  Or in other words, the something could not exist without infinity.  
That is to say, the void is true nature?

Infinity is a property of creation, one cannot exit without the other.  As I have written, when something exists, so infinity exists. There is then no "behind".

"That is to say, the void is true nature?" No, there is no void.  There is ∞ = 0, or there is ∞ = 1.  Perhaps revisit Part 1 and the definition of nothing.

[CCoburn]

But if infinity, as you have written, is a property of 'something,' that means ipso facto it is behind that something?  Or in other words, the something could not exist without infinity.  
That is to say, the void is true nature?

Even some of the most mundane trivial things that we experience everyday and take for granted have the deepest of roots. People compose music which incorporates the rhythmic and the melodic but we likely aren't the source of these things. More than likely we are just reverberating primordial and eternal rhythms from a core algorithmic rhythm. A song of the universe – an ever-flowing melody of creation and destruction.

Rhythm

It comes and it goes it ebbs and it flows, like the tides and the waxing and waning of the moon – "true nature"

[myselfaswell]

Even some of the most mundane trivial things that we experience everyday and take for granted have the deepest of roots. 

Yes they can they do, but that would be an oversight by the observer then, just sayin.  

Mike Oldfield, one of my all time top 5's.  My pick, QE2 best album, and Taurus 2 best track.

[CCoburn]

Yes they can they do, but that would be an oversight by the observer then, just sayin.  

Mike Oldfield, one of my all time top 5's.  My pick, QE2 best album, and Taurus 2 best track.

I'm not familiar with Mike Oldfield other than that particular track that I pick on occasion when in the context of the moon. I don't pick tracks merely because they are contextual though, I have to at least like them a little, and that one maybe just a little more than a little.


Roots

Some micro to macrocosmic analogies aren't quite so obvious or discernable though. Take for example the Yin&Yang that is most often associated with the feminine and masculine, but I believe there is a deeper root there before those attributes were even manifested: negative and positive existence respectively AKA nothing and something...

[myselfaswell]

Some micro to macrocosmic analogies aren't quite so obvious or discernable though. Take for example the Yin&Yang that is most often associated with the feminine and masculine, but I believe there is a deeper root there before those attributes were even manifested: negative and positive existence respectively AKA nothing and something...

Please ignore my overly flippant comment, yes, you're right.

It may well be that, while we are in this reality, there there is a yin and yang, but possibly the real truth is there is only one, there is only a complete whole.  We see two sides of the same coin, but it's really just one coin.