The Property Of Infinite Uncertainty: Part 1, ∞ = 0, Infinity Equals Zero

[CCoburn]

The complete absence of everything is a “state” that has to have the potential to exist, regardless of how improbable it may seem, and that’s really important.

Even the very first line is flawed. I could do this all day. "A complete absence of everything", yet you say that there is "the potential to exist"? (priceless), and what would be the nature of this "potential"? A "complete absence of everything" is absolutely 'nothing', but is this potential not 'something'; is the catalyst of this "potential" not 'something'?

This is exactly the reason why we use phrases such as "virtual negation". Are you sure you're not contradicting yourself? You don't have to answer that.

Adios Amigos...