12-11-2023, 08:28 PM
Bob Heironimus is that you?
Show me the suit... hell somebody could make a few bucks on the suit, even a replica.
It's not just about Patty...
Explaining the why or why not here, when it's been done over and over, doesn't seem productive. I find the sheer fact they went looking for a bigfoot and found one and filmed it, and it hasn't been replicated very suspect in itself.
But
It's irrelevant to all the other eyewitness stories and accounts before it became such a monetized mess it is today.
Do I believe it 100% no I don't, but I'm not dismissive of eyewitness accounts of persons who have no reason to lie or never tried to make money off of their story. Over history, it's in the tens of thousands. not to mention the thousands of footprint casts.
It makes no sense for there to be hoaxed footprints and trails of footprints in places where they would likely never be discovered.
Even if it isn't a big hairy ape-like creature, we have a small feral race of humans with incredibly big feet walking in the forests of North America.
The cripple foot cast alone would take somebody with knowledge of the mid-tarsal break and how to incorporate it into an essential club foot cast, for what purpose?
![[Image: bf02.thumb.jpg.308bd67eee31e9a5d32dacfb2afaec01.jpg]](https://bigfootforums.com/uploads/monthly_2022_07/bf02.thumb.jpg.308bd67eee31e9a5d32dacfb2afaec01.jpg)
![[Image: bf01.thumb.jpg.b8daa4509cb10d5226891ad4468f35cc.jpg]](https://bigfootforums.com/uploads/monthly_2022_07/bf01.thumb.jpg.b8daa4509cb10d5226891ad4468f35cc.jpg)
I've always enjoyed bigfootforums.com, whenever I want to check the validity of one of these stories they are pretty good at debunking them.
Are they biased towards the authenticity of the Patty film? probably, but their analysis and thread full of replies have got to be more in-depth than the mostly anecdotal replies here on Deny Ignorance at the moment.
Heres a link where these were on display in Berkeley
https://newsarchive.berkeley.edu/news/be...foot.shtml
Show me the suit... hell somebody could make a few bucks on the suit, even a replica.
It's not just about Patty...
Explaining the why or why not here, when it's been done over and over, doesn't seem productive. I find the sheer fact they went looking for a bigfoot and found one and filmed it, and it hasn't been replicated very suspect in itself.
But
It's irrelevant to all the other eyewitness stories and accounts before it became such a monetized mess it is today.
Do I believe it 100% no I don't, but I'm not dismissive of eyewitness accounts of persons who have no reason to lie or never tried to make money off of their story. Over history, it's in the tens of thousands. not to mention the thousands of footprint casts.
It makes no sense for there to be hoaxed footprints and trails of footprints in places where they would likely never be discovered.
Even if it isn't a big hairy ape-like creature, we have a small feral race of humans with incredibly big feet walking in the forests of North America.
The cripple foot cast alone would take somebody with knowledge of the mid-tarsal break and how to incorporate it into an essential club foot cast, for what purpose?
I've always enjoyed bigfootforums.com, whenever I want to check the validity of one of these stories they are pretty good at debunking them.
Are they biased towards the authenticity of the Patty film? probably, but their analysis and thread full of replies have got to be more in-depth than the mostly anecdotal replies here on Deny Ignorance at the moment.
Heres a link where these were on display in Berkeley
https://newsarchive.berkeley.edu/news/be...foot.shtml
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
