05-27-2024, 11:34 AM
It's always difficult to find a discussion about BF that isn't so ridiculious my bloodpressure goes astronomical. CONGRATS!!!!
For Hart:
Robert Kryder's work is exactly up your alley. He's been "pulling a Jane Goodall" documenting scat,family units, ect. He goes at this 100% scientifically. He brought his presentation to the Community College of New Mexico to get more credentialed academic's involved. All his info was collected pre-2017 so why is the topic still stuck in the 1970's?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-tgiHHuwJo&t=3910s
In General:
The problem (YMMV) is the hordes of folk who've decided to pick up bigfooting with almost no knowledge of the wilds. Don't know a rabbit screaming from a fox, don't know their botanicals,
don't know their birds OR bird calls. Most can't tell a normal game trail from a abnormal one. But there they are bloviating all over the interwebs.
If you say something enough unfortunately it becomes valid.
The whole "believer" thing is also out of hand.
There's people who "believe there are Elk" but haven't seen them in the wild (example) and people who've seen Elk in the wild. I have yet to hear anyone who hasn't seen a Elk, Bear, Wolverine in the wild called "A Believer". Wolverine & BF are equally elusive and just as difficult view on a casual camping trip, hike or fishing trip.
While it's true the major sticking point is no body yet, it boggles my mind people believe in the sham of string theory but can't fathom a relic hominid avoiding modern society like the plague. The Ape theory also is ridiculous. Monkey's and other types except gorillia's have no problem mobbing town's, villages and wreaking havoc. A fact conveniently forgotten by "researchers". So far the closest BF has come to ape behavior is territorial disputes with humans building/living or hunting in their area's.
Fred Roehl has finally gotten the Native Peoples of Alaska to open up about what's been going on up there. A lot of it isn't pretty.
https://www.youtube.com/@subarcticalaska...tch/videos
For Hart:
Robert Kryder's work is exactly up your alley. He's been "pulling a Jane Goodall" documenting scat,family units, ect. He goes at this 100% scientifically. He brought his presentation to the Community College of New Mexico to get more credentialed academic's involved. All his info was collected pre-2017 so why is the topic still stuck in the 1970's?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-tgiHHuwJo&t=3910s
In General:
The problem (YMMV) is the hordes of folk who've decided to pick up bigfooting with almost no knowledge of the wilds. Don't know a rabbit screaming from a fox, don't know their botanicals,
don't know their birds OR bird calls. Most can't tell a normal game trail from a abnormal one. But there they are bloviating all over the interwebs.
If you say something enough unfortunately it becomes valid.
The whole "believer" thing is also out of hand.
There's people who "believe there are Elk" but haven't seen them in the wild (example) and people who've seen Elk in the wild. I have yet to hear anyone who hasn't seen a Elk, Bear, Wolverine in the wild called "A Believer". Wolverine & BF are equally elusive and just as difficult view on a casual camping trip, hike or fishing trip.
While it's true the major sticking point is no body yet, it boggles my mind people believe in the sham of string theory but can't fathom a relic hominid avoiding modern society like the plague. The Ape theory also is ridiculous. Monkey's and other types except gorillia's have no problem mobbing town's, villages and wreaking havoc. A fact conveniently forgotten by "researchers". So far the closest BF has come to ape behavior is territorial disputes with humans building/living or hunting in their area's.
Fred Roehl has finally gotten the Native Peoples of Alaska to open up about what's been going on up there. A lot of it isn't pretty.
https://www.youtube.com/@subarcticalaska...tch/videos
