The Property Of Infinite Uncertainty: Part 1, ∞ = 0, Infinity Equals Zero

[CCoburn]

 

∞ = 0, Visualising The Improbable State.

 To get to this point of infinity equals zero that I’m talking about, what I’d like you to do is think about all the things in the universe, real or imagined. I’d like you to picture our universe and possibly a multiverse.  I’d like you to think of all of the galaxies, and all the planets, stars and black holes in them.  I would like you to think about all the forces  in the universe, like gravity.  I would like you to imagine all of these things or as much as you can in your mind, including all the space it occupies, even God, everything, simultaneously.Got it?

Right, now what I want you to do is screw it all up. I want you to see it all getting crushed together. I want you to collapse space and time into itself and collecting all of those other things as it collapses. And I want you to crush it all up into the tiniest little thing that you can imagine.
 
All good?
 
Now I want you to make that tiny little thing disappear. That tiny little thing with all of those gargantuan galaxies, all those things and concepts and ideas and space, I want you to make it disappear from your mind. Gone.
 
There is no God, there are no universes, there is no time, there are no forces, there is no space, they are all gone.
 
Hopefully at this point you have developed a sense of a total and complete absence of everything.  That total and absolute absence is so complete that it cannot even be described as nothing, because nothing doesn’t exist.  It is an absence so absolute that it can only be expressed by this binary notation, ∞ = 0, Infinity Equals Zero.

False Premise Equals False Conclusion

The argument is based on a false premise leading to a false conclusion.

There are a couple different cosmological models that incorporate opposing spatial mediums with expansion theory being the most widely accepted last I knew.

From the latter of the above the universe would not be "infinite". It would be finite, and the fact that it is expanding supports that proposition. This would be in opposition to a static eternal spatial medium that continues on endlessly without outer boundary and would therefore be considered "infinite", although you would not be able to regress or compress such an 'existence' since there would not be any "outer boundary" from which to facilitate any such regression.

Spatial Parameters | Conclusion

Type 1. The universe is finite; there was never any "infinity" to begin with.

Type 2. The spatial medium is static, infinite, and eternal and cannot be compressed or regressed.

And not only is infinity misrepresented in "∞ = 0" by compactifying a 'finite' universe', but in a cosmological setting zero(nothing) is undefined, so the equation itself doesn't really have any valid meaning and is pretty much pointless.

The only justification one might have for proposing "∞ = 0" maybe is that from type 1 above it doesn't exist so it's equal to zero, but I don't see the point really.