04-08-2024, 06:35 AM
(04-07-2024, 11:52 PM)Kenzo Wrote: I think you dont have a clue here, you are defending creating systems that will be used wrong .Maybe I don't have a clue, but at least I do not pretend to have one.
What I am defending is the right for anyone to decide about their own life.
Quote:The medical field is full of unethical basterds, fucking basterds , morons and idiots that are full of shit .Like any other field.
Quote:Example : An independent review commission conceded that tinnitus could satisfy the criteria for legal euthanasia to 47 woman in Netherland, mother of two , and they killed her. it was " reviewed by professionals" Just like that, because someone asked to be helped , to be killed .I'm not sure I understand it, did she ask for assisted death because of tinnitus and it was conceded?
If that's what happened, where's the problem?
Quote:The system will be used also to persons who are not not physically ill. Psychiatric problems is enough ...A psychiatric problem may be a good reason for a person to ask for assisted death, as it may be a source of extreme discomfort.
Quote:Once the system is created/enabled there will be wrong doings , and by time the wrong doings are being normalized.....so 10-20 years forward wrong doings are then more often.Could you explain how the Portuguese system I posted some posts back allows for those wrong doings and why they will be normalized?
