01-29-2025, 11:24 AM
(01-29-2025, 09:39 AM)CCoburn Wrote: False Premise Equals False Conclusion
The argument is based on a false premise leading to a false conclusion.
There are a couple different cosmological models that incorporate opposing spatial mediums with expansion theory being the most widely accepted last I knew.
From the latter of the above the universe would not be "infinite". It would be finite, and the fact that it is expanding supports that proposition. This would be in opposition to a static eternal spatial medium that continues on endlessly without outer boundary and would therefore be considered "infinite", although you would not be able to regress or compress such an 'existence' since there would not be any "outer boundary" from which to facilitate any such regression.
Spatial Parameters | Conclusion
Type 1. The universe is finite; there was never any "infinity" to begin with.
Type 2. The spatial medium is static, infinite, and eternal and cannot be compressed or regressed.
And not only is infinity misrepresented in "∞ = 0" by compactifying a 'finite' universe', but in a cosmological setting zero(nothing) is undefined, so the equation itself doesn't really have any valid meaning and is pretty much pointless.
The only justification one might have for proposing "∞ = 0" maybe is that from type 1 above it doesn't exist so it's equal to zero, but I don't see the point really.
I will refer you to a much earlier comment I made to you,
Quote:It would seem than that you're happy to accept that there is only "The Universe". ?
Your commentary is entirely exclusionary to the infinite number of possibilities of our reality. It would appear you don't understand the ∞ = 0 that I have written about.
Perhaps, as a starting point to help, take a line from the signature of Sirius.
Quote:I am more than my physical body. Because I am more than physical matter, I can perceive that which is greater than the physical world.
There doesn't have to be a "The Universe" for ∞ = 0, or even ∞ = 1 for that matter.
